Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:10:39.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visual thresholds in albino and pigmented rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2009

Pilar Herreros De Tejada ,
Daniel G. Green  and
Carmen Muñoz Tedó
Pilar Herreros De Tejada
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
Daniel G. Green
Affiliation:
Vision Research Laboratory, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Carmen Muñoz Tedó
Affiliation:
Departamento de Psicobiologia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Albino rats have recently been reported to have increment thresholds against dim backgrounds that are two log units higher than those of pigmented rats. We, on the other hand, have failed to confirm these differences using electroretinogram b waves and pupillary light reflexes. This paper reports on experiments using evoked potentials from cortex and colliculus and single-unit recordings from colliculus.

We recorded visual-evoked potentials from cortex and superior colliculus in the strains of albino (CD) and pigmented (Long-Evans) rats used in the earlier studies. Thresholds were determined on eight fully dark-adapted animals by extrapolating intensity-response curves to the point at which there was zero evoked potential. The average dark-adapted threshold for the visual-evoked cortical potential was —5.26 log cd/m2in pigmented and —5.80 log cd/m2 in albino animals. The average dark-adapted threshold for the superior colliculus evoked response was —5.54 log cd/m2 in pigmented and —5.84 log cd/m2 in albinos. The differences were not statistically significant. On the same apparatus, the average absolute threshold for three human observers was —5.3 log cd/m2, a value close to the rat dark-adapted thresholds. Thus, visual-evoked cortical potentials and superior collicular evoked potentials failed to confirm the report of higher dark-adapted thresholds for albinos. In addition, we find that single units in superior colliculus in the albino rat respond to very dim flashes.

Keywords

AlbinoPigmentedRatEvoked potentialAbsolute threshold
Type
Research Articles
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 9 , Issue 3-4 , October 1992 , pp. 409 - 414
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balkema, G.W. (1988). Elevated dark-adapted thresholds in albino rodents. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 29, 544–554.Google ScholarPubMed
Balkema, G.W. & Drager, U.C. (1987). Elevated dark-adapted thresholds in hypopigmented animals. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 28, 407.Google Scholar
Balkema, G.W. & Drager, U.C. (1991). Impaired visual thresholds in hypopigmented animals. Visual Neuroscience 6, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berkley, M.A. & Watkins, D.W. (1971). Visual acuity of the cat estimated from evoked cerebral potential. Nature, New Biology 234, 91–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonaventure, N., Wioland, N. & Karli, P. (1985). Enhance sensory convergence to the visual cortex in the rodless (rd/rd) mouse. Documenta Ophthalmologica 61, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F.W. & Kulikowski, J.J. (1972). The visual evoked potential as a function of contrast sensitivity of a grating pattern. Journal of Physiology 222, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, F.W., Maffei, L. & Piccolino, M. (1973). The contrast sensitivity of the cat. Journal of Physiology 229, 719–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cicerone, C.M. & Green, D.G. (1990). Light adaptation within the receptive field centre of rat retinal ganglion cells. Journal of Physiology 301, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creel, D.J., Conlee, J.W. & King, R.A. (1990). Dark adaptation in human albinos. Clinical Visual Science 5(1), 81–85.Google Scholar
Creel, D.J., Dustman, R.E. & Beck, E.C. (1970). Differences in visually evoked responses in albino versus hooded rats. Experimental Neurology 29, 298–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodt, E. & Echte, K. (1961). Dark and light adaptation in pigmented and white rat as measured by electroretinogram threshold. Journal of Neurophysiology 24, 427–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dyer, R.S. & Swartzwelder, H.S. (1978). Sex and strain differences in the visual evoked potentials of albino and hooded rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior 9, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, L.J. & Green, D.G. (1982). Ganglion cell acuity in hooded rats. Vision Research 22, 441–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D.G., Herreros De Tejada, P. & Glover, M.J. (1991). Are albino rats night blind? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 32, 2366–2371.Google ScholarPubMed
Green, D.G. & Powers, M.K. (1982). Mechanisms of light adaptation in rat retina. Vision Research 22, 209–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D.G., Tong, L. & Cicerone, C.M. (1977). Lateral spread of light adaptation in the rat retina. Vision Research 17, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harnois, C., Bodis-Wollner, I. & Onofrj, M. (1984). The effect of contrast and spatial frequency on the visual evoked potential of the hooded rat. Experimental Brain Research 57, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lennie, P. & Perry, V.H. (1981). Spatial contrast sensitivity of cells in lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat. Journal of Physiology 315, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levick, W.R. (1972). Another tungsten microelectrode. Medical and Biological Engineering 10, 510–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz Tedó, C. & Herreros De Tejada, P. (1991). Sex differences in the contrast sensitivity function of the rat. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 32, 1111.Google Scholar
Muñoz Tedó, C., Herreros De Tejada, P. & Green, D.G. (1992). Behavioral dark-adapted threshold in the rat. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (Suppl.) 33, 1261.Google Scholar
Muñoz Tedó, C., Herreros De Tejada, P. & Rodriguez, A. (1991). Estudios fisiológicos y conductuales de la detección de frecuencias espaciales en roedores. Investigaciones Psicologicas 10 (in press).Google Scholar
Onofrj, M., Bodis-Wollner, I. & Bobak, P. (1982). Pattern visual evoked potentials in the rat. Physiology and Behavior 28, 227–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purpura, K., Kaplan, E. & Shapley, R.M. (1988). Background light and the contrast gain of primate P and M retinal ganglion cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 85, 4534–4537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratto, G.M., Robinson, D.W., Yan, Y. & McNaughton, P.A. (1991). Development of the light response in neonatal mammalian rods. Nature 351, 654–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silveira, L.C., Heywood, C.A. & Cowey, A. (1987). Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity of the pigmented rat determined electrophysiologically. Vision Research 27, 1719–1731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokol, S. (1970). Cortical and retinal spectral sensitivity of the hooded rat. Vision Research 10, 253–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weidner, C. (1981). The presence of an albino ERG in the pigmented rat: genetic implications. Journal of Physiology (Paris) 77, 813–821.Google Scholar