Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T19:20:19.047Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-Gaussian Isocurvature Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

A.J. Stirling
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, Edinburgh University Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, U.K.
J.A. Peacock
Affiliation:
Institute for Astronomy, Edinburgh University Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, U.K.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Peebles (1997) has proposed a non-Gaussian χ2 isocurvature model which gives rise to early galaxy assembly at redshifts ≥ 3–4. We test whether the higher order moments (skewness and kurtosis) of such a model are compatible with the moments of the observed density field, and find that in the absence of bias these models produce moments that are much higher than those measured for the APM survey (Gaztañaga, 1994). We have applied different biasing schemes to see whether bias can bring the moments down, and find that for power law, Cen-Ostriker, and censor threshold biasing schemes (Mann et al 1997) the moments can be brought into agreement with the APM measurements only for linear bias values b > 3. This however, would give a redshift distortion parameter, βopticai = (Ω0.6/b) < 0.16 which is inconsistent with current estimates from redshift surveys of βoptical = 0.40 ± 0.12 (e.g. Peacock 1997). We conclude that for an acceptable level of bias in the schemes we have tested, the χ2 isocurvature model moments disagree with current measurements of skewness and kurtosis from the APM survey.

Type
IV. Structure Formation and Dark Matter
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999