Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:17:16.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Finger-Sucking and Nail-Biting in Japanese Twin Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Syuichi Ooki*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Science, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, Kahoku, Ishikawa, Japan. sooki@kj8.so-net.ne.jp
*
*Address for correspondence: Syuichi Ooki, Department of Health Science, Ishikawa Prefectural Nursing University, Tsu7-1 Nakanuma, Kahoku, Ishikawa, 929-1212, Japan.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purpose of this study was to clarify the genetic contribution to finger-sucking and nail- biting in childhood using the largest databases available on Japanese twins. The subjects were 1131 pairs of 12-year-old twin children, consisting of 1057 males and 1205 females. All data were gathered by maternal questionnaire, and responses to the questionnaire were checked in the medical interview. The prevalence of finger-sucking between 0 to 2 years was 40% in males and 43% in females (p = .0053). The prevalence of nail-biting up until the age of 12 years was 28% in males and 26% in females (nonsignificant). Concordance rates and polychoric correlations were all higher in monozygotic pairs than in dizygotic pairs, irrespective of the sex combination. Univariate and bivariate genetic analyses using structural equation modeling was performed. The results showed that the proportion of total phenotypic variance attributable to genetic influences was 66% in males and 50% in females for finger-sucking, and 50% in both males and females for nail-biting. A co-occurrence of finger-sucking and nail-biting was observed in 17.7% of males (tetrachoric correlation: r = .40) and 15.7% of females (r = .32), which was attributed partly to common genetic or environmental factors. The proportion of total shared variance explained by genetic factors was 67%.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005