Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T18:17:35.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vertical refraction angle derived from the variance of the angle-of-arrival fluctuations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

F. K. Brunner
F. K. Brunner*
Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Kensington, 2033, Australia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A theory is developed for evaluating the vertical refraction angle from the variance of the angle-of-arrival fluctuations, assuming a horizontally homogeneous turbulent atmospheric surface layer. The vertical refraction angle is mainly a function of the vertical temperature gradient, and the variance of the angle-of-arrival is related to the temperature structure parameter CT2. However, surface layer similarity theory states that both the mean vertical temperature gradient and CT2 are functions of the same scaling temperature T* and a thermal stability parameter. This therefore provides an indirect method of determining the vertical refraction angle from a measurement of the variance of the angle-of-arrival and an estimate of the thermal stability parameter. Advantages of this method over other techniques of evaluating vertical refraction are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 89: Refractional Influences in Astrometry Andgeodesy , 1979 , pp. 227 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Barrel, H. and Sears, J.E.: 1939, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A-238, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Bouricius, G.M.B. and Clifford, S.F.: 1970, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 60, pp. 1484–1489.Google Scholar
Brunner, F.K.: 1978, in Richardus, P. (ed.) Proc. Int. Symp. EDM and Influence Atmos. Refraction , Wageningen, Publ. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, pp. 245–255.Google Scholar
Brunner, F.K. and Fraser, C.S.: 1977, Unisurv G27 (Univ. NSW, Sydney), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Busch, N.E.: 1973, in Haugen, D.A. (ed.), Workshop on Micrometeorology , Am. Met. Soc., Boston, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Businger, J.A.: 1973, in Haugen, D.A. (ed.), Workshop on Micrometeorology , Am. Met. Soc., Boston, pp. 67–100.Google Scholar
Coulman, C.E.: 1966, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, pp. 1232–1238.Google Scholar
de Wolf, D.A.: 1974, Proc. IEEE 62, pp. 1523–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, A.J.: 1976, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 7, pp. 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glissmann, T.: 1976, Zur Bestimmung des Refraktionswinkels über die Dispersion des Lichtes mittels positionsempfindlicher Photodioden , Wiss. Arb. Geod. Photogramm. Kartogr. Hannover, T. U., Band 62, Hannover.Google Scholar
Kukkamäki, T.J.: 1950, Geofisica pura et applicata 18, pp. 120–127.Google Scholar
Lawrence, R.A. and Strohbehn, J.W.: 1970, Proc. IEEE 58, pp. 1523–1545.Google Scholar
Lee, R.W.: 1969, Radio Science 4, pp. 1211–1223.Google Scholar
Lumley, J.L. and Panofsky, H.A.: 1964, The Structure of Atmospheric Turbulence , Interscience-Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Okamoto, M. and Webb, E.K.: 1970, Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 96, pp. 591–600.Google Scholar
Panofsky, H.A.: 1968, J. Geophys. Res. 73, pp. 6047–6049.Google Scholar
Prilepin, M.T.: 1974, Elimination of angular refraction by means of multiple wavelength methods, Proc. Int. Symp. Terrestrial EDM and Atmos. Effects on Angular Measurements , Stockholm, 1974, Vol. 5.Google Scholar
Priestley, C.H.B.: 1959, Turbulent Transfer in the Lower Atmosphere , Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Tatarskii, V.I.: 1971, The Effects of the Turbulent Atmosphere on Wave Propagation , (Translated from the Russian), NTIS, Springfield, Va.Google Scholar
Tengström, E.: 1978, in Richardus, P. (ed.), Proc. Int. Symp. EDM and Influence Atmos. Refraction , Wageningen, Publ. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar
Wesely, M.L.: 1976, J. Appl. Meteorol. 15, pp. 1177–1188.Google Scholar
Wesely, M.L. and Alcaraz, E.C.: 1973, J. Geophys. Res. 78, pp. 6224–6232.Google Scholar
Wesely, M.L. and Derzko, Z.I.: 1975, Applied Optics 14, pp. 847–853.Google Scholar
Williams, D.C.: 1978, in Richardus, P. (ed.), Proc. Int. Symp. EDM and Influence Atmos. Refraction , Wageningen, Publ. Netherlands Geodetic Commission, pp. 163–170.Google Scholar
Webb, E.K.: 1964, Applied Optics 3, pp. 1329–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, E.K.: 1965, Meteorol. Monographs 6(28), pp. 27–58.Google Scholar
Wyngaard, J.C.: 1973, in Haugen, D.A. (ed.), Workshop on Micrometeorology , Am. Met. Soc., Boston, pp. 101–149.Google Scholar
Wyngaard, J.C. and Clifford, S.J.: 1978, Momentum, Heat and Moisture Fluxes from Structure Parameters, J. Atmos. Sci. 35, (in press).Google Scholar
Wyngaard, J.C., Izumi, Y. and Collins, S.A. Jr.: 1971, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, pp. 1646–1650.Google Scholar