Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:50:22.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is Chandler frequency constant?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

Jan Vondrák
Jan Vondrák*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Budečská 6, 120 23 Prague 2, Czechoslovakia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The observed polar motion in the period 1860–1985 is analyzed in order to decide whether Chandler frequency was constant. It is shown that while the phase of annual wobble was very stable throughout the interval in question, Chandler wobble phase was subject to sometimes very rapid changes. The most pronounced negative phase changes were always accompanied by extremely low amplitudes, and a significant correlation was found between Chandler wobble phase and its integrated amplitude. The most probable explanation is that the frequency of Chandler wobble is variable and amplitude-dependent, which might be caused by non-equilibrium response of the ocean.

Type
VI. Causes of Variations in Earth Rotation Parameters
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 128: Earth's Rotation and Reference Frames for Geodesy and Geodynamics , 1988 , pp. 359 - 364
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Carter, W.E., 1981, ‘Frequency Modulation of the Chandlerian Component of Polar Motion’, J. Geophys. Res. 86, 1653.Google Scholar
Carter, W.E., 1982, ‘Refinement of the Polar Motion Frequency Modulation Hypothesis’, J. Geophys. Res. 87, 1025.Google Scholar
Chandler, S.C., 1901, ‘On a New Component of the Polar Motion’, Astron.J. 21, 79.Google Scholar
Colombo, G. and Shapiro, I., 1968, ‘Theoretical Model for the Chandler Wobble’, Nature 217, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedorov, E.P. et al., 1972, Dvizhenyie polyusa Zemlis 1890.0 po 1969.0, Naukova dumka, Kiev.Google Scholar
Gaposchkin, E.M., 1972, ‘Analysis of Pole Positions from 1846–1970’, Rotation of the Earth, D. Reidel, 19.Google Scholar
Guinot, B., 1972, ‘The Chandlerian Wobble from 1900 to 1970’, Astron.Astrophys. 19, 207.Google Scholar
Guinot, B., 1982, ‘The Chandlerian Nutation from 1900 to 1980’, Geophys.J.R.Astron.Soc. 71, 295.Google Scholar
Lambeck, K., 1980, The Earth's Variable Rotation, Cambridge Univers. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pejović, N., 1983, ‘Preliminary analysis of the Secular and Main Harmonic Terms in Polar Motion’, Publ.Dept.Astron.Beograd 12, 41.Google Scholar
Proverbio, E. et al., 1972, ‘Analysis of the Chandler Period of Polar Coordinates Calculated by the Orlov Method’, Rotation of the Earth, D. Reidel, 43.Google Scholar
Rykhlova, L.V., 1970, Soobscheniya GAIS, 163.Google Scholar
Vondrák, J., 1985, ‘Long-period Behaviour of Polar Motion Between 1900.0 and 1984.0’, Annales Geophys. 3, 351.Google Scholar
Wilson, C.R. and Vicente, R.O., 1981, ‘Estimates of Chandler's Component of Polar Motion as Derived from Various Data Sets’, Astron.Nachr. 302, 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shou-xian, Wu et al., 1979, ‘Characteristic of Chandler's Polar Wobble’, Acta Astron. Sinica 20, 126.Google Scholar