Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T08:25:42.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems Concerning the Extragalactic Distance Scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

G. O. Abell
G. O. Abell*
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The use of the brightest members of galaxy clusters as distance indicators is questioned because of a possible correlation between the absolute magnitude of the brightest galaxy and the richness of the cluster. Comparison of the clusters' luminosity functions is considered to be more appropriate. The difference between the two approaches is substantial when a comparison is made between the Coma and Virgo clusters. The value of the Hubble parameter may well be less than 50 km s−1 Mpc−1.

Type
Research Article
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 44: External Galaxies and Quasi-Stellar Objects , 1972 , pp. 341 - 352
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1972 

References

Abell, G. O.: 1958, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 3, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, G. O.: 1961, Astron. J. 66, 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, G. O.: 1962, in McVittie, G. C., (ed.), Problems of Extragalactic Research, New York, Macmillan Co., p. 213.Google Scholar
Abell, G. O.: 1965, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 3, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abell, G. O. and Eastmond, S.: 1968, Astron. J. 73, S161.Google Scholar
Abell, G. O. and Eastmond, S.: 1970, Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 2, 179.Google Scholar
Abell, G. O. and Mihalas, D. M.: 1966, Astron. J. 71, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bautz, L. P. and Morgan, W. W.: 1970, Astrophys. J. Letters 162, L149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, R. L.: 1961, Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacific 73, 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, E.: 1958, Medd. Lunds Astron. Obs. Ser. II, No. 136.Google Scholar
Holmberg, E.: 1962, in McVittie, G. C., (ed.), Problems of Extragalactic Research, New York, Macmillan Co., p. 401.Google Scholar
Holmberg, E.: 1969, Ark. Astron. 5 (No. 20), 305.Google Scholar
Matthews, T. A., Morgan, W. W., and Schmidt, M.: 1964, Astrophys. J. 140, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, W. W. and Lesh, J. R.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, B. A.: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racine, R.: 1968, J. Roy. Astron. Soc. Can. 62, 367.Google Scholar
Rood, H. J.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 158, 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A. R.: 1968, Astrophys. J. Letters 152, L149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, E. L.: 1957, Astron. J. 62, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de: 1953, Astron. J. 58, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de: 1956, in Beer, A. (ed.), Vistas in Astronomy 2, Pergamon Press, London and New York, p. 1584.Google Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de: 1958, Astron. J. 63, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de: 1961, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 6, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaucouleurs, G. de: 1970, Astrophys. J. 159, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, F.: 1942, Phys. Rev. 61, 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, F.: 1957, Morphological Astronomy, Springer Verlag, Berlin p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar