Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T12:10:26.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inheritance of picloram and 2,4-D resistance in wild mustard (Brassica kaber)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mithila Jugulam ,
Michael D. McLean  and
J. Christopher Hall
Mithila Jugulam
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Michael D. McLean
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The primary goal of this research was to determine the inheritance of cross-resistance to several groups of auxinic herbicides through classical genetic approaches using auxinic herbicide–resistant (R) and –susceptible (S) wild mustard biotypes obtained from western Canada. F1 progeny were raised from crosses between homozygous auxinic herbicide–R and –S wild mustard parental lines. The F1 and F2 populations were assessed for picloram (pyridine group) and 2,4-D (phenoxyalkanoic group) resistance or susceptibility. Analyses of the F1 as well as the F2 progeny indicate that a single dominant gene confers the resistance to picloram and 2,4-D similar to an earlier report of dicamba-based (benzoic acid group) resistance in this wild mustard biotype. Furthermore, analyses of backcross progeny in this species indicate that resistance to all three auxinic herbicides, i.e., picloram, dicamba, and 2,4-D, is determined by closely linked genetic loci. With this information on inheritance of resistance to several auxinic herbicide families, the R biotype of wild mustard offers an excellent system to isolate and characterize the auxinic herbicide–resistance gene.

Keywords

2,4-Dpicloramwild mustard, Brassica kaber (DC) L.C. Wheeler SINARAuxinic herbicidesherbicide resistanceinheritancenear-isogenic lines
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 417 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Darmency, H. 1994. Genetics of herbicide resistance in weeds and crops. Pages 263–297 in Powels, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.Google Scholar
Debreuil, D. J., Friesen, L. F., and Morrison, I. N. 1996. Growth and seed return of auxin-type herbicide resistant wild mustard (Brassica kaber) in wheat. Weed Sci 44:872–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, S. and Hall, J. C. 1995. Comparison of flash-induced light scattering transients and proton efflux from auxinic-herbicide resistant and susceptible wild mustard protoplasts: a possible role for calcium in mediating auxinic herbicide resistance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1244:69–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devine, M. D. and Shukla, A. 2000. Altered target site as a mechanism of herbicide resistance. Crop Prot 19:881–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estelle, M. A. and Sommerville, C. 1987. Auxin-resistant mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana with an altered morphology. Mol. Gen. Genet 206:200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gressel, J. and Segel, L. A. 1982. Interrelating factors controlling the rate of appearance of resistance: The outlook for the future. Pages 325–447 in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C., Alam, S. M. M., and Murr, D. P. 1993. Ethylene biosynthesis following foliar application of picloram to biotypes of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) susceptible or resistant to auxinic herbicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 47:36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. C. and Romano, M. L. 1995. Morphological and physiological differences between the auxinic herbicide-susceptible (S) and –resistant (R) wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotypes. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 52:149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L. M., Holtum, J. A. M., and Powles, S. B. 1994. Mechanisms responsible for cross resistance and multiple resistance. Pages 243–261 in Powels, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M. eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2003. International Survey of Herbicide-resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/in.asp.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. and Morrison, I. N. 1992. Resistance to auxin-type herbicides in wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L) populations in western Canada. Annual Meeting of Weed Science Society of America. 164 p. [Abstract #32].Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Brule-Babel, A. L., and Morrison, I. N. 1994. Inheritance of trifluralin resistance in green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci 42:123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Morrison, I. N., and Brule-Babel, A. L. 1995. Inheritance of dicamba resistance in wild mustard (Brassica kaber). Weed Sci 43:192–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, I. N. and Devine, M. D. 1994. Herbicide resistance in the Canadian Prairie Provinces: five years after the fact. Phytoprotection 75:(Suppl.). 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peever, T. L. and Milgroom, M. G. 1995. Fungal resistance-lessons for herbicide management. Weed Technol 9:840–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peniuk, M. G., Romano, M. L., and Hall, J. C. 1993. Physiological investigations into the resistance of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L) biotype to auxinic herbicide. Weed Res 33:431–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabba, R. P., Ray, I. M., Lownds, N., and Sterling, T. M. 2003. Inheritance of resistance to clopyralid and picloram in yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) is controlled by a single nuclear recessive gene. J. Hered 94:523–527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaaltiel, Y., Chua, N. H., Gepstein, S., and Gressel, J. 1988. Dominant pleitropy controls enzymes co-segregating with paraquat resistance in Conyza bonariensis . Theor. Appl. Genet 75:850–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterling, T. M. and Hall, J. C. 1997. Mechanism of action of natural auxins and the auxinic herbicides. Pages 111–141 in Roe, R. M., Burton, J. D., and Kuhr, R. J. eds. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS.Google Scholar
Strickberger, M. W. 1968. Probability and statistical testing. Pages 149–150 in Genetics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Van Eerd, L. L., Stephenson, S. R., and Hall, J. C. 2003. Inheritance of both quinlorac and thifensulfuron methyl resistance in a false cleaver (Galium spurium) biotype. Annual meeting of Weed Science Society of America (2003). 91 p. [Abstract #326].Google Scholar
Wang, Y. S., Deshpande, S., and Hall, J. C. 2001. Calcium may mediate auxinic herbicide resistance in wild mustard. Weed Sci 49:2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S. R. and Hall, J. C. 1995. Auxinic herbicide-resistant and susceptible wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) biotypes: effect of auxinic herbicides on seedling growth and auxin-binding activity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 52:137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamasue, Y., Kamiyama, K., Hanoika, Y., and Kusanagi, T. 1992. Paraquat resistance and its inheritance in seed germination of foliar resistant biotypes of Erigeron canadensis and E. sumatrensis . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 100:630–636.Google Scholar