Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T05:22:06.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of the Ascorbate–Glutathione Cycle in Paraquat Tolerance of Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Tai-You Tseng
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung-Hsing University, 250 Kuokuang Road, Taichung City, Taiwan
Jen-Fu Ou
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung-Hsing University, 250 Kuokuang Road, Taichung City, Taiwan
Ching-Yuh Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung-Hsing University, 250 Kuokuang Road, Taichung City, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: cywang@nchu.edu.tw

Abstract

Out of 1,343 mutant lines of rice mutated by sodium azide from the parental Japonica-type variety ‘Tainung 67’ (TNG67), a paraquat-susceptible line 1192 and a paraquat-tolerant line 72 were selected using whole seedlings at the four-leaf stage and leaf segments at the tillering stage as test materials. Further selection from progenies of these two mutant lines yielded the susceptible 1192-11 (S) and tolerant 72-16 (T), which were studied herein. Chlorophyll fluorescence, electrolyte leakage, and lipid peroxidation were measured for leaf segments of rice following treatment with 0.1 mM paraquat. A comparison of these responses among the three rice lines (TNG67, 72-16, and 1192-11), revealed a higher tolerance to paraquat in the tolerant mutant line 72-16 and the parental variety TNG67 than in the susceptible mutant 1192-11. Analysis of the antioxidative system in paraquat-treated leaf segments showed that the reduced form of glutathione (GSH) and the ratio of GSH to total glutathione increased by 3.5-fold within 6 h after treatment (HAT) and up to 5-fold 9 HAT in the T line, as compared with the S line. In view of the high activities of both dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and glutathione reductase (GR) in paraquat-treated leaves of TNG67 and the T line, the antioxidative effect of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle is hereby proposed to play an essential role in paraquat tolerance of rice. Pretreatment of rice segments with spermine enhanced DHAR and GR activities as well as paraquat tolerance of the S line. These results suggest that the activity of ascorbate–glutathione cycle induced by spermine is involved in rice tolerance to this herbicide. Although kinetics studies showed no significant difference among the three rice lines in paraquat inhibition of GR, a lower affinity of enzyme to substrate (Km) in TNG67 and the T line and a higher maximal reaction rate (Vmax) in the T line for the oxidized glutathione substrate (GSSG) were detected. These observations further implicate the importance of glutathione reductase in paraquat tolerance of rice.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ahn, S. M. and Jin, C. D. 2004. Protective role of exogenous spermidine against paraquat toxicity in radish chloroplasts. J. Plant Biol. 47:338347.Google Scholar
Ananieva, E. A., Christov, K. N., and Popova, L. P. 2004. Exogenous treatment with salicylic acid leads to increased antioxidant capacity in leaves of barley plants exposed to paraquat. J. Plant Physiol. 16:319328.Google Scholar
Asada, K. 1999. The water–water cycle in chloroplasts: scavenging of active oxygens and dissipation of excess photons. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50:601639.Google Scholar
Benavides, M. P., Gallego, S. M., Comba, M. E., and Tomaro, M. L. 2000. Relationship between polyamines and paraquat toxicity in sunflower leaf discs. Plant Growth Regul. 31:215224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, C., Montagu, V. M., and Inze, D. 1992. Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 43:83116.Google Scholar
Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein–dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72:247254.Google Scholar
Chagas, R. M., Silveira, J.A.G., Ribeiro, R. V., Vitorello, V. A., and Carrer, H. 2008. Photochemical damage and comparative performance of superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase in sugarcane leaves exposed to paraquat-induced oxidative stress. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 90:181188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, C. J. and Kao, C. H. 1997. Paraquat toxicity is reduced by polyamines in rice leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 22:163168.Google Scholar
Chattopadhayay, M. K., Tiwari, B. S., Chattopadhyay, G., Bose, A., Sengupta, D. N., and Ghosh, B. 2002. Protective role of exogenous polyamines on salinity-stressed rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Physiol. Plant. 116:192199.Google Scholar
Chiang, Y. J., Wu, Y. X., Chiang, M. Y., and Wang, C. Y. 2008. Role of antioxidative system in paraquat resistance of tall fleabane (Conyza sumatrensis). Weed Sci. 56:350355.Google Scholar
Chun, J. C., Ma, S. Y., Kim, S. E., and Lee, H. J. 1997. Physiological responses of Rehmannia glutinosa to paraquat and its tolerance mechanisms. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 59:5163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, S., Lu, Q., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Wen, X., Zhang, L., and Lu, C. 2009. Enhanced sensitivity to oxidative stress in transgenic tobacco plants with decreased glutathione reductase activity leads to a decrease in ascorbate pool and ascorbate redox state. Plant Mol. Biol. 69:577592.Google Scholar
Dowd, J. E. and Riggs, D. S. 1965. A comparison of estimates of Michaelis–Menten kinetic constants from various linear transformations. J. Biol. Chem. 240:563569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duan, J., Li, J., Guo, S., and Kang, Y. 2008. Exogenous spermidine affects polyamine metabolism in salinity-stressed Cucumis sativus roots and enhances short-term salinity tolerance. J. Plant Physiol. 165:16201635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekmekci, Y. and Terzioglu, S. 2005. Effects of oxidative stress induced by paraquat on wild and cultivated wheats. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 83:6981.Google Scholar
Foyer, C. H., Descourvieres, P., and Kunert, K. J. 1994. Protection against oxygen radicals: an important defense mechanism studied in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 17:507523.Google Scholar
Foyer, C. H., Lopez-Delgado, H., Dat, J. F., and Scott, I. M. 1997. Hydrogen peroxide- and glutathione-associated mechanisms of acclimatory stress tolerance and signalling. Physiol. Plant. 100:241254.Google Scholar
Groppa, M. D., Tomaro, M. L., and Benavides, M. P. 2001. Polyamines as protectors against cadmium or copper-induced oxidative damage in sunflower leaf discs. Plant Sci. 161:481488.Google Scholar
Guo, Z., Huang, M., Lu, S., Yaqing, Z., and Zhong, Q. 2007. Differential response to paraquat induced oxidative stress in two rice cultivars on antioxidants and chlorophyll a fluorescence. Acta Physiol. Plant. 29:3946.Google Scholar
Hung, K. T., Chang, C. J., and Kao, C. H. 2002. Paraquat toxicity is reduced by nitric oxide in rice leaves. J. Plant Physiol. 159:159166.Google Scholar
Iannelli, M. A., Breusegem, F. V., Montagu, M. V., Inzé, D., and Massacci, A. 1999. Tolerance to low temperature and paraquat-mediated oxidative stress in two maize genotypes. J. Exp. Bot. 50:523532.Google Scholar
Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Escuredo, P. R., Arrese-Igor, C., and Becana, M. 1998. Oxidative damage in pea plants exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant Physiol. 116:173181.Google Scholar
Jiménez, A., Hernández, J. A., Delrio, L. A., and Sevilla, F. 1997. Evidence for the presence of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle in mitochondria and peroxisomes of pea leaves. Plant Physiol. 118:13271335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. S. and Jin, C. D. 2006. Polyamines as antioxidant protectors against paraquat damage in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) cotyledons. J. Plant Biol. 49:237246.Google Scholar
Kuk, Y. I., Shin, J. S., Jung, H. I., Guh, J. O., Jung, S., and Burgos, N. R. 2006. Mechanism of paraquat tolerance in cucumber leaves of various ages. Weed Sci. 54:615.Google Scholar
Kuthanová, A., Gemperlová, L., Zelenková, S., Eder, J., Macháčková, I., Opatrný, Z. and Cvikrová, M. 2004. Cytological changes and alterations in polyamine contents induced by cadmium in tobacco BY-2 cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 42:149156.Google Scholar
Lee, H. J. and Wilson, I. B. 1971. Enzymic parameters: measurement of V and Km . Biochim. Biophys. Acta 242:519522.Google Scholar
Ma, Y. H., Ma, F. W., Zhang, J. K., Li, M. J., Wang, Y. H., and Liang, D. 2008. Effects of high temperature on activities and gene expression of enzymes involved in ascorbate–glutathione cycle in apple leaves. Plant Sci. 175:761766.Google Scholar
May, M. J., Vernoux, T., Leaver, C., Montagu, M. V., and Inze, D. 1998. Glutathione homeostasis in plants: implications for environmental sensing and plant development. J. Exp. Bot. 49:649667.Google Scholar
Nayyar, H. and Chander, S. 2004. Protective effects of polyamines against oxidative stress induced by water and cold stress in chickpea. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 190:355365.Google Scholar
Noctor, G. and Foyer, C. H. 1998. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49:249279.Google Scholar
Norman, M. A. and Fuerst, E. P. 1997. Interactions of cations with paraquat in leaf sections of resistant and sensitive biotypes of Conyza bonariensis . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 57:181191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant Protection Manual. 2010. Agricultural Chemicals and Toxic Substances Research Institute, Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan. 11, Guangming Rd., Wufong, Taichung 41358, Taiwan. http://www.tactri.gov.tw/e-intro.asp. Accessed January 01, 2012.Google Scholar
Polos, E., Mikulas, J., Szigeti, Z., Matkovics, B., Hai, D. Q., Parducz, A., and Lehoczki, E. 1988. Paraquat and atrazine co-resistance in Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 30:142154.Google Scholar
Prasad, K.V.S.K., Saradhi, P. P., and Sharmila, P. 1999. Concerted action of antioxidant enzymes and curtailed growth under zinc toxicity in Brassica juncea . Environ. Exp. Bot. 42:110.Google Scholar
Purba, E., Preston, C., and Powles, S. B. 1995. The mechanism of resistance to paraquat is strongly temperature dependent in resistant Hordeum leporinum Link and H. glaucum Steud. Planta 196:464468.Google Scholar
Seyfried, J., Soldner, F., Schulz, J. B., Klockgether, T., Kovar, K. A., and Wüllner, U. 1999. Differential effects of l-buthionine sulfoximine and ethacrynic acid on glutathione levels and mitochondrial function in PC12 cells. Neurosci. Lett. 264:14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaaltiel, Y., Glazer, A., Bocion, P. F., and Gressel, J. 1988. Cross tolerance to herbicidal and environmental oxidants of plant biotypes tolerant to paraquat, sulfur dioxide, and ozone. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 31:1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaaltiel, Y. and Gressel, J. 1986. Multienzyme oxygen radical detoxification system correlated with paraquat resistance in Conyza bonariensis . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 26:2228.Google Scholar
Shalata, A. and Neumann, P. M. 2001. Exogenous ascorbic acid (vitamin C) increases resistance to salt stress and reduces lipid peroxidation. J. Exp. Bot. 52:22072211.Google Scholar
Smith, I. K. 1985. Stimulation of glutathione synthesis in photorespiring plants by catalase inhibitors. Plant Physiol. 79:10441047.Google Scholar
Vinson, J. A., Hao, Y., Su, X., and Zubik, L. 1998. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods: vegetables. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:36303634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. S., Tseng, T. H., and Lin, C. Y. 2002. Rice biotech research at the Taiwan Agriculture. Research Institute. Asia–Pacific Biotech News 6:950956.Google Scholar
Whiteley, C. G. 1997. Enzyme kinetics: partial and complete competitive inhibition. Biochem. Educ. 25:144146.Google Scholar
Ye, B. and Gressel, J. 2000. Transient, oxidant-induced antioxidant transcript and enzyme levels correlate with greater oxidant-resistance in paraquat-resistant Conyza bonariensis . Planta 211:5061.Google Scholar
Yu, Q., Cairns, A., and Powles, S. B. 2004. Paraquat resistance in a population of Lolium rigidum . Funct. Plant Biol. 31:247254.Google Scholar