Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:12:44.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Soil-Applied Herbicides on Ivyleaf Morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) Growth and Development in Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

James C. Holloway Jr.  and
David R. Shaw
James C. Holloway Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant and Soil Sci., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soil-applied imazaquin or chlorimuron plus metribuzin reduced ivyleaf morningglory photosynthetic rate, leaf area, biomass, and seed production per plant compared to the nontreated control. Photosynthetic rate of ivyleaf morningglory was reduced a minimum of 53%, and total leaf area was reduced at least 67% with either herbicide, regardless of ivyleaf morningglory densities. Ivyleaf morningglory biomass and seed production were reduced at least 62% with either herbicide across all ivyleaf morningglory densities. Soybean leaf area, photosynthetic rate, and biomass were not affected by herbicide treatment or ivyleaf morningglory densities of 2, 4, 6, or 8 per m of row.

Keywords

Chlorimuron, 2-[[[[(4-chloro-6-methoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)-amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]benzoic acidimazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidmetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-oneivyleaf morningglory, Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq. #3 IPOHEsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Terra-Vig 5452.’Photosynthesisleaf areabiomassseed productionchlorimuronimazaquinmetribuzinIpomoea hederacea
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 4 , December 1995 , pp. 655 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Anonymous. 1994. 1994 Weed control guidelines for Mississippi. Miss. Coop. Ext. Ser. Pub. and Miss. Ag. For. Exp. Stn. 1532.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Beyer, E. M., Duffy, M. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. Mode of action. Pages 164–181 in Kearney, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action. vol. 3. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. I. Sicklepod and tall morningglory. Weed Sci. 19:576–579.Google Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294–297.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27:562–565 Google Scholar
7. Burnside, O. C. and Colville, W. L. 1964. Soybean and weed yields affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12:109–112.Google Scholar
8. Burnside, O. C. and Moomaw, R. S. 1977. Control of weeds in narrow-row soybeans. Agron. J. 69:793–796.Google Scholar
9. Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), prickly sida (Sida spinosa), and Venice mallow (Hibiscus trionum) in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.Google Scholar
10. Cordes, R. C. and Bauman, T. T. 1984. Field competition between ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:364–370.Google Scholar
11. Crowley, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1982. Variations in seed production and response to pests of morningglory Ipomoea species and smallflower morningglory (Jacquemontia tamnifolia). Weed Sci. 30:187–190.Google Scholar
12. Dowler, C. C. 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:400–404.Google Scholar
13. Egley, G. H. 1986. Stimulation of weed seed germination in soil. Rev. Weed Sci. 2:67–89.Google Scholar
14. Elmore, C. D., Hurst, H. R., and Austin, D. F. 1990. Biology and control of morningglories (Ipomoea spp.). Rev. Weed Sci. 5:83–114.Google Scholar
15. Gomes, L. F., Chandler, J. M., and Vaughan, C. E. 1978. Aspects of germination, emergence and seed production of three Ipomoea taxa. Weed Sci. 26:245–248.Google Scholar
16. Green, J. M., Obrigawitch, T. T., Long, J. D., and Hutchinson, J. M. 1988. Metribuzin and chlorimuron mixtures for preemergence broadleaf weed control in soybeans, (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 2:355–363.Google Scholar
17. Hinson, C. and Hanson, W. D. 1962. Competition studies in soybeans. Crop Sci. 2:117–123.Google Scholar
18. Holloway, J. C. Jr., Shaw, D. R., and Ruscoe, J T. 1994 Soybean responses to ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) interference following soil-applied herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:222.Google Scholar
19. Houston, W. 1970. The ten worst weeds of field crops—morningglory. Crop Soils Mag. 23:9–10.Google Scholar
20. Howe, O. W. III. and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) row spacing on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference. Weed Sci. 35:185–193.Google Scholar
21. Johnston, T. J. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Contribution of leaves at different canopy levels to seed production of upright and lodged soybeans (Glycine max). Crop Sci. 8:291–293.Google Scholar
22. Johnston, T. J., Pendleton, J. W., Peters, C. B., and Hicks, D. R. 1969. Influence of supplemental light on apparent photosynthesis, yield, and yield components of soybeans. Crop Sci. 9:557–581.Google Scholar
23. Knake, E. L. 1972. Effect of shade on giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 20:588–592.Google Scholar
24. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.Google Scholar
25. Little, D. L. and Shaner, D. L. 1991. Absorption and translocation of the imidazolinone herbicides. Pages 54–69 in Shaner, D. L. and O'Conner, S. L. eds. The Imidazolinone Herbicides. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
26. McWhorter, C. G. and Barrentine, W. L. 1975. Cocklebur control in soybeans as affected by cultivars, seeding rates, and methods of weed control. Weed Sci. 23:386–390.Google Scholar
27. McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:56–59.Google Scholar
28. Monks, D. W. and Oliver, L. R. 1988. Interactions between soybean (Glycine max) cultivars and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 36:770–774.Google Scholar
29. Munger, P. H., Chandler, J. M., and Cothren, J. T. 1987. Effect of water stress on photosynthetic parameters of soybean (Glycine max) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 35:15–21.Google Scholar
30. Murdock, E. C., Banks, P. A., and Toler, J. E. 1986. Shade development effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) interference with soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 34:711–717.Google Scholar
31. Murphy, T. R. and Gossett, B. J. 1981. Influence of shading by soybeans (Glycine max) on weed suppression. Weed Sci. 29:610–615.Google Scholar
32. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.Google Scholar
33. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.Google Scholar
34. Oosterhuis, D. M., Wullschleger, S. D., Hampton, R. E., and Ball, R. A. 1990. Physiological response of rice (Oryza sativa) to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 38:459–462.Google Scholar
35. Santelmann, P. W., Meade, J. A., and Peters, R. A. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Scott, H. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. II. Development and distribution of root system. Weed Sci. 24:454–460.Google Scholar
37. Shaw, D. R. and Holloway, J. C. Jr. 1994. Soybean responses to ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea) interference following soil-applied herbicides. Proc. South. Soybean Conf. Pages 211–212. Am. Soybean Assoc., St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
38. Shaw, D. R. and Hydrick, D. E. 1993. Effect of imazaquin and chlorimuron plus metribuzin on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed production and germination. Weed Technol. 7:681–685.Google Scholar
39. Shaw, D.R., Wixson, M. B., and Smith, C.A. 1991. Effect of imazaquin and chlorimuron plus metribuzin on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 5:206–210.Google Scholar
40. Stahler, L. M. 1948. Shade and soil moisture as factors in competition between selected crops and field bindweed. Agron. J. 40:490–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1974. Dormancy changes and the fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil. Weed Sci. 22:151–155.Google Scholar
42. Stoller, E. W. and Woolley, J. T. 1985. Competition for light by broadleaf weeds in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 33:199–202.Google Scholar
43. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.Google Scholar
44. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationship in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.Google Scholar
45. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1979. Morningglory competition on soybeans. Weed Sci. 27:531–535.Google Scholar