Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T02:41:10.256Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The impact of comet D/Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

H. A. Weaver*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The collision of comet D/Shoemaker-Levy 9 with Jupiter in July 1994 was an unprecedented opportunity to witness a phenomenon that was ubiquitous in the early solar system and which continues to shape its evolution. The tidal breakup of the comet, and the subsequent evolution of its fragments, have provided important insights into the nature of cometary nuclei, although conclusions regarding the comet's fundamental properties remain controversial. Detailed models describing the passage of the fragments through the jovian atmosphere have been fairly successful in explaining many aspects of the observations, including the appearance of giant plumes extending >3000 km above Jupiter's limb, the huge infrared signals following the splashback of material into the jovian atmosphere, and the formation of dark impact scars over large regions at mid-southern jovian latitudes. New chemical species (e.g., CO, H2O, S2, CS2, CS, OCS, HCN, C2H4, and possibly H2S) were created in Jupiter's atmosphere due to the shock heating of the mixture of cometary and jovian gases. The large NH3 enhancement in the jovian stratosphere was apparently caused by heating of the ambient NH3 cloud followed by upwelling. The presence of metal atoms and ions in the jovian atmosphere was an unmistakable signature of the comet. Photochemistry may have played an important role in the temporal evolution of the newly-created species. The appearance of expanding rings emanating from the impact sites was originally explained as the propagation of gravity waves, but this required an oxygen abundance in the deep jovian atmosphere that was ∼10 times solar, an hypothesis that has been apparently contradicted by recent results from the Galileo probe. Although the impacts clearly produced dramatic effects in Jupiter's atmosphere, most traces of the trauma were barely discernible one year later.

Type
Comets and the Solar System
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1997 

References

Asphaug, E., Benz, W. 1996, Icarus 121, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atreya, S. K., Edgington, S., Trafton, L. M., Caldwell, J. J., Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A. 1995, GRL 22, 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chodas, P. W., Yeomans, D. K. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 81.Google Scholar
Crawford, D. A. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press), p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crovisier, J. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, P.D., Weaver, H.A., Boice, D. C., Stern, S. A. 1996, Icarus 121, 442.Google Scholar
Graham, J., de Pater, I., Jernigan, J., Liu, M., Brown, M. 1995, Science 267, 1320.Google Scholar
Hahn, J. M., Rettig, T. W., Mumma, M. J. 1996, Icarus 121, 291.Google Scholar
Hammel, H. B. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, A. P., Kanamori, H. 1996, in The Collission of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press), p. 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lellouch, E. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Low, M-M. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 157.Google Scholar
Moses, J. I. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 81.Google Scholar
Nakano, S., Marsden, B. G., 1993, IAU Circular 5800.Google Scholar
Nicholson, P. D. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 81.Google Scholar
Niemann, H. B. et al. 1996, Science 272, 846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1995, A&A 304, 296.Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, C. S., Shoemaker, E. M., Levy, D. 1993, IAU Circular 5725.Google Scholar
Weaver, H. A., et al. 1995, Science 267, 1282.Google Scholar
Yelle, R. V., McGrath, M. A. 1996, Icarus 119, 90.Google Scholar
Zahnle, K. 1996, in The Collision of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Jupiter, eds. Noll, K. S., Weaver, H. A., Feldman, P. D. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar