Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T19:02:26.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A single mechanism for both luminance and chromatic grating vernier tasks: Evidence from temporal summation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2005

HAO SUN  and
BARRY B. LEE
HAO SUN
Affiliation:
SUNY State College of Optometry, New York
BARRY B. LEE
Affiliation:
SUNY State College of Optometry, New York Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, D37077 Göttingen, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Vernier thresholds are determined by luminance rather than chromatic contrast when both are present in vernier targets. The role of luminance and chromatic mechanisms in vernier performance under equiluminant conditions remains uncertain. Temporal summation functions for vernier thresholds with luminance and red–green equiluminant gratings were compared to those for detection thresholds with similar stimuli. Vernier thresholds showed similar temporal summation for luminance and chromatic gratings, which is consistent with a single mechanism underlying vernier performance in the two conditions. However, detection thresholds showed a shorter temporal summation duration for luminance gratings than for chromatic gratings, which suggests that two different mechanisms underlie detection thresholds. Analysis of physiological data supports the hypothesis that the frequency-doubled response of ganglion cells in the magnocellular pathway can provide accurate spatiotemporal information for vernier performance at equiluminance.

Keywords

VernierTemporal summationLuminanceChromatic
Type
Research Article
Information
Visual Neuroscience , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 2004 , pp. 315 - 320
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anstis, S. & Cavanagh, P. (1983). A Minimum Motion Technique for Judging Equiluminance. London: Academic Press.
Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular Statistics in Biology. London: Academic Press.
Bowen, R.W., Lindsey, D.T., & Smith, V.C. (1977). Chromatic two-pulse resolution with and without luminance transients. Journal of the Optical Society of America 67, 1501–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lange, H. (1958). Research into the dynamic nature of the human fovea-cortex systems with intermittent and modulated light. Journal of the Optical Society of America 48, 779–789.Google Scholar
Kaiser, P.K., Herzberg, P.A., & Boynton, R.M. (1971). Chromatic border distinctness and its relation to saturation. Vision Research 11, 953–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, P.K., Lee, B.B., Martin, P.R., & Valberg, A. (1990). The physiological basis of the minimally distinct border demonstrated in the ganglion cells of the macaque retina. Journal of Physiology 422, 153–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, D.H. & Norren, D.V. (1977). Two-band model of heterochromatic flicker. Journal of the Optical Society of America 67, 1081–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauskopf, J. & Farell, B. (1991). Vernier acuity: Effects of chromatic content, blur and contrast. Vision Research 31, 735–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.B., Martin, P.R., & Valberg, A. (1988). The physiological basis of heterochromatic flicker photometry demonstrated in the ganglion cells of the macaque retina. Journal of Physiology 404, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B.B., Martin, P.R., & Valberg, A. (1989a). Nonlinear summation of M- and L-cone inputs to phasic retinal ganglion cells of the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience 9, 1433–1442.Google Scholar
Lee, B.B., Martin, P.R., & Valberg, A. (1989b). Sensitivity of macaque retinal ganglion cells to chromatic and luminance flicker. Journal of Physiology 414, 223–243.Google Scholar
Legge, G.E. (1978). Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial properties. Vision Research 18, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, M.J. & Aiba, T.S. (1985a). Positional acuity with chromatic stimuli. Vision Research 25, 689–695.Google Scholar
Morgan, M.J. & Aiba, T.S. (1985b). Vernier acuity predicted from changes in the light distribution of the retinal image. Spatial Vision 1, 151–161.Google Scholar
Mullen, K.T., Yoshizawa, T., & Baker, C.L., Jr. (2003). Luminance mechanisms mediate the motion of red–green isoluminant gratings: The role of “temporal chromatic aberration”. Vision Research 43, 1235–1247.Google Scholar
Regan, D. & Tyler, C.W. (1971). Temporal summation and its limit for wavelength changes: An analog of Bloch's Law for color vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America 61, 1414–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüttiger, L., Lee, B.B., & Sun, H. (2002). Transient cells can be neurometrically sustained; the positional accuracy of retinal signals to moving targets. Journal of Vision 2, 232–242.Google Scholar
Rüttiger, L.R. & Lee, B.B. (1998). Vernier signals derived from primate ganglion cells: Effects of motion speed and contrast. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement 39, S564.Google Scholar
Smith, V.C., Bowen, R.W., & Pokorny, J. (1984). Threshold temporal integration of chromatic stimuli. Vision Research 24, 653–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, V.C., Lee, B.B., Pokorny, J., Martin, P.R., & Valberg, A. (1992). Responses of macaque ganglion cells to the relative phase of heterochromatically modulated lights. Journal of Physiology 458, 191–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, H. & Lee, B.B. (2003). Polarity reversals as a tool for isolating luminance and chromatic contributions to a Vernier task. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 44, E-abstract 3191. Available at http://abstracts.ioux.org/cgi/content/abstract/44/5/ 3191.Google Scholar
Sun, H., Lee, B.B., & Rüttiger, L. (2003). Coding of position of achromatic and chromatic edges by retinal ganglion cells. In Normal and Defective Colour Vision, ed. Mollon, J.D., Pokorny, J. & Knoblauch, K., pp. 79–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Swanson, W.H., Ueno, T., Smith, V.C., & Pokorny, J. (1987). Temporal modulation sensitivity and pulse detection thresholds for chromatic and luminance perturbations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 4, 1992–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansley, B.W. & Boynton, R.M. (1978). Chromatic border perception: The role of red- and green-sensitive cones. Vision Research 18, 683–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valberg, A. & Tansley, B.W. (1977). Tritanoptic purity-difference function to describe the properties of minimally distinct borders. Journal of the Optical Society of America 67, 1330–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valberg, A., Lee, B.B., Kaiser, P.K., & Kremers, J. (1992). Responses of macaque ganglion cells to movement of chromatic borders. Journal of Physiology 458, 579–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, A.B. (1986). Temporal sensitivity. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. I, ed. Boff, K.R., Kaufman, L. & Thomas, J.P., pp. 6-1–6-43. New York: Wiley.
Waugh, S.J. & Levi, D.M. (1993). Visibility, timing and vernier acuity. Vision Research 33, 505–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.