Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-s56hc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T02:59:06.613Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The shapes of simulated dark matter halos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Volker Springel
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, 85740 Garching bei München, Germany
Simon D. M. White
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Straße 1, 85740 Garching bei München, Germany
Lars Hernquist
Affiliation:
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Dark matter halos formed in CDM simulations are known to have triaxial shapes, with substantial distortions from spherical symmetry. However, conflicting claims have been made with respect to radial variations of halo shape, or trends with mass. We propose a new, more robust method to determine halo shapes based on the gravitational potential, thereby avoiding measurement uncertainties that may be the cause of these discrepancies. We find a strong preference towards prolate halo shapes, with mean minor-to-major axis-ratios close to ~ 0.5. Spherical halos are generally very rare, but there is a trend for smaller mass systems to be less elongated. We also compare dark halo shapes found in hydrodynamical simulations that include radiative cooling, star formation, and feedback processes, with those measured in equivalent collisionless simulations. Dissipation makes dark halos substantially rounder at small radii, to the extent that their shape distribution matches that of elliptical galaxies.

Type
Part 13: The Shapes and Extents of Dark Halos
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Bullock, J. S. 2002, in The Shapes of Galaxies and their Dark Matter Halos, ed. Natarajan, P. (Singapore: World Scientific), p. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubinski, J. 1994, ApJ, 431, 617.Google Scholar
Dubinski, J., Carlberg, R. 1991, ApJ, 378, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M., Davis, M., Efstathiou, G. 1988, ApJ, 327, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jing, Y. P., Suto, Y. 2002, ApJ, 574, 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., White, S. D. M. 1996, ApJ, 462, 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryden, B. S. 1992, ApJ, 396, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, P. D., Rix, H.-W., Jarvis, B. J., Freeman, K. C. 1994, ApJ, 436, 629.Google Scholar
Springel, V., Hernquist, L. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springel, V., Yoshida, N., White, S. D. M. 2001, New Astronomy, 6, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, P. A., et al. 1998, MNRAS, 296, 1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, M. S., Quinn, P. J., Salmon, J. K., Zurek, W. H. 1992, ApJ, 399, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar