Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T15:39:33.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

47. Cosmology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The preparation of a report dealing with such a large domain is almost an impossible task. Because so many different questions, problems and expertises are assembled under the word “Cosmology”, my approach has been the following: first to divide this field in a somewhat arbitrary fashion into the following sections: very early universe – elementary particle and cosmology – early nucleosynthesiscosmological parameters (Hubble constant, deceleration parameter, cosmological constant) – large scale structures, intergalactic gas, missing mass – clusters of galaxies and intercluster gas – anisotropy of the black body radiation – formation of galaxies – quasars and their evolution – cosmological evolution of radiosources. I have then asked to the most knowledgeable specialists to review briefly each of these most important questions on which many excitinq and very new results have been obtained not only by the astrophysicists themselves but also by particle physicists, nuclear physicists, theoretical physicists, … This is why the reader will read in section 1 the report on primordial nucleosynthesis written by G. Steigman, in section 2 Anisotropy of the black body radiation by D.T. Wilkinson and E. Meichiorri, in section 3 Clusters of galaxies by 3. Einasto, in section 4 Galaxy formation by B.J.T. Jones, in section 5 Quasars and their evolution by M. Schmidt and in section 6 the Cosmological evolution of radio sources by R.A. Windhorst. Let me thank these colleagues for their excellent work in writing these various reviews.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1985

References

References

Barrow, J.D., M.N.R.A.S., 211 (In press) (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrow, J.D. and Morgan, J., MNRAS 203, 393 (1983)Google Scholar
Beaudet, G. and Reeves, H., In Proc. of ESO Workshop, p. 53 (1983)Google Scholar
Bruston, P., Audouze, J., Vidal-Madjar, A. and Laurent, C., Ap.J. 243, 161 (1981)Google Scholar
Cambier, J-L., Primack, J.R. and Sher, M., Nucl. Phys. B20, 372 (1983).Google Scholar
Dicus, D.A., Kolb, E.W., Gleeson, A.M., Sudarshan, E.C.G., Teplitz, V.L. and Turner, M.S., Phys. Rev. D26, 2694 (1982).Google Scholar
Encrenaz, T. and Combes, M., Icarus 52, 54 (1982).Google Scholar
Fry, J.N. and Hogan, C.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1873 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelss, J., Sp. Sci. Rev. 33, 201 (1982).Google Scholar
Gelss, J. and Reeves, H., Astron. Astrophys. 93, 189 (1981).Google Scholar
Harris, M.J., Fowler, W.A., Caughlan, G.R. and Zimmerman, B.A., Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 21, 165 (1983).Google Scholar
Johansson, A.E.I., Peressutti, G. and Skagerstam, B-S.K., Phys. Lett. B117, 171 (1982).Google Scholar
Kinman, T.D. and Davidson, K., Ap. J. (In press) (1984).Google Scholar
Kolb, E.W. and Scherrer, R.J., Phys. Rev. 025, 1481 (1982).Google Scholar
Kunde, V., Hanel, R., Maguire, W., Gautier, D., Baluteau, J.P., Marten, A.,Chedin, A., Husson, N. and Scott, N., Ap. J. 263, 443 (1982).Google Scholar
Kunth, D. and Sargent, W.L.W., Ap. J. 273, 81 (1983).Google Scholar
Laurent, C, In “Proc. of ESO Workshop” p. 335 (1983).Google Scholar
Matzner, R., In “Numerical Astrophysics” (eds., Centrella, J., LeBlanc, J. and Bowers, R., Jones, & Bartlett, , Boston, ) In Press (1982).Google Scholar
Olive, K.A., Schramm, D.N., Steigman, G., Turner, M.S. and Yang, J., Ap. J. 246, 557 (1981a).Google Scholar
Olive, K.A., Schramm, D.N. and Steigman, G., Nucl. Phys. B180, 497 (1981b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagel, B.E.J., Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A307, 19 (1982).Google Scholar
Rana, N., Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 209 (1982).Google Scholar
Rayo, J., Peimbert, M. and Torres-Peimbert, S., Ap. J. 255, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
Rood, R.T., Steigman, G. and Tinsley, B.M., Ap. J. (Lett.) 207, L57 (1976).Google Scholar
Rood, R.T., Bania, T.M. and Wilson, T.L., Ap. J. 280, 629 (1984).Google Scholar
Rosa, M., In “Proc. of the ESO Workshop”, p. 317 (1983).Google Scholar
Rothman, T. and Matzner, R., Phys. Rev. D30, 1649 (1984).Google Scholar
Scherrer, R.J., M.N.R.A.S. 205, 683 (1983).Google Scholar
Schramm, D.N. and Steigman, G., Phys. Lett. B141, 337 (1984).Google Scholar
Shaver, P.A., McGee, M.X., Newton, L.M., Danks, A.C. and Pottasch, S.R., M.N.R.A.S. 204, 53 (1983).Google Scholar
Smith, H.E., Ap. J., 199, 591 (1975).Google Scholar
Spite, F. and Spite, M., Astron. Astrophys. 115, 357 (1982a).Google Scholar
Spite, F. and Spite, M., Nature 297, 483 (1982b).Google Scholar
Spite, M., Maillard, J.P. and Spite, F., Astron. Astrophys., In Press (1984).Google Scholar
Steigman, G., In Proc. of Yerkes Conf., In Press (1983).Google Scholar
Steigman, G., “How Degenerate Can We Be” (In Preparation) (1984).Google Scholar
Steigman, G. and Boesgaard, A.M., Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 23, In Press(1984).Google Scholar
Tully, R.B., Boesgaard, A.M., Dyck, A.M. and Schempp, W.V., Ap. J. 246, 38 (1981).Google Scholar
Vidal-Madjar, A., Ferlet, R., Laurent, C. and York, D.G., Ap. J. 260, 128 (1982).Google Scholar
Vidal-Madjar, A., Laurent, C., Gry, C., Bruston, P., Ferlet, R. and York, D.G., Astron. Astrophys. 120, 58 (1983).Google Scholar
Yang, 3., Turner, M.S., Steigman, G., Schramm, D.N. and Olive, K.A., Ap. J. 281, 493 (1984).Google Scholar
Audouze, J.: 1984, in Primordial Helium, ed. by Shaver, P.A. et al, ESO p. 3.Google Scholar
Audouze, J., Lindley, D. and Silk, J.: 1985, Ap. 3. (in press).Google Scholar
Delbourgo-Salvador, P., Gry, C., Malinie, G. and Audouze, J.: 1985, Astron.Astrophys. (in press).Google Scholar
Schaeffer, R., Delbourgo-Salvador, P. and Audouze, J..: 1985, submitted to Nature.Google Scholar
Vidal-Madjar, A. and Gry, C.: 1984, Astron. Astrophys. 138, 285.Google Scholar