Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:40:05.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clopyralid Effects on Shoot Emergence, Root Biomass, and Secondary Shoot Regrowth Potential of Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

William W. Donald
William W. Donald*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric, Metabolism & Radiation Res. Lab. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The root fresh weight of intact Canada thistle plants was greater than that of decapitated plants 2 months following soil surface treatment with clopyralid at 140 g ai/ha. Nevertheless, secondary shoot regrowth potential was reduced to the same extent for both intact and decapitated plants after clopyralid treatment. Soil-applied clopyralid did not reduce root biomass as much as it reduced secondary shoot regrowth potential from adventitious root buds. Increasing the clopyralid rate from 11 to 1120 g/ha progressively reduced the total number of emerged shoots more than root fresh weight 2 months after treatment of decapitated Canada thistle. Increasing the clopyralid rate also reduced the regrowth potential of secondary shoots from root buds proportionately more than it reduced root biomass. Secondary shoots emerging through a surface layer of soil treated with clopyralid at 140 g/ha absorbed phytotoxic amounts of clopyralid. Secondary shoot numbers were not reduced after emerging through an activated charcoal layer into herbicide-treated soil, but they were deformed and their dry weight was reduced as was later secondary shoot regrowth potential.

Keywords

Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. # CIRAR ‘integrifolium’ Wimm. and Grabclopyralid, 3,6-dichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidHerbicideadventitious root budperennial weed
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 6 , November 1988 , pp. 804 - 809
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alley, H. P. 1976. Canada thistle control. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 10–11.Google Scholar
2. Amor, R. L. and Harris, R. V. 1975. Seedling establishment and vegetative spread of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in Victoria, Australia. Weed Res. 15:407–411.Google Scholar
3. Blankendaal, M., Hodgson, R. H., Davis, D. G., Hoerauf, R. A., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1972. Growing plants without soil for experimental use. U.S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ. 1251. 17 pp.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W. and Meyer, R. E. 1981. Effects of 2,4,5-T, triclopyr, and 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid on crop seedlings. Weed Sci. 29:256–261.Google Scholar
5. Brown, J. G. and Uprichard, S. D. 1976. Control of problem weeds in cereals with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid and mixtures with phenoxy herbicides. Proc. 1976 Br. Crop Protection Conf. – Weeds. Pages 119–125.Google Scholar
6. Carlson, S. J. and Donald, W. W. 1988. Glyphosate effects on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) roots, root buds, and shoots. Weed Res. 28:37–45.Google Scholar
7. Devine, M. D. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and chlorsulfuron in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci. 33:524–530.Google Scholar
8. Donald, W. W. 1984. Chlorsulfuron effects on shoot growth and root buds of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 32:42–50.Google Scholar
9. Donald, W. W. 1987. Effect of soil-applied chlorsulfuron on Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root and root bud growth. Weed Technol. 1:154–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Galoux, M. P., Bernes, A. C., and Van Damme, J. C. 1985. Gas chromatographic determination of 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid residues in soils and its application to the residue dissipation in a soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 33:965–968.Google Scholar
11. Gilchrist, A. J. and Lake, C. T. 1978. The development of 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid as a tankmix and/or sequential application for the control of annual and perennial weeds in sugar beet. Proc. 1978 Br. Crop Protection Conf.-Weeds. Pages 285–292.Google Scholar
12. Hall, J. C., Bestman, H. D., Devine, M. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1985. Contribution of soil spray deposition from postemergence herbicide applications to control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:836–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Hamdoun, A. M. 1970. The anatomy of subterranean structures of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 10:284–287.Google Scholar
14. Hamdoun, A. M. 1972. Regenerative capacity of root fragments of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 12:128–136.Google Scholar
15. Hayden, A. 1934. Distribution and reproduction of Canada thistle in Iowa. Am. J. Bot. 21:355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Hodgson, J. M. 1968. The nature, ecology, and control of Canada thistle. U.S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1386. 32 pp.Google Scholar
17. Hodgson, J. M. 1971. Canada thistle and its control. U.S. Dep. Agric. Leaflet 52. 8 pp.Google Scholar
18. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. Pages 217–224.Google Scholar
19. Holm, L., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P., and Plucknett, D. L. 1979. A Geographical Atlas of World Weeds. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 391 pp.Google Scholar
20. Keys, C. H. 1975. Evaluation of Dowco 290 for the control of annual and perennial weeds. Down Earth 31(1):1–7.Google Scholar
21. Lake, C. T. 1980. 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid for the control of creeping thistle (Cirsium arvense) and annual composite weeds in vegetable crops. Proc. 1980 Br. Crop Protection Conf. – Weeds. Pages 107–114.Google Scholar
22. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds 13:Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:1033–1048.Google Scholar
23. Moore, R. G. and Frankton, C. 1974. The Thistles of Canada. Can. Dep. Agric. Monogr. 10. 112 pp.Google Scholar
24. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1982. Selective control of Canada thistle in rapeseed with 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62:989–993.Google Scholar
25. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Absorption and translocation of 14C-3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. Weed Res. 24:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. O'Sullivan, P. A. and Kossatz, V. C. 1984. Control of Canada thistle and tolerance of barley to 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:215–217.Google Scholar
27. Pik, A. J., Peake, E., Strosher, M. T., and Hodgson, G. W. 1977. Fate of 3,6-dichloropicolinic acid in soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25:1054–1061.Google Scholar
28. Rea, B. L., Palmer, R. A., and de St. Blanquat, A. 1976. Weed control in rapeseed with benazolin ester/3,6-dichloropicolinic acid mixtures. Proc. 1976 Br. Crop Protection Conf. – Weeds. Pages 517–524.Google Scholar
29. Rogers, C. J. 1928. Canada thistle and Russian knapweed and their control. Colo. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 348. 44 pp.Google Scholar
30. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
31. Turnbull, G. C. and Stephenson, G. R. 1985. Translocation of clopyralid and 2,4-D in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 33:143–147.Google Scholar
32. Whitesides, R. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1978. Canada thistle response to Dowco 290. Down Earth 35:14–17.Google Scholar