Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:55:30.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary observations at 10-cm wavelength using the NRL 84-foot radio telescope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

E. F. McClain  and
R. M. Sloanaker
E. F. McClain
Affiliation:
Radio Astronomy Branch, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
R. M. Sloanaker
Affiliation:
Radio Astronomy Branch, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, D.C., U.S.A.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The largest steerable radio telescope in the United States (Fig. 1) has recently been completed at the U.S. Naval Research Laboratory's Maryland Point Observatory in Charles County, Maryland. The new instrument, an 84-foot parabolic antenna, or “dish,” was designed by the D. S. Kennedy Co. of Cohasset, Massachusetts. Originally ordered in June 1955, the instrument has been three years in design, construction, and erection. Carried on a polar or equatorial mount, the 84-foot aluminum reflector can be aimed at any point in the sky and can track any celestial object from horizon to horizon. It is the largest antenna with this type of mounting in the world.

Type
Part I: Moon and Planets
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 9: Paris Symposium on Radio Astronomy , 1959 , pp. 61 - 68
Copyright
Copyright © Stanford University Press 1959 

References

1. Dicke, R. H. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 17, 268, 1946.Google Scholar
2. Drake, F. D., and Ewen, H. I. Proc. I.R.E. 46, 53, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Haddock, F.T., and McCullough, T. P. Private communication.Google Scholar
4. Mayer, C. H., McCullough, T. P., and Sloanaker, R. M. Unpublished.Google Scholar
5. Haddock, F. T., Mayer, C. H., and Sloanaker, R. M. Ap. J. 119, 456, 1954.Google Scholar
6. Haddock, F. T., Mayer, C. H., and Sloanaker, R. M. Nature , 174, 176, 1954.Google Scholar
7. Hagen, J. P., McClain, E. F., and Hepburn, N. Proc. I.R.E. 42, 1811, 1954.Google Scholar
8. Crawford, A. B., Friis, H. T., and Jakes, W. C. Jr. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 35, 1199, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Mayer, C. H., McCullough, T. P., and Sloanaker, R. M. Proc. I.R.E. 46, 260, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mayer, C. H., McCullough, T. P., and Sloanaker, R. M. Ap. J. 127, 11, 1958.Google Scholar
11. Menzel, D. H., Coblentz, W. W., and Lampland, C. O. Ap. J. 63, 177, 1926.Google Scholar
12. Westerhout, G. B.A.N. 14, 215, 1958.Google Scholar