Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T05:23:53.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cocklebur Control in Soybeans as Affected by Cultivars, Seeding Rates, and Methods of Weed Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. G. Mcwhorter  and
W. L. Barrentine
C. G. Mcwhorter
Affiliation:
Plant Physiol. S. Weed Sci. Lab., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agr., and the Delta Branch, Mississippi Agr. and Forest. Exp. Sta., Respectively, Stoneville, MS 38776
W. L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Plant Physiol. S. Weed Sci. Lab., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agr., and the Delta Branch, Mississippi Agr. and Forest. Exp. Sta., Respectively, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Four field experiments were conducted to study the effects of row width, cultivation, soybean population, soybean cultivar, and herbicides on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yields and control of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.). When the same herbicide practices were applied to all treatments, common cocklebur was controlled better in soybeans planted in 100-cm rows and grown with cultivation than in those planted in 18 or 33-cm rows and grown without cultivation. Increased soybean yields and better common cocklebur control were obtained when soybean populations were increased from 80,000 to 350,000 plants/ha. Common cocklebur reduced the yield of ‘Bragg’, one of the most competitive cultivars, 7% when grown in 100-cm rows with cultivation and 39% when grown in 33-cm rows without cultivation. The yields of six other cultivars were reduced about 20% in 100-cm rows and 32% to 52% in 33-cm rows. Cross cultivation controlled common cocklebur more effectively than did conventional cultivation in 100-cm rows, but cross cultivation was not advantageous when metribuzin [4-amino-6-tert-butyl-3-(methylthio)-as-triazine-5(4H)one] and bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] were applied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , September 1975 , pp. 386 - 390
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Burnside, O.C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294–297.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O.C. and Colville, W.L. 1964. Soybean and weed yield as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage and amiben. Weeds 12:109–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Caviness, C.E. and Johnson, D.L. 1972. Drilled and conventional row width soybean culture. Ark. Farm Res. 21(3):3.Google Scholar
4. Hartwig, E.E. 1957. Row width and rates of planting in the southern states. Soybean Digest 17:13–14, 16.Google Scholar
5. Kust, C.A. and Smith, R.R. 1969. Interaction of linuron and row spacing for control of yellow foxtail and barnyardgrass in soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:489–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Leffel, R.C. and Barber, G.W. Jr. 1961. Row widths and seeding rates in soybeans. Maryland Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 470. 18 pp.Google Scholar
7. McClelland, C.K. 1940. Methods and rates of planting soybeans. Ark. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 390. 18 pp.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C.G. and Hartwig, E.E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
9. Peters, E.J., Gebhardt, M.R., and Stritzke, J.F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacings, cultivations, and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 13:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Probst, A.H. 1945. Influence of spacing on yield and other characters in soybeans. Agron. J. 37:549–554.Google Scholar
11. Rogers, H.T. 1960. Spacing experiments in Alabama. Proc. Advis. Board Nat. Soybean Crop Impr. Council 11:9–10.Google Scholar
12. Russell, W.J., Fehr, W.R., and Mitchell, R.L. 1971. Effects of row cultivation on growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 63:772–774.Google Scholar
13. Wax, L.M. and Pendleton, J.W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.Google Scholar
14. Weber, C.R. 1953. Guide to higher soybean yields. Iowa Agr. Ext. Serv. Pamphlet 202. 3 pp.Google Scholar
15. Weber, C.R. and Staniforth, D.W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.Google Scholar
16. Wiggans, J.R. 1939. Influence of space and arrangement on the production of soybean plants. Agron. J. 31:314–321.Google Scholar