Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-m9pkr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:41:24.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bound on the amplitude of the Earth's free core–nutation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2017

T. A. Herring
Affiliation:
Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA. 02138
C. R. Gwinn
Affiliation:
Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA. 02138
B. A. Buffett
Affiliation:
Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA. 02138
I. I. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Harvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA. 02138

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We analyzed six years of very–long–baseline interferometry (VLBI) data and determined corrections to the coefficients of the seven terms with the largest amplitudes in the IAU 1980 nutation series. Our analysis yields results consistent with earlier analyses of smaller sets of VLBI data, within the uncertainties of the latter. Here, we restrict discussion to the freely excited core–nutation or “free core–nutation” (FCN). Our analysis yields an estimate of 0.33 ± 0.12 mas for an assumed constant amplitude of the FCN, which allows us to place an upper bound on it of 0.6 mas (99.5% confidence limit). We also studied possible temporal variations of the complex amplitude of the FCN by modeling it as a stochastic process with a white noise excitation. We detected no statistically significant variations of this amplitude for the six–year interval spanned by the VLBI data. However, in the neighborhood of one cycle per day, the power spectral density of the atmospheric surface loading is estimated from global weather data to be 0.24 (g cm−2)2 day, about five times larger than the largest such power spectral density that would be consistent with the upper bound on the amplitude of the FCN placed by the VLBI data. Thus, we conclude that this estimate is too high and that, if the FCN were excited by surface loads with frequencies near one cycle per day, then the power spectral density of these loads must be <0.06 (g cm−2)2 day (99.9% confidence limit).

Type
V. Precession & Nutation
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1988 

References

Eubanks, T.M. et al., in “Proc. of the international conference on earth rotation and the terrestrial reference frame”, Ohio State University, 326340, 1985.Google Scholar
Gwinn, C.R. et al., EOS, 65, 859, 1984.Google Scholar
Gwinn, C.R. et al., J. Geophys. Res., 91, 47554765, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herring, T.A. et al., EOS, 64, 674, 1983.Google Scholar
Herring, T.A. et al., in “Proc. of the international conference on earth rotation and the terrestrial reference frame”, Ohio State University, 307325, 1985.Google Scholar
Herring, T.A. et al., J. Geophys. Res., 91, 47454754, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebelt, P.B., “An introduction to optimal estimation”, Addison–Wesley, 273, 1967.Google Scholar
Sasao, T. and Wahr, J.M., Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 64, 729746, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahr, J.M. and Sasao, T., Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soc., 64, 747765, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar