Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:39:13.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Numerical Taxonomic Study of Portulaca oleracea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. F. Gorske
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
A. M. Rhodes
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
H. J. Hopen
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

Abstract

A phenetic classification of 44 ecotypes of common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) produced 4 major groups: cool temperate; warm temperate to wet dry subtropic; humid subtropic to tropic; and cultivated. These groups were based on 36 plant characteristics; the ecotypes were collected from 18 countries and are representative of climates inhabited by common purslane. The cultivated group is comprised of robust forms which are raised for culinary purposes. For weed forms, plants of the cool temperate group were small, prostrate plants with size and growth habit increasing to maximum in the humid subtropic to tropic group.

Keywords

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Byrne, R. and McAndrews, J. H., 1975. Pre-columbian purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) in the New World. Nature 253 (5494):726727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chapman, J., Stewart, R. B., and Yarnell, R. A. 1974. Archaeological evidence for precolumbian introduction of Portulaca oleracea and Mollugo verticillata into eastern North America. Econ. Bot. 28:411412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Fernald, M. L. 1950. Gray's Manual of Botany, 8th edition. American Book Co., New York, pp. 609610.Google Scholar
4. Gleason, H. W. 1952. The new Britton and Brown illustrated flora of the Northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Vol. 2, Lancaster Press, Inc., Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 655 pp.Google Scholar
5. Harman, H. H. 1967. Modern Factor Analysis. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago and London. 474 pp.Google Scholar
6. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. U., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Univ. Press of Hawaii, Honolulu. pp. 7883.Google Scholar
7. Nie, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K., and Bent, D. H. 1975. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), 2nd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York. 675 pp.Google Scholar
8. Rohlf, F. J. 1968. Stereograms in numerical taxonomy. Syst. Zool. 17:246255.Google Scholar
9. Singh, K. P. 1972. Effects of different photoperiods on growth and flowering in Portulaca oleracea L. Curr. Sci. 41:573574.Google Scholar
10. Singh, K. P. 1973. Effect of temperature and light on seed germination of two ecotypes of Portulaca oleracea L. New Phytol. 72:289295.Google Scholar
11. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical taxonomy; the principles and practices of numerical classification. Freeman, San Francisco. 573 pp.Google Scholar
12. Vengris, J., Dunn, S., and Stacewicz-Sapuncakis, M. 1972. Life history studies as related to weed control in the northeast 7-Common Purslane. Agric. Exp. Stn. Coll. Food Nat. Res., Univ. of Massachusetts. 44 pp.Google Scholar
13. von Poellnitz, K. 1934. Versuch zur einer Monographic der Gattung Portulaca L. Repertorium specierum novarum regni begetabilis 37:240320. F. Gedde (publisher), Berlin-Dahlem.Google Scholar
14. Walker, W. M. 1936. The Troyville Mounds, Catahoula Parish, Louisiana. Bur Am. Ethnol., Bull. 113, 73 pp.Google Scholar
15. Watson, P. J. 1969. The prehistory of Salts Cave, Kentucky. Reports of investigation, No. 16. Illinois State Museum, Springfield, Illinois. 86 pp.Google Scholar