Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:10:52.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative growth and development of four spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) accessions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark J. VanGessel ,
Jill Schroeder  and
Philip Westra
Mark J. VanGessel*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
Jill Schroeder
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Philip Westra
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Weed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
*
Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in Colorado and New Mexico to examine growth and development of spurred anoda accessions from Colorado, Mississippi, New Mexico, and North Carolina. Accessions were grown in a common garden in both locations. Leaf and stem weight ratios, leaf area ratio, and leaf area per plant were determined. North Carolina and Mississippi accessions were similar in morphology and appearance. Leaf shape, degree of pubescence, and coloration were different in the Colorado and New Mexico accessions. At both sites, the Colorado accession was taller and the canopy wider than other accessions. In Colorado in 1993, North Carolina and New Mexico accessions had the highest total weight followed by Colorado, then Mississippi. In 1994, final total weights of North Carolina, Mississippi, and New Mexico accessions were similar and greater than the Colorado accession. All accessions had similar final total weights in New Mexico in 1993. In 1994, Mississippi, North Carolina, and New Mexico accessions had similar total weights. The Colorado accession flowered earlier than other accessions. Seeds from Mississippi and North Carolina accessions grown in Colorado were heavier than the New Mexico or Colorado accession. This research demonstrates why making inferences of weed biology for variable species that occur over diverse geographic and climatic conditions is difficult and why regionally specific data are needed for variable species.

Keywords

Spurred anoda, Anoda cristata (L.) Schlecht. ANVCRGrowth analysisleaf area ratioleaf weight ratiospecific leaf areastem weight ratioweed biologyANVCR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 91 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Research and Education Center, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE 19947-9623

References

Literature Cited

Alcoccr-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992a. Differential competitiveness of sulfonylurea resistant and susceptible prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6: 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcocer-Ruthling, M., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1992b. Seed biology of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 6: 858–864.Google Scholar
Bates, D. M. 1987. Chromosome numbers and evolution in Anoda and Periptera (Malvaceae). Aliso 11: 523–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecke, B. J. and Tobola, P. 1996. Growth and development of wild poinsettia (Euphorbia heterophylla) selections in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 44: 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J. and Brecke, B. J. 1989. Growth and development of Florida beggarweed (Desmodium tortuosum) selections. Weed Sci. 37: 207–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25: 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. M. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1983. Yields of three cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars as influenced by spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) competition. Weed Sci. 31: 303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandler, J. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1979. Spurred Anoda: A Potential Weed in Southern Crops. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, Agricultural Review and Management, Southern Series, No. 2. 19 p.Google Scholar
Conard, S. G. and Radosevich, S. R. 1979. Ecological fitness of Senecio vulgaris and Amaranthus retroflexus biotypes susceptible and resistant to atrazine. J. Appl. Ecol. 16: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984. Growth and reproductive characteristics of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes. Weed Sci. 32: 525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45: 392–407.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Lurvey, E. L., Miller, T. L., and Porter, D. J. 1990. Growth and development of wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) biotypes. Weed Technol. 4: 415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1991. Emergence periodicity of six summer annual weed species. Weed Sci. 39: 595–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, P. A. 1987. Revision of the genus Anoda (Malvaceae). Aliso 11: 485–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, J. C., ed. 1993. The Jepson Manual: Higher Plants of California Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 747–748.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. F., Duesing, J. H., Antonovics, J., and Patterson, D. T. 1988. Growth and performance of triazine-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Solanum nigrum over a range of temperatures. Can. J. Bot. 66: 847–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1996. Existence of ecotypes among populations of entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 44: 540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, W. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1975. Competitive potential of spurred anoda in soybeans and cotton. Ark. Farm Res. 24: 5.Google Scholar
McGregor, R. L., Barkley, T. M., Brooks, R. E., and Schofield, E. K., eds. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press or Kansas, p. 561.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. 1973. Cotton weeds. Weeds Today 4: 6–9.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. S. 1986. A Checklist of New York State Plants. Albany, NY: State Department of Education. Bulletin No. 458. 272 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1985. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. Pages 101–129 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Volume I: Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Retzinger, E. J. Jr. 1984. Growth and development of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) selections. Weed Sci. 32: 608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoner, C. A., Norris, R. F., and Chilcote, N. 1978. Yellow foxtail (Setaria lutescens) biotype studies: growth and morphological characteristics-Weed Sci. 26: 632–636.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. 1993. Late-season interference of spurred anoda in chile peppers. Weed Sci. 41: 172–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. T. and Cooley, A. W. 1973. Spurred anoda (starweed)-seedling establishment and control in cotton. Pages 20–22 in Weed and Herbicide Research in West Texas, 1971–73. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Consolidated (Progress Report) PR-3204.Google Scholar
Solano, F., Schrader, J. W., and Coble, H. D. 1976a. Control of spurred anoda in cotton. Weed Sci. 24: 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solano, F., Schrader, J. W., and Coble, H. D. 1976b. Germination, growth, and development of spurred anoda. Weed Sci. 24: 574–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1994a. Germination characteristics of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 42: 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. R., Thill, D. C., and Shafii, B. 1994b. Growth and competitiveness of sulfonylurea-resistant and -susceptible kochia (Kochia scoparia). Weed Sci. 42: 172–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. and Westra, P. 1997. Economics and efficacy of post-emergence spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) control in pinto beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 11: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. 1981. The relative competitiveness of atrazine susceptible and resistant populations of Chenopodium album and C. strictum . Can. J. Bot. 59: 689–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westra, P. 1992. 1993 weed control update. Proc. Colo. Crop Prot. Inst. 22: 70.Google Scholar
Wunderlin, R. P. 1982. Guide to the Vascular Plants of Central Florida. Tampa, FL: University Presses of Florida, p. 255.Google Scholar