Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-z8dg2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T02:32:09.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cosmic Distribution of Optically Selected Quasars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Maarten Schmidt
Maarten Schmidt*
Affiliation:
Palomar Observatory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Counts of optically selected quasars as a function of magnitude and redshift show the effects of strong evolution. If quasars have relatively short life times, then the observed numbers at a given redshift are mostly determined by their birth rate and mean luminosity over their lifetime. In this case the evolution of the luminosity function can be described by density evolution, where the rate of evolution may depend on luminosity and other properties. On the other hand, if all quasars were formed at large redshift and have been decaying in luminosity since that time, then the evolution of the luminosity function is best described in terms of luminosity evolution. We discuss some of the consequences of luminosity evolution for the mass of quasars and for the X-ray background.

We explore the observational aspects of the redshift cutoff of quasars. The situation is complicated by the unavoidable bias in slitless surveys against weak-line objects. Since quasar emission lines show a wide range of equivalent widths, a spectral survey will be characterized by a distribution of limiting continuum magnitudes rather than by a single value. The decline in the space density of quasars at large redshift may depend on luminosity, and may also have structure, such as a steep drop, but not a total cutoff, in density at a redshift near 3.

Type
Chapter XI: Quasi-Stellar Objects: Distribution and General Properties
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 124: Observational Cosmology , 1987 , pp. 619 - 625
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Clowes, R.G. 1981, M.N.R.A.S., 197, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R.F. 1986, in IAU Symposium 119 on Quasars, held in Bangalore, December 1985.Google Scholar
Hazard, C., and McMahon, R. 1985, Nature, 314, 238.Google Scholar
Mathez, G. 1978, Astron. Atrophys., 68, 17.Google Scholar
Osmer, P.S. 1980, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 42, 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osmer, P.S. 1982, Astrophys. J., 253, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M. 1970, Astrophys. J., 162, 371.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., and Green, R.F. 1983, Astrophys. J., 269, 352.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., and Green, R.F. 1986, Astrophys. J., 305, 68.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Schneider, D.P., and Gunn, J.E. 1986a, Astrophys J., 306, 411.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Schneider, D.P., and Gunn, J.E. 1986b, Astrophys. J., 310, 000.Google Scholar
Smith, M.G. 1983, in ‘Quasars and Gravitational Lenses’, Proc. of the 24th Liège Colloquium (Université de Liege), p.4.Google Scholar
Veron, P. 1983, in ‘Quasars and Gravitational Lenses’, Proc. of the 24th Liège Colloquium (Université de Liège), p. 210.Google Scholar
Veron, P. 1986, Astron. Astrophys. (submitted).Google Scholar