Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T08:45:58.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Orbital Evolution of Planetary Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2016

Tapan K. Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science (FCC), Puebla A. University, Apartado Postal 1316, Puebla, Mexico. (E-mail tchat@excite.com)
V. B. Magalinsky
Affiliation:
Dept. of Theoretical Physics, University of the Friendship of Peoples, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is significant that the orbits of the planets in the solar system are very nearly circular, except for Mercury and Pluto where, conceivably, due to their comparatively small sizes, the tidal forces have played a less active role. Most of the suspected planets orbiting pulsars have nearly circular orbits. These systems tend to have minimum energy and are subjected to tidal forces. We find that a planet circularizes its orbit, in an effort to attain orbital stability and the ground state. Details can be found in Magalinsky & Chatterjee, 1997, and Magalinsky and Chatterjee, 2000.

Type
Part II: Progress in the theory of planet formation
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2004 

References

Heggie, D. C. 1975, MNRAS, 173, 729.Google Scholar
Hut, P. 1985, in IAU Symp. 113, Dynamics of Star Clusters, Eds. Goodman, J., Hut, P. (Dordrecht-Reidel), p. 103.Google Scholar
Magalinsky, V.B., & Chatterjee, T.K. 1997, Celest. Mech., 65, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magalinsky, V.B., & Chatterjee, T.K. 2000, Nuovo Cimento, in press.Google Scholar
Safronov, V.S. 1991, Icarus, 94, 260.Google Scholar