Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-qks25 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T18:28:06.427Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contributions to the Local Gravitational Field from Beyond the Virgo Supercluster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

Amos Yahil
Amos Yahil*
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2100, USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the last decade, the inter-relation between the density structure and velocity perturbations in the local Virgo Supercluster (VSC) has provided a major means of determining the cosmological density parameter Ωo. The underlying dynamics, the so-called Virgocentric Flow Model (VFM), assumes that the relevant peculiar gravitational field in the VSC is dominated by the monopole term, due to material inside the VSC. Over the past year, however, this premise has been called into question, on both observational and theoretical grounds. It has become clear that the contributions to the local gravitational field from beyond the VSC cannot be neglected. The major new developments are summarized here. A more detailed review is given elsewhere (Yahil 1987).

Type
Chapter III. The Classical Quantities of Cosmology
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 124: Observational Cosmology , 1987 , pp. 247 - 250
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1987 

References

Bardeen, J.M., Bond, J.R., Kaiser, N., and Szalay, A.S. 1986, Astrophys. J., 304, 15.Google Scholar
Davis, M., Tonry, J., Huchra, J., and Latham, D. 1980, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 238, L113.Google Scholar
Davis, M., and Huchra, J. 1982, Astrophys. J., 254, 437.Google Scholar
Dressler, A. 1980, Astrophys. J., 236, 351.Google Scholar
Dressler, A., Faber, S.M., Burstein, D., Davies, R., Lynden-Bell, D., Terlevich, R., and Wegner, G. 1986, Astrophys. J., submitted.Google Scholar
Fixsen, D.J., Cheng, E.S., and Wilkinson, D.T. 1983, Phys. Rev. Letters, 50, 620.Google Scholar
Gunn, J.E. 1987, in Dark Matter in the Universe, eds. Knapp, G. and Kormendy, J. (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. 1984, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 284, L9.Google Scholar
Lilje, P.B., Yahil, A., and Jones, B.J.T. 1986, Astrophys. J., 307, 91.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A., Walker, D., Rowan-Robinson, M., Penston, M., and Leech, K. 1986, Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc., 219, 687.Google Scholar
Lubin, P.M., Epstein, G.L., and Smoot, G.F. 1983, Phys. Rev. Letters, 50, 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiksin, A., and Davis, M. 1986, Astr. J., 91, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, M. 1987, in Nearly Normal Galaxies: From the Planck Time to the Present, ed. Faber, S.M. (Berlin: Springer), in press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, R., and Silk, J. 1985, Astrophys. J., 292, 319.Google Scholar
Yahil, A. 1981, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 375, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahil, A. 1984, in The Virgo Cluster of Galaxies, ed Richter, O. G. and Binggeli, B. (Munich: ESO) pp. 359–373.Google Scholar
Yahil, A. 1986, in Galaxy Distances and Deviations from Universal Expansion, eds. Madore, B. F. and Tully, R. B. (Dordrecht: Reidel) pp. 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahil, A. 1987, in Nearly Normal Galaxies: From the Planck Time to the Present, ed. Faber, S.M. (Berlin: Springer), in press.Google Scholar
Yahil, A., Walker, D., and Rowan-Robinson, M. 1986, Astrophys. J. (Letters), 301, L1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahil, A., Sandage, A., and Tammann, G.A. 1980, Astrophys. J., 242, 448.Google Scholar