Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:20:33.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Activation of Group III mGluRs increases the activity of neurons in area 17 of the cat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2002

C.J. BEAVER
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven
Q-H. JI
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven
X-T. JIN
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven
N.W. DAW
Affiliation:
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven

Abstract

Activation of Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) by L(+)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (L-AP4) has different effects on in vitro slice preparations of visual cortex (Jin & Daw, 1998) as compared with in vivo recordings from somatosensory cortex (Wan & Cahusac, 1995). To investigate the role of Group III mGluRs in the cat visual cortex, in vivo recordings were made of neurons in area 17 of the visual cortex of kittens and adult cats at different ages and the effect of iontophoretic application of L-AP4 (100 mM) was examined. Application of L-AP4 resulted in an increase of the spontaneous activity and visual response of neurons to visual stimulation, the former more than the latter. The effect of L-AP4 was greatest at 3–5 weeks of age with the effect on the visual response declining more rapidly than the effect on spontaneous activity. Consistent with work in rat cortex (Jin & Daw, 1998), the effect of L-AP4 was significantly greater in upper and lower layers than in middle layers. Whole-cell in vitro recordings from slices of rat visual cortex indicated that L-AP4 (50 mM) did not increase the number of spikes elicited by increasing levels of current injections. These results confirm that L-AP4 increases activity in vivo and reasons for the discrepancy with the in vitro results are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)