Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xm8r8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T16:17:13.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Present Status of the Astronomical Ephemeris

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Sh. Aoki  and
A. M. Sinzi
Sh. Aoki
Affiliation:
Tokyo Astronomical Observatory Mitaka, Tokyo, 181 Japan
A. M. Sinzi
Affiliation:
Hydro graphic Department of Japan Tsukiji-5, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104 Japan

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The IAU (1976) System of Astronomical Constants and a new set of fundamental theories will expectedly be introduced into the international and national ephemerides for the volumes of 1984 onwards. In order to avoid any confusion in the future, it is necessary to manifest the character of the data published in the current volumes of the Astronomical Ephemeris = American Ephemeris, both abbreviated as A.E. With this end in view, computer programs for the calculations of the ephemerides of the Sun and inner planets based on the Newcomb's (1895, 1898) Tables have been prepared at Tokyo Astronomical Observatory (TAO) and Hydrographic Department of Japan (JHD) independently of each other using different computers and hence different types of FORTRAN. JHD has further prepared the programs for the Moon's ephemerides based on the Brown-Eckert theory and has reproduced the Eckert, Brouwer and Clemence's numerical integrations of the outer planets. Fundamental ephemerides thus calculated are compared with those data tabulated in the A.E. for the year of 1975, as an example, in the present paper.

Type
Part III: Ephemerides, Equinox and Occultations
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 81: Dynamics of the Solar System , 1979 , pp. 115 - 120
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1979 

References

Clemence, G.M.: 1943, “Astron. J.” 50, pp. 127–128.Google Scholar
Clemence, G.M.: 1954, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. XIII, Pt. V. Google Scholar
Duncombe, R.L.: 1969, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. XX, Pt. II.Google Scholar
Eckert, W.J., Brouwer, D. and Clemence, G.M.: 1951, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. XII.Google Scholar
Eckert, W.J., Walker, M.J. and Eckert, D.: 1966, “Astron. J.” 71, pp. 314–332.Google Scholar
Herget, P.: 1962, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. XVI, Pt. III.Google Scholar
Inoue, K.: 1977, “Rep. Hydrogr. Res.” No. 12, pp. 59–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinoshita, H., Nakai, H. and Aoki, Sh.: 1974, “Ann. Tokyo Astron. Obs.” 2nd Ser. Vol. XIV, No. 1.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1895, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. VI, Pts. I, II, III.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1898, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. VI, Pt. IV.Google Scholar
Ross, F.E.: 1917, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. IX, Pt. II.Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T.C.: 1976, private communication.Google Scholar
Wilkins, G.A.: 1954, “Improved Lunar Ephemeris” by Eckert, W.J., Jones, R. and Clark, H.K., U.S. Gov. Printing Off., Washington, D.C., pp. 420–422.Google Scholar
Woolard, E.W.: 1953, “Astron. Pap. Amer. Eph.” Vol. XV, Pt. I.Google Scholar