Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-rkxrd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:23:19.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistence of Three Dinitroaniline Herbicides on the Soil Surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. E. Savage  and
T. N. Jordan
K. E. Savage
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. and Delta Branch, Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
T. N. Jordan
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. and Delta Branch, Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rates of loss of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine), fluchloralin [N-(2-chloroethyl)-2,6-dinitro-N-propyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)aniline], and pendimethalin [N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] from soil surfaces were evaluated in a series of field sampling studies. Herbicides were sprayed onto soil enclosed in rings with nylon mesh bottoms, exposed to field conditions, and analyzed periodically by gas chromatography. The herbicides were lost rapidly in the first 3 to 5 days from Bosket silt loam and Sharkey clay, although the initial rate of loss was less rapid in the clay. Trifluralin and fluchloralin were lost more rapidly than pendimethalin. Half-life values for the first 3 to 5 days for trifluralin, fluchloralin, and pendimethalin, respectively, were 2, 1.5, and 4 days on silt loam and 2, 4, and 6 days on clay. Rates of loss were much lower for the remainder of the 7- or 12-day sampling periods. Rainfall on the first day of the sampling period resulted in increased initial loss of all herbicides. Shading from direct sunlight greatly reduced the loss of fluchloralin and pendimethalin as compared to exposure to full sunlight, although trifluralin loss remained fairly rapid under shaded conditions. Simulated rainfall on the first day resulted in significantly increased dissipation of fluchloralin and pendimethalin.

Keywords

Delayed incorporationtrifluralinfluchloralinpendimethalin
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 105 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F., Bowser, C. W., and McRae, G. N. 1962. Chemical control of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra) . Res. Prog. Rep. West. Weed Control Conf. p. 18.Google Scholar
2. Cords, H. P. and Badiei, A. A. 1964. Root reserves and susceptibility to systemic herbicides in two phreatophytes. Weeds 12:299–301.Google Scholar
3. Hughes, E. E. 1966. Single and combination mowing and spraying treatments for control of saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra Pall.) Weeds 14:276–278.Google Scholar
4. Hughes, E. E. 1966. Results of field applications of herbicides for control of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.). U.S. Dep. Agric, Agric. Res. Serv., ARS-34-79. 19 pp.Google Scholar
5. Hull, H. M. 1970. Leaf structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Residue Rev. 31:1–155.Google ScholarPubMed
6. Jellum, M. D. and Worthington, R. E. 1966. A rapid method of fatty acid analysis of oil from individual corn (Zea mays L.) kernels. Crop Sci. 6:251–252.Google Scholar
7. Martin, J. T. 1960. Determination of the components of plant cuticles. J. Sci. Food Agric. 11:635–640.Google Scholar
8. Quimby, P. C. Jr., Hollingsworth, E. B., and McDonald, R. L. 1977. Techniques for greenhouse evaluation of herbicides on saltcedar. Weed Sci. 25:1–4.Google Scholar
9. Swain, T. 1963. Chemical Plant Taxonomy. Acad. Press, New York. 543 pp.Google Scholar
10. Wilkinson, R. E. 1966. Seasonal development of anatomical structures of saltcedar foliage. Bot. Gaz. 127:231–234.Google Scholar
11. Wilkinson, R. E. 1966. Reproduction of saltcedar by cuttings. Weeds 14:173–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wilkinson, R. E. 1972. Sicklepod hydrocarbon response to photoperiod. Phytochemistry 11:1273–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Sicklepod surface wax response to photoperiod and S-(2,3-dichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate (Diallate.). Plant Physiol. 53:269–275.Google Scholar
14. Wilkinson, R. E. and Kasperbauer, M. J. 1972. Epicuticular alkane content of tobacco as influenced by photoperiod, temperature, and leaf age. Phytochemistry 11:2439–2442.Google Scholar