Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T04:15:59.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relating Eriochloa villosa emergence to interference in Zea mays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James A. Mickelson  and
R. Gordon Harvey
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agronomy, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Critical period experiments were conducted in 1997 near Milton, WI, and in 1998 near Edgerton, WI, in which Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth emergence was characterized and related to Zea mays L. yield loss and weed seed production. At Milton, 2.7% of the spring seedbank emerged, and at Edgerton, 14.5% of the spring seedbank emerged. Peak time of E. villosa emergence occurred early in the season at both locations, accounting for 84% of the total season emergence at Milton by 37 d after planting and 90% of the total season emergence at Edgerton by 27 d after planting. A secondary peak in emergence occurred at each site, accounting for 14% of the total season emergence at Milton between 38 and 52 d after planting and 8% of the total season emergence at Edgerton between 28 and 43 d after planting. Following the secondary peak in emergence at each site, approximately 2% of the total season emergence occurred. Zea mays grain yield was reduced when E. villosa interfered with Z. mays past the V11 stage at Milton and the V3 stage at Edgerton. Zea mays yield reductions at Edgerton were greater, occurred under shorter periods of weed interference, and were associated with greater E. villosa biomass than yield reductions at Milton. Eriochloa villosa that emerged after the V2 Z. mays stage at Milton and the V3 stage at Edgerton did not cause crop yield loss; however, these plants produced seed at 143 and 63% of the initial spring seedbanks, respectively.

Keywords

Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth ERBVI, woolly cupgrassZea mays L., corn, ‘Cargill 4850 LL’ and ‘Cargill 3650 LL.’Weed emergenceweed seed productioncritical periodfecundityERBVI
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 5 , October 1999 , pp. 571 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bello, I. A. 1988. Seed Production and Germination Characteristics of Woolly Cupgrass [Eriochloa villosa (Thunb.) Kunth]. Ph.D. dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, IA. 135 p.Google Scholar
Bosnic, A. C. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zen mays). Weed Sci. 45:276–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikoye, D., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Influence of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) time of emergence and density on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 43:375–380.Google Scholar
Dieleman, A., Hamill, A. S., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Empirical models of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 43:612–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1998. Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd ed. New York: J. Wiley, pp. 33–34, 47–53, 89–96, 503–553.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Peterson, D. H., and Barbour, J. C. 1996. Timing and measurement of weed seed shed in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10:535–543.Google Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Dekker, J., et al. 1997. Weed seed bank emergence across the cornbelt. Weed Sci. 45:67–76.Google Scholar
Gallina, M. A. and Stephenson, G. R. 1992. Dissipation of [14C] glufosinate ammonium in two Ontario soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:165–168.Google Scholar
Ghosheh, H. Z., Holshouser, D. L., and Chandler, J. M. 1996. The critical period of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44:944–947.Google Scholar
Gutterman, Y. 1992. Maternal effects on seeds during development. Pages 27–59 in Fenner, M., ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. Wallingford, Great Britain: C.A.B. International.Google Scholar
Hall, M. R., Swanton, C. J., and Anderson, G. W. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441–447.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Buhler, D. D. 1998. Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 38:36.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. G. 1974. Susceptibility of seven annual grasses to herbicides. Weed Res. 14:51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Junttila, O. 1973. Seed and embryo germination in Syringa vulgaris and S. reflexa as affected by temperature during seed development. Physiol. Plant. 29:264–268.Google Scholar
Karssen, C. M. 1980/1981. Patterns of change in dormancy during burial of seeds in soil. Isr. J. Bot. 29:65–73.Google Scholar
Khan, A. A. and Karssen, C. M. 1980. Induction of secondary dormancy in Chenopodium bonus-henricus L. by osmotic and high temperature treatments and its prevention by light and growth regulators. Plant Physiol. 66:175–181.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. 1999. Relationships Among Woolly Cupgrass Emergence, Fecundity, and Seedbank Dynamics, and Their Impact on Management in Field Corn. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison. 142 p.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Effects of Eriochloa villosa density and time of emergence on growth and seed production in Zea mays . Weed Sci. In press.Google Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Boerboom, C. M. 1999. Seasonal abundance and spatial pattern of Setaria faberi, Chenopodium album, and Abutilon theophrasti in reduced-tillage soybeans. Weed Sci. 47:95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1997. Seed bank characterization and emergence of a weed community in a moldboard plow system. Weed Sci. 45:54–60.Google Scholar
Ovcharov, K. E. 1977. Physiological Basis of Seed Germination. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing, pp. 26–29.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1997a. Annual grass control in corn (Zea mays) with primisulfuron combined with nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 11:171–175.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1997b. Sequential applications control woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) and wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 11:537–542.Google Scholar
Rabaey, T. L., Harvey, R. G., and Albright, J. W. 1996. Herbicide timing and combination strategies for woolly cupgrass control in corn. J. Prod. Agric. 9:381–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuh, J. F. and Harvey, R. G. 1989. Woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in corn (Zea mays) with pendimethalin/triazine combinations and cultivation. Weed Sci. 37:405–411.Google Scholar
Schuh, J. F. and Harvey, R. G. 1991. Carbamothioate and chloroacetamide herbicides for woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:331–336.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E. 1988. Persistence and transformation of the herbicide [14C] glufosinate-ammonium in prairie soils under laboratory conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:393–397.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. and Hendricks, S. B. 1973. Phytochrome transformation and action in seeds of Rumex crispus L. during secondary dormancy. Plant Physiol. 52:475–479.Google Scholar