Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Depth from shading and disparity in humans and monkeys

  • YING ZHANG (a1), VERONICA S. WEINER (a1), WARREN M. SLOCUM (a1) and PETER H. SCHILLER (a1)

Abstract

A stimulus display was devised that enabled us to examine how effectively monkeys and humans can process shading and disparity cues for depth perception. The display allowed us to present these cues separately, in concert and in conflict with each other. An oddities discrimination task was used. Humans as well as monkeys were able to utilize both shading and disparity cues but shading cues were more effectively processed by humans. Humans and monkeys performed better and faster when the two cues were presented conjointly rather than singly. Performance was significantly degraded when the two cues were presented in conflict with each other suggesting that these cues are processed interactively at higher levels in the visual system. The fact that monkeys can effectively utilize depth information derived from shading and disparity indicates that they are a good animal model for the study of the neural mechanisms that underlie the processing of these two depth cues.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Peter H. Schiller, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail: phschill@mit.edu

References

Hide All

REFERENCES

Braunstein, M.L. & Stern, K.R. (1980). Static and dynamic factors in the perception of rotary motion. Perception & Psychophysics 27, 313320.
Bruno, N. & Cutting, J.E. (1988). Minimodularity and the perception of layout. Journal of Experimental Psychology 117, 161170.
Cao, A. & Schiller, P.H. (2002). Behavioral assessment of motion parallax and stereopsis as depth cues in rhesus monkeys. Vision Research 42, 19531961.
Cao, A. & Schiller, P.H. (2003). Neural responses to relative speed in the primary visual cortex of rhesus monkey. Visual Neuroscience 20, 7784.
Capilla, P., Malo, J., Luque, M.J. & Artigas, J.M. (1998). Colour representation spaces at different physiological levels: A comparative analysis. Journal of Optics 29, 324338.
Cumming, B.G. & DeAngelis, G.C. (2001). The physiology of stereopsis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24, 203238.
Freeman, R.D. (1999). Stereoscopic vision: Which parts of the brain are involved? Current Biology 9, R610613.
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised 1985.
Hanazawa, A. & Komatsu, H. (2001). Influence of the direction of elemental luminance gradients on the responses of V4 cells to textured surfaces. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 44904497.
Howard, I.P. (2002). Seeing in Depth: Basic Mechanisms. Toronto: I. Porteous.
Howard, I.P. & Rogers, B.J. (2002). Seeing in depth, Volume 2: Depth Perception. Toronto: I. Porteous.
Laby, D.M., Rosenbaum, A.L., Kirschen, D.G., Davidson, J.L., Rosenbaum, L.J., Strasser, C. & Mellman, M.F. (1996). The visual function of professional baseball players. American Journal of Ophthalmology 122, 476485.
Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S. & Silverman, G.H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping, and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception 18, 5568.
Parker, A.J. & Cumming, B.G. (2001). Cortical mechanisms of binocular stereoscopic vision. Progress in Brain Research 134, 205216.
Pasupathy, A. & Connor, C.E. (1999). Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. Journal of Neurophysiology 82, 24902502.
Pasupathy, A. & Connor, C.E. (2001). Shape representation in area V4: Position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. Journal of Neurophysiology 86, 25052519.
Pasupathy, A. & Connor, C.E. (2002). Population coding of shape in area V4. Nature Neuroscience 5, 13321338.
Poggio, G.F. & Poggio, T. (1984). The analysis of stereopsis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 7, 379412.
Ramachandran, V.S. (1988). Perceiving shape from shading. Scientific American 259, 7683.
Rogers, B.J. & Collett, T.S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 41, 697717.
Schiller, P.H. (1993). The effects of V4 and middle temporal (MT) area lesions on visual performance in the rhesus monkey. Visual Neuroscience 10, 717746.
Sekuler, R. & Blake, R. (1994). Perception. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Stevens, K.A. & Brookes, A. (1988). Integrating stereopsis with monocular interpretations of planar surfaces. Vision Research 28, 371386.
Weber, H., Aiple, F., Fischer, B. & Latanov, A. (1992). Dead zone for express saccades. Experimental Brain Research 89, 214222.
Weiner, V.S., Schiller, P.H. & Zhang, Y. (2006). How effective are disparity and motion parallax cues for depth perception in monkeys and humans? Journal of Vision 6, 343a.
Zhang, Y., Schiller, P.H., Weiner, V.S. & Slocum, W.M. (2005). Depth from shading and disparity in humans and monkeys. Journal of Vision 5, 407a.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Depth from shading and disparity in humans and monkeys

  • YING ZHANG (a1), VERONICA S. WEINER (a1), WARREN M. SLOCUM (a1) and PETER H. SCHILLER (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.