Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Influence of Irrigation Timing on Disturbance-Induced Reductions in Soil Seedbank Density

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brian J. Schutte
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Nina Klypin
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Manoj K. Shukla
Affiliation:
Plant and Environmental Sciences Department, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Studies suggest that disturbance-induced reductions in soil seedbank density are diminished by periods of water scarcity after soil disturbance; however, this hypothesis has yet to be tested. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the effects of increasing time between soil disturbance and flood irrigation on disturbance-induced reductions in soil seedbank density, and (2) to identify specific soil moisture levels that cause seedbank reductions under flood irrigation. Weed species in this study were junglerice, Palmer amaranth, and yellow foxtail. For Objective 1, artificial seedbanks with known numbers of seeds were disturbed 10, 3, or 0 d prior to flood irrigations under field conditions. For Objective 2, seeds were buried in soil mesocosms that were hydrated to specific soil water potentials (flooded, 0 kPa, −30 kPa, −60 kPa, and −180 kPa) and placed in laboratory conditions favorable for germination. For both objectives, seeds were recovered to determine the percentages of buried seeds that survived the disturbance or moisture treatments. Results for the field study indicated that soil disturbances reduced seedbank persistence of Palmer amaranth but did not affect seedbank persistence of junglerice and yellow foxtail. Disturbance-induced reductions in seedbank density were greatest when soil was disturbed 0 and 3 d prior to flood irrigations. For the laboratory study, results showed that waterlogged soil was not required for seedbank losses because rates of seedbank persistence were greater in saturated soils (0 kPa and flooded) compared to the lower moisture levels. These studies indicate that delays in irrigation can reduce the seedbank reduction potentials of soil disturbance events. Further, irrigation timing effects on disturbed soil seedbanks are likely to occur in all irrigation systems, including those that reduce the amount of water applied compared to flood irrigation.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

Associate editor for this paper: William Vencill, University of Georgia

References

Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (2014) Seeds: Ecology, Biogeography, and Evolution of Dormancy and Germination. New York: Elsevier. 1586 pGoogle Scholar
Bekker, RM, Oomes, MJM, Bakker, JP (1998) The impact of groundwater level on soil seed bank survival Seed Sci Res 8:399404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benech-Arnold, RL, Sanchez, RA, Forcella, F, Kruk, BC, Ghersa, CM (2000) Environmental control of dormancy in weed seed banks in soil Field Crop Res 67:105122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrie, AMM, Paterson, J, West, HR (1974) Water content and responsivity of lettuce seeds to light Physiol Plant 31:9096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botto, JF, Scopel, AL, Sanchez, RA (2000) Water constraints on the photoinduction of weed seed germination during tillage Aust J Plant Physiol 27:463471 Google Scholar
Calderon, FJ, Jackson, LE, Scow, KM, Rolston, DE (2000) Microbial responses to simulated tillage in cultivated and uncultivated soils Soil Biol Biochem 32:15471559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B, Mohler, CL (2001) Stale seedbed practices for vegetable production Hortscience 36:703705 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Abugho, SB (2013) Effect of crop residue on seedling emergence and growth of selected weed species in a sprinkler-irrigated zero-rill dry-seeded rice system Weed Sci 61:403409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2009a) Influence of tillage systems on weed seedling emergence pattern in rainfed rice Soil Till Res 106:1521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Johnson, DE (2009b) Seed germination ecology of junglerice (Echinochloa colona) : A major weed of rice Weed Sci 57:235240 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comes, RD, Bruns, VF, Kelley, AD (1978) Longevity of certain weed and crop seeds in fresh water Weed Sci 26:336344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, RMM (1977) Tolerance of anoxia and ethanol metabolism in germinating seeds New Phytol 79:511517 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, JH, Hopmans, WJ (2002) Pressure plate extractor. Pages 688690 in Dane, JH, Topp, GC, eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4. Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America (SSSA) Book Ser. 5. Madison, WI: SSSA Google Scholar
Davis, AS (2006) When does it make sense to target the weed seed bank? Weed Sci 54:558565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, AS, Liebman, M (2003) Cropping system effects on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) demography: I Green manure and tillage timing. Weed Sci 51:919929 Google Scholar
Davis, AS, Williams, MM (2007) Variation in wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) fecundity in sweet corn has residual effects in snap bean Weed Sci 55:502507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Miguel, L, Sanchez, RA (1992) Phytochrome-induced germination, endosperm softening and embryo growth potential in Datura ferox seeds: sensitivity to low water potential and time to escape to FR reversal J Exp Bot 43:969974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Didon, UME, Kolseth, AK, Widmark, D, Persson, P (2014) Cover crop residues-effects on germination and early growth of annual weeds Weed Sci 62:294302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dieleman, JA, Mortensen, DA, Martin, AR (1999) Influence of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) density variation on weed management outcomes Weed Sci 47:8189 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, MC, Lynch, JM (1980) Soil anaerobiosis, microorganisms, and root function Annu Rev Phytopathol 18:3766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egley, GH (1983) Weed seed and seedling reductions by soil solarization with transparent polyethylene sheets Weed Sci 31:404409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch-Savage, WE, Leubner-Metzger, G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination New Phytol 171:501523 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forcella, F (2003) Debiting the seedbank: priorities and predictions Aspects of Applied Biology 69:151161 Google Scholar
Gallagher, RS, Cardina, J (1997) Soil water thresholds for photoinduction of redroot pigweed germination Weed Sci 45:414418 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilhorst, HWM, Darssen, CM (2000) Effect of chemical environment on seed germination. Pages 293309 in Fenner, M, ed. The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. New York: CABI CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Riley, MB, Bridges, W (2010) Annual changes in temperature and light requirements for germination of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seeds retrieved from soil Weed Sci 58:426432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, EN, Holm, FA (2010) Pre-emergence mechanical weed control in field pea (Pisum sativum L.) Can J Plant Sci 90:133138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, WC, Mullinix, BG (1995) Weed management in peanut using stale seedbed techniques Weed Sci 43:293297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N, Mortensen, DA, Prenzlow, DM, Cox, KC (1995) Simulation analysis of crop-rotation effects on weed seedbanks Am J Bot 82:390398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keddy, PA, Constabel, P (1986) Germination of 10 shoreline plants in relation to seed size, soil particle size and water level: an experimental study. J Ecol 74:133141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, RG, Owen, MDK (2004) Artificial and natural seed banks differ in seedling emergence patterns Weed Sci 52:531537 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsbary, SK, O'Sullivan, J, Swanton, CJ (2003) Stale-seedbed as a weed management alternative for machine-harvested cucumbers (Cucumis sativus). Weed Technol 17:724730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovley, DR (1991) Dissimilatory Fe(III) and Mn(IV) reduction Microbiol Rev 55:259287 Google ScholarPubMed
Lovley, DR, Phillips, EJP (1987) Rapid assay for microbially reducible ferric iron in aquatic sediments Appl Environ Microbiol 53:15361540 Google ScholarPubMed
Mayer, DG, Butler, DG (1993) Statistical validation Ecol Model 68:2132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melander, B, Rasmussen, G (2001) Effects of cultural methods and physical weed control on intrarow weed numbers, manual weeding and marketable yield in direct-sown leek and bulb onion Weed Res 41:491508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menalled, FD, Liebman, M, Renner, KA (2006) The ecology of weed seed predation in herbaceous crop fields. Pages 297327 in Singh, HP, Batish, DR Kohli, KK, eds. Handbook of Sustainable Weed Management. New York: Food Products Press Google Scholar
Milberg, P, Andersson, L (1997) Seasonal variation in dormancy and light sensitivity in buried seeds of eight annual weed species Can J Bot 75:19982004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsky, SB, Gallandt, ER, Mortensen, DA, Curran, WS, Shumway, DL (2010) Reducing the germinable weed seedbank with soil disturbance and cover crops Weed Res 50:341352 Google Scholar
Morinaga, T (1926) Germination of seeds under water Am J Bot 13:126140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D, Stoltenberg, DE (1997) Increased weed emergence and seed bank depletion by soil disturbance in a no-tillage system Weed Sci 45:234241 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, MW, Curran, WS, Vangessel, MJ, Majek, BA, Mortensen, DA, Calvin, DD, Karsten, HD, Roth, GW (2005) Effect of soil disturbance on annual weed emergence in the northeastern United States Weed Technol 19:274282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modelling evolution and management of glyphosate resistance in Amaranthus palmeri Weed Res 51:99112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations Weed Sci 60:3162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J (2000) Tetrazolium Testing Handbook. Lincoln, NE: Association of Official Seed Analysts Google Scholar
Pons, TL (2000) Seed responses to light. Pages 237260 in Fenner, M, ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. New York: CABI CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, HA, Potter, ME (1980) Emergence patterns of weed seedlings in relation to cultivation and rainfall Weed Res 20:377386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarlistyaningsih, L, Sivasithamparam, K, Setter, TL (1995) Influence of waterlogging on germination and survival of lupin seeds (Lupinus angustifolius L cv Gungurru) coated with calcium peroxide and streptomycin Aust J Exp Agr 35:537541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schafer, M, Kotanen, PM (2003) The influence of soil moisture on losses of buried seeds to fungi Acta Oecologica 24:255263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Cunningham, A (2015) Tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpurea) seedbank density effects on pendimethalin control outcomes Weed Technol 29:844853 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Davis, AS, Peinado, SA, Ashigh, J (2014b) Seed-coat thickness data clarify seed size-seed-bank persistence trade-offs in Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae) Seed Sci Res 24:119131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Davis, AS, Renner, KA, Cardina, J. 2008. Maternal and burial environment effects on seed mortality of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). Weed Sci 56:834840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, BJ, Tomasek, BJ, Davis, AS, Andersson, L, Benoit, DL, Cirujeda, A, Dekker, J, Forcella, F, Gonzalez-Andujar, JL, Graziani, F, Murdoch, AJ, Neve, P, Rasmussen, IA, Sera, B, Salonen, J, Tei, F, Torresen, KS, Urbano, JM (2014a) An investigation to enhance understanding of the stimulation of weed seedling emergence by soil disturbance Weed Res 54:112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopel, AL, Ballare, CL, Sanchez, RA (1991) Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weed seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivations Plant Cell Environ 14:501508 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spandl, E, Durgan, BR, Forcella, F (1998) Tillage and planting date influence foxtail (Setaria spp.) emergence in continuous spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 12:223229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparks, OC, Barrentine, JL, Burgos, NR, McClelland, MR (2004) Effect of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seedbank density on the performance of pendimethalin and fluometuron. Pages 167172 in Oosterhuis, DM, ed. Summaries of Arkansas Cotton Research 2003. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Google Scholar
Steel, MG, Cavers, PB, Lee, SM (1983) The biology of Canadian weeds. 59. Setaria glauca (L) Beauv and Setaria verticillata (L) Beauv. Can J Plant Sci 63:711725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, IN, Walker, SR, Adkins, SW (2005) Burial depth and cultivation influence emergence and persistence of Phalaris paradoxa seed in an Australian sub-tropical environment Weed Res 45:3340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, KL, Hartzler, RG (2000) Effect of seed bank augmentation on herbicide efficacy Weed Technol 14:261267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K (2000) The functional ecology of soil seed banks. Pages 215236 in Fenner, M, ed. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. New York: CABI CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdu, AMC, Mas, MT (2004) Comparison of Polygonum aviculare L seedling survival under different tillage systems in Mediterranean dryland agroecosystems. Acta Oecol 25:119127 Google Scholar
Vertucci, CW, Vertucci, FA, Leopold, AC (1987) Water content and the conversion of phytochrome regulation of lettuce dormancy Plant Physiol 84:887890 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, M, Mitschunas, N (2008) Fungal effects on seed bank persistence and potential applications in weed biocontrol: A review Basic Appl Ecol 9:191203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, M, Newman, P (2007) Burning narrow windrows for weed seed destruction Field Crop Res 104:2430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, M, Newman, P, Powles, S (2013) Targeting weed seeds incrop: a new weed control paradigm for global agriculture Weed Technol 27:431436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) : A Review Weed Technol 27:1227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J (1999) Biostatistical Analysis. 4th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Google Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 63 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th January 2017 - 18th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-77fc7d77f9-g622z Total loading time: 0.283 Render date: 2021-01-18T21:23:05.621Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags last update: Mon Jan 18 2021 21:02:48 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) Feature Flags: { "metrics": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "peerReview": true, "crossMark": true, "comments": true, "relatedCommentaries": true, "subject": true, "clr": true, "languageSwitch": true, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Influence of Irrigation Timing on Disturbance-Induced Reductions in Soil Seedbank Density
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Influence of Irrigation Timing on Disturbance-Induced Reductions in Soil Seedbank Density
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Influence of Irrigation Timing on Disturbance-Induced Reductions in Soil Seedbank Density
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *