Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-10T02:33:44.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of emergence time on growth and fecundity of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridis): emerging problem weeds in Australian summer crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2021

Asad M. Khan*
Affiliation:
PhD Student, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
Ahmadreza Mobli
Affiliation:
Former PhD Student, Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran; Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
Jeff A. Werth
Affiliation:
Senior Research Scientist, Leslie Research Centre, Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, Australia
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
Professor, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI) and School of Agriculture and Food Sciences (SAFS), University of Queensland, Gatton, Queensland, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Asad M. Khan, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD4343, Australia. (Email: asad.khan@uq.net.au)

Abstract

Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and slender amaranth (Amaranthus viridis L.) are considered emerging problematic weeds in summer crops in Australia. An outdoor pot experiment was conducted to examine the effects of planting time on two populations of A. retroflexus and A. viridis at the research farm of the University of Queensland, Australia. Both species were planted every month from October to January (2017 to 2018 and 2018 to 2019), and their growth and seed production were recorded. Although both weeds matured at a similar number of growing degree days (GDD), they required a different number of days to complete their life cycles depending on planting date. The growth period was reduced and flowering occurred sooner as both species experienced cooler temperatures and shorter daylight hours. Both species exhibited increased height, biomass, and seed production for the October-sown plants compared with other planting times, and these parameters were reduced by delaying the planting time. The shoot and root biomass of A. retroflexus and A. viridis (averaged over both populations) was reduced by more than 70% and 65%, respectively, when planted in January, in comparison to planting in October. When planted in October, A. retroflexus and A. viridis produced 11,350 and 5,780 seeds plant−1, but these were reduced to 770 and 365 seeds plant−1 for the January planting date, respectively. Although the growth and fecundity of these species were dependent on planting time, these weeds could emerge throughout the late spring to summer growing season (October to March) in southeast Australia and could produce a significant number of seeds. The results showed that when these species emerged in the late spring (October), they grew vigorously and produced more biomass in comparison with the other planting dates. Therefore, any early weed management practice for these species could be beneficial for minimizing the subsequent cost and energy inputs toward their control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Ramon G. Leon, North Carolina State University

References

Bajwa, AA, Chauhan, BS, Adkins, SW (2018) Germination ecology of two Australian biotypes of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) relates to their invasiveness. Weed Sci 66:6270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbasso, MF, Orzari, I, Silva, BVIR, Braga, IMRF, Alves, PLDCA (2018) Intra-and inter-specific interference between slender amaranth and red pepper. Afr J Agric Res 13:24602470 Google Scholar
Bensch, CN, Horak, MJ, Peterson, D (2003) Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci 51:3743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosnic, AC, Swanton, CJ (1997) Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 45:276282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, SJPD, Christoffoleti, PJ (2008) Competition of Amaranthus species with dry bean plants. Sci Agric 65:239245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costea, M, Weaver, SE, Tardif, FJ (2004) The biology of Canadian weeds. 130. Amaranthus retroflexus L., A. powellii S. Watson and A. hybridus L. Can J Plant Sci 84:631668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deen, W, Hunt, T, Swanton, CJ (1998) Influence of temperature, photoperiod, and irradiance on the phenological development of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Weed Sci 46:555560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estorninos, LE, Gealy, DR, Gbur, EE, Talbert, RE, McClelland, MR (2005) Rice and red rice interference. II. Rice response to population densities of three red rice (Oryza sativa) ecotypes. Weed Sci 53:683689 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, JA., Bradley, KW, Young, BG, Steckel, LE, Johnson, WG, Norsworthy, JK, Davis, VM, Loux, MM (2017) Influence of tillage method on management of Amaranthus species in soybean. Weed Technol 31:1020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghersa, CM, Holt, JS (1995) Using phenology prediction in weed management: a review. Weed Res 35:461470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, RF (1989) Simulation of maize phenology. J Agron 81:451457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, JL, Boote, KJ, Kimball, BA, Ziska, LH, Izaurralde, RC, Ort, D, Thomson, AM, Wolfe, D (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. J Agron 103:351370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatfield, JL, Prueger, JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extremes 10:410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2020) International Survey of Herbicide-Resistant Weeds. http://weedscience.org. Accessed: March 11, 2020Google Scholar
Hegazy, AK, Fahmy, GM, Ali, MI, Gomaa, NH (2005) Growth and phenology of eight common weed species. J Arid Environ 61:171183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heneghan, JM, Johnson, WG (2017) The growth and development of five waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) populations in a common garden. Weed Sci 65:247255 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, T (1991). Temperature and water stress effects on phenology. Pages 713 in Hodges, T, ed. Predicting Crop Phenology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Google Scholar
Holm, L, Doll, J, Holm, E, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1997) World Weeds: Natural Histories and Distribution. New York: Wiley. Pp 5165 Google Scholar
Huang, JZ, Shrestha, A, Tollenaar, M, Deen, W, Rahimian, H, Swanton, CJ (2000) Effects of photoperiod on the phenological development of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.). Can J Plant Sci 80:929938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, JZ, Shrestha, A, Tollenaar, M, Deen, W, Rajcan, I, Rahimian, H, Swanton, CJ (2001) Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the phenological development of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.). Field Crops Res 70:7586 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, S, Khaliq, A, Matloob, A, Fahad, S, Tanveer, A (2015). Interference and economic threshold level of little seed canary grass in wheat under different sowing times. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:441449 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, J, Kokko, H (2002) Cohort effects and population dynamics. Ecol Lett 5:338344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manalil, S, Werth, J, Jackson, R, Chauhan, BS, Preston, C (2017) An assessment of weed flora 14 years after the introduction of glyphosate-tolerant cotton in Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 68:773780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, SM, Murphy, SD, Tollenaar, M, Weise, SF, Swanton, CJ (1995) Light limitation of reproduction and variation in the allometric relationship between reproductive and vegetative biomass in Amaranthus retroflexus (redroot pigweed). J Appl Ecol 32:157165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobli, A, Manalil, S, Khan, AM, Jha, P, Chauhan, BS (2020) Effect of emergence time on growth and fecundity of Rapistrum rugosum and Brassica tournefortii in the northern region of Australia. Sci Rep 10:15979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobli, A, Matloob, A, Chauhan, BS (2019a) The response of glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible biotypes of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) to mungbean density. Weed Sci 67:642648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mobli, A, Mijani, S, Ghanbari, A, Rastgoo, M (2019b) Seed germination and emergence of two flax-leaf alyssum (Alyssum linifolium Steph. ex. Willd.) populations in response to environmental factors. Crop Pasture Sci 70:807813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Korres, NE, Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2016) Integrating herbicide programs with harvest weed seed control and other fall management practices for the control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 64:540550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osten, VA, Walker, SR, Storrie, A, Widderick, M, Moylan, P, Robinson, GR, Galea, K (2007) Survey of weed flora and management relative to cropping practices in the north-eastern grain region of Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 47:5770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, DT (1992) Temperature and canopy development of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 6:6876 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajagopalan, AV, Devi, MT, Raghavendra, AS (1993) Patterns of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase activity and cytosolic pH during light activation and dark deactivation in C3 and C4 plants. Photosynth Res 38:5160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, LM, Norsworthy, JK, Young, BG, Bradley, KW, Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Steckel, LE, Walsh, MJ (2016) Tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seed production and retention at soybean maturity. Weed Technol 30:284290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, BA, Smeda, RJ, Johnson, WG, Kendig, JA, Ellersieck, MR (2003) Comparative growth of six Amaranthus species in Missouri. Weed Sci 51:329333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spaunhorst, DJ, Devkota, P, Johnson, WG, Smeda, RJ, Meyer, CJ, Norsworthy, JK (2018) Phenology of five Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) populations grown in northern Indiana and Arkansas. Weed Sci 66:457469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uva, RH, Neal, JC, DiTomaso, JM, eds (1997) Weeds of the Northeast. 1st ed. New York: Cornell University Press. 397 pGoogle Scholar
Walker, SR, Taylor, IN, Milne, G, Osten, VA, Hoque, Z, Farquharson, RJ (2005) A survey of management and economic impact of weeds in dryland cotton cropping systems of subtropical Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 45:7991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27:1227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waselkov, KE, Olsen, KM (2014) Population genetics and origin of the native North American agricultural weed waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus). Am J Bot 101:17261736 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willenborg, CJ, May, WE, Gulden, RH, Lafond, G, Shirtliffe, SJ (2005) Influence of wild oat (Avena fatua) relative time of emergence and density on cultivated oat yield, wild oat seed production, and wild oat contamination. Weed Sci 53:342352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, C, Owen, MD (2014) When is the best time to emerge: reproductive phenology and success of natural common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) cohorts in the Midwest United States? Weed Sci 62:107117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar