Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-zpsnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T17:50:17.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual Monuron, Diuron, and Simazine in a Vineyard Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. H. Dawson ,
V. F. Bruns  and
W. J. Clore
J. H. Dawson
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, Washington
V. F. Bruns
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, Washington
W. J. Clore
Affiliation:
Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One year after the last of six annual applications of 3-(p-chlorophenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea (monuron) at 2.4, 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea (diuron) at 2.4 and 7.2, and 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) at 1.0 and 3.0 lb/A in a furrow-irrigated vineyard on Warden silt loam, a bioassay using oats (Avena sativa L., var. Kanota) as the indicator showed that 1.6, 2.8, 10.6, 0.6, and 2.0 lb/A, respectively, remained in the surface 12 in of soil. Of the total, 62 to 89% was located in the surface 2 in and 86 to 100% was in the surface 4 in. Three years after the last of four annual applications of monuron at 7.2 lb/A, 0.8 lb/A remained in the surface 12 in.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1968 , pp. 63 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 1968 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F., Milller, J. H., and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Disappearance of herbicides from irrigated soil. Weeds 13:56–60.Google Scholar
2. Ashton, Floyd M. 1961. Movement of herbicides in soil with simulated furrow irrigation. Weeds 9:612–619.Google Scholar
3. Bruns, V. F., Clore, W. J., and Dawson, J. H. 1962. Weed control in asparagus with monuron and diuron. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 635. 15 p.Google Scholar
4. Burschel, P. 1961. Untersuchungen über das Verhalten von Simazin im Boden. Weed Res. 1:131–141.Google Scholar
5. Danielson, L. L. 1956. The crop toxicity period of CMU in a sandy clay loam soil. Weeds 4:255–263.Google Scholar
6. Dawson, J. H., Clore, W. J., and Bruns, V. F. 1967. Response of Concord grapes and weeds to six annual applications of monuron, diuron, and simazine. Washington Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 680. 10 p.Google Scholar
7. Grover, R. 1966. Influence of organic matter, texture, and available water on the toxicity of simazine in soil. Weeds 14:148–151.Google Scholar
8. Harris, C. I. and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Influence of soil properties on adsorption and phytotoxicity of CIPC, diuron, and simazine. Weeds 13:215–219.Google Scholar
9. Harris, C. I. and Warren, G. F. 1964. Adsorption and desorption of herbicides by soil. Weeds 12:120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Hill, G. D., McGahen, J. W., Baker, H. M., Finnerty, D. W., and Bingeman, C. W. 1955. The fate of substituted urea herbicides in agricultural soils. Agron. J. 47:93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Loustalot, A. J., Muzik, T. J., and Cruzado, H. J. 1953. A study of the persistence of CMU in soil. Agr. Chem. 8:52–53, 99–101.Google Scholar
12. Ogle, R. E. and Warren, G. F. 1954. Fate and activity of herbicides in soils. Weeds 3:257–273.Google Scholar
13. Rahn, E. M. and Baynard, Robert E. Jr. 1958. Persistence and penetration of monuron in asparagus soils. Weeds 6:432–440.Google Scholar
14. Roadhouse, F. E. B. and Birk, L. A. 1961. Penetration of and persistence in soil of the herbicide 2-chloro-4,6-bis-(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine). Can. J. Plant Sci. 41:252–260.Google Scholar
15. Sheets, T. J. 1958. The comparative toxicities of four phenylurea herbicides in several soil types. Weeds 6:413–424.Google Scholar
16. Sheets, T. J. 1959. The comparative toxicities of monuron and simazin in soil. Weeds 7:189–194.Google Scholar
17. Sheets, T. J. and Crafts, A. S. 1957. The phytotoxicity of four phenylurea herbicides in soils. Weeds 5:93–101.Google Scholar
18. Sheets, T. J., Crafts, Alden S., and Drever, H. R. 1962. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicities of the s-triazine herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:458–462.Google Scholar
19. Sherburne, H. R. and Freed, V. H. 1954. Soil effects on herbicides—adsorption of 3(p-chlorophenyl)-l,l-dimethylurea as a function of soil constituents. J. Agr. Food Chem. 2:937–939.Google Scholar
20. Upchurch, R. P. and Mason, D. D. 1962. The influence of soil organic matter on the phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weeds 10:9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Upchurch, R. P. and Pierce, W. C. 1957. The leaching of monuron from Lakeland sand soil. Part I. The effect of amount, intensity, and frequency of simulated rainfall. Weeds 5:321–330.Google Scholar
22. Weldon, L. W. and Timmons, F. L. 1961. Penetration and persistence of diuron in soil. Weeds 9:195–203.Google Scholar
23. Wiese, A. F. and Davis, R. G. 1964. Herbicide movement in soil with various amounts of water. Weeds 12:101–103.Google Scholar