Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-22T09:51:51.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the ‘Thermodynamics’ of Self-Gravitating N-Body Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

R. H. Miller*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 60637, U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results of some simple ‘thermodynamic’ experiments on self-gravitating n-body systems are reported for a variety of boundary conditions. Systems placed in specularly reflecting enclosures did not show any unusual behavior, even though a variety of conditions was tried in an attempt to start a ‘gravothermal castastrophe’. Similarly, there was no tendency to transfer energy between ‘hot’ and ‘cool’ subclosures within a given cluster. However, systems in ‘isothermal’ enclosures gave up energy to the enclosure at a surprisingly high rate, and sustained the energy-transfer rate as long as the experiment was continued. An explanation of these different behaviors was sought and found in an examination of the premises that underlie certain attempts to construct a thermodynamics for self-gravitating systems. Conventional application of the H-theorem implies violations of the n-body equations of motion and predictions not consistent with observation. Both the ‘gravothermal catastrophe’ and the experiments in an ‘isothermal’ enclosure share this violation of the equations of motion. A new formulation that allows for all the interactions in an n-body system shows that isolated n-body systems need not form binaries or condense into other subaggregates. The virial theorem follows as an ensemble average over the micro-canonical ensemble.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974 

References

Antonov, V. A.: 1962, Vest. Leningrad Gos. Univ. 7, 135.Google Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. and Elbert, D. D.: 1971, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 155, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekhar, S. and Lee, E. P.: 1968, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 139, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khinchin, A. I.: 1957, Mathematical Foundations of Information Theory , Dover Publications, New York.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M.: 1969, Statistical Physics , Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D. and Wood, R.: 1968, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 138, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. H.: 1971, Astrophys. J. 165, 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. H.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 172, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. H.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 180, 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. H.: 1974, Advances in Chemical Physics (to be published).Google Scholar
Prigogine, I. and Severne, G.: 1966, Physica 32, 1376; Bull. Astron. (3) 3, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I., Nicolis, G., and Babloyantz, A.: 1972, Physics Today , November, 1972, pp. 2328; December 1972, pp. 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E.: 1948, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379; 27, 623; reprinted in Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W., The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar