Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T21:51:05.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atrazine Efficacy and Longevity as Affected by Tillage, Liming, and Fertilizer Type

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steve W. Lowder
Affiliation:
CIBA-Geigy Corp., Greensboro, NC
Jerome B. Weber
Affiliation:
Weed Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27607

Abstract

Efficacy of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] applied preemergence to no-tillage and conventional-tillage corn (Zea mays L.) was studied in the field for 2 yr at two locations. Other variables examined were lime treatments, atrazine rates, and acid-forming (NH4NO3) vs. nonacid-forming (NaNO3) nitrogen fertilizers. Mean surface soil pH levels during the growing season were higher with no-tillage than conventional tillage, because of the retention of lime in the surface in no-tillage vs. mixing it with the soil in conventional tillage, but there was no consistent increase in atrazine efficacy or longevity in one system over the other. Liming significantly increased atrazine efficacy and longevity in both no-tillage and conventional-tillage systems. Increased rates of atrazine increased weed control and longevity of the herbicide. Use of NaNO3 as a nitrogen source resulted in increased atrazine efficacy and longevity as compared with use of NH4NO3 during the first year, which was relatively dry, but had no effect during the second year, which was relatively wet.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Armstrong, D. E. and Chesters, G. 1967. Atrazine hydrolysis in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:6166.Google Scholar
2. Best, J. A. and Weber, J. B. 1974. Disappearance of s-triazines as affected by soil pH using a balance-sheet approach. Weed Sci. 22:364373.Google Scholar
3. Best, J. A., Weber, J. B., and Monaco, T. J. 1975. Influence of soil pH on s-triazine availability to plants. Weed Sci. 23:378382.Google Scholar
4. Harris, C. I. 1966. Adsorption, movement, and phytotoxicity of monuron and s-triazine herbicides in soil. Weeds 14:610.Google Scholar
5. Harris, C. I. 1967. Fate of 2-chloro-s-triazines in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 15:157162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Kells, J. J., Blevins, R. L., Rieck, C. E., and Muir, W. M. 1980. Effect of pH, nitrogen, and tillage on weed control and corn yield. Weed Sci. 28:719722.Google Scholar
7. Kells, J. J., Rieck, C. E., Blevins, R. L., and Muir, W. M. 1980. Atrazine dissipation as affected by surface pH and tillage. Weed Sci. 28:101104.Google Scholar
8. McGlamery, M. D. and Slife, F. W. 1966. The adsorption and desorption of atrazine as affected by pH, temperature and concentrations. Weeds 14:237239.Google Scholar
9. Nearpass, D. C. 1965. Effects of soil acidity on the adsorption, penetration, and persistance of simazine. Weeds 13:341346.Google Scholar
10. Peters, R. A. 1972. Control of weeds in no-tillage crops. Pages 132140 in No-Tillage Systems Symposium Proceedings. Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
11. Putnam, A. R. and DeFrank, J. 1980. Weed control benefits from cover crop residues in no-tillage culture of vegetables. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 35.Google Scholar
12. Robinson, L. R., and Wittmuss, H. D. 1973. Evaluation of herbicides for use in zero and minimized tilled corn and sorghum. Agron. J. 65:283286.Google Scholar
13. Schnappinger, M. G., Trapp, C. P., Boyd, J. M., and Pruss, S. W. 1977. Soil pH and triazine activity in no-tillage corn as affected by nitrogen and lime applications. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:116.Google Scholar
14. Shear, G. M. and Moschler, W. W. 1969. Continuous corn by the no-tillage and conventional tillage methods: A six-year comparison. Agron. J. 61:524527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Skipper, H. D., Gilmour, C. M., and Furtick, W. R. 1967. Microbial versus chemical degradation of atrazine in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:653656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Slack, C. H., Blevins, R. L., and Rieck, C. E. 1978. Effect of soil pH and tillage on persistence of simazine. Weed Sci. 26:145148.Google Scholar
17. Southern Weed Science Society. 1977. Research Methods in Weed Science. Auburn Printing Co., Auburn, AL. 68 pp.Google Scholar
18. Triplett, G. B., and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20:453457.Google Scholar
19. United States Department of Agriculture. 1975. Minimum tillage: A preliminary technology assessment. Office of Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC. 34 pp.Google Scholar
20. Weber, J. B. 1970. Mechanisms of adsorption of s-triazine by clay colloids and factors affecting plant availability. Residue Revs. 32:93130.Google Scholar
21. Weber, J. B. 1970. Adsorption of s-triazines by montmorillonite as a function of pH and molecular structure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:401404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Weber, J. B. 1977. Soil properties, herbicide sorption, and model soil systems. Pages 6072 in Truelove, B., ed., Research Methods in Weed Science, South. Weed Sci. Soc, Auburn Printing Co., Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
23. Weber, J. B. and Best, J. A. 1972. Activity and movement of 13 soil-applied herbicides as influenced by soil reaction. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:403413.Google Scholar
24. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Ibaraki, K. 1968. Effect of pH on the phytotoxicity of prometryne applied, to synthetic soil media. Weed Sci. 16:134136.Google Scholar
25. Weber, J. B., Weed, S. B., and Ward, T. M. 1969. Absorption of s-triazines by soil organic matter. Weed Sci. 17:417421.Google Scholar