Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:18:05.843Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bochum Milky Way Surface Photometry: An Overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2017

Theodor Schmidt-Kaler
Theodor Schmidt-Kaler*
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute Ruhr-Universität Bochum Postfach 102148, D-4630 Bochum 1 FRG

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Photoelectric photometry is inherently much more accurate than photographic work. But large time variations of airglow, inaccurate elimination of bright stars, and the problematic adding-up of different scans may destroy this advantage in the case of surface photometry. On the other hand, the low internal accuracy of photographic photometry and its problematic nonlinearity can be overcome by a sufficient number of plates and by careful photoelectric calibrations. Such measures allow us to take full advantage of the high homogeneity of super-wide-angle photographs over extremely large areas, their global calibration, and their direct imaging. When I started this work, no charge-coupled device or similar device was available. But even today, with such detectors problems would arise for surface photometry in flat-fielding, zero-points, and bright star elimination. Our camera (Schlosser and Schmidt-Kaler 1977) followed the Henyey-Greenstein design with a f/4.3 Zeiss UV-Sonnar lens (with constant focus from 2000 Å up to 10000 Å) and f/0.4 spherical mirror of 30 cm ⊘, giving an effective f=18 mm. The angular resolution, limited by optics and plate, is 4′ in the center, 7′ in the average, and about 20′ at the edges of the field of view (=140°).

Type
II. Galactic Background Starlight from UV to IR: Observations and Models
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 139: The Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation , 1990 , pp. 100 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1990 

References

REFERENCES

Ashburn, E. V. 1954, J. Atmosph. Terr. Phys., 5, 83.Google Scholar
Dumont, R. 1965, Ann. d'Astrophys. 28, 265.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, B., Kimeswenger, S., Schlosser, W., Schmidt-Kaler, Th., Seidensticker, K. J. 1989, in Proc. IAU 139, Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation, ed. Bowyer, S. and Leinert, Ch., Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Pulisher.Google Scholar
Levasseur-Regourd, A. C., Dumont, R. 1980, Astron. Astrophys., 84, 277.Google Scholar
Ochsenbein, F. 1978, Bull. Inf. CDS, No. 15.Google Scholar
Schlosser, W., Schmidt-Kaler, Th., Hünecke, W. 1974, Atlas der Milchstraße, Bochum; see also Vistas in Astr. 21, 447, 1977.Google Scholar
Schlosser, W., Schmidt-Kaler, Th. 1977, Vistas in Astr. 21, 447.Google Scholar
Schlosser, W., Görnandt, V. 1984, Astron. Astrophys. 137, 287.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kaler, Th., Schlosser, W. 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 29, 409.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kaler, Th., Seidensticker, K.J., Pröll, H.J., Schlosser, W., Beck, R. 1983, Astron. Astrophys. Supp. 51, 1.Google Scholar
Seidensticker, K., Schmidt-Kaler, Th. 1989, in Proc. IAU 139, Galactic and Extragalactic Background Radiation, ed. Bowyer, S. and Leinert, Ch., Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publisher, and references therein.Google Scholar
Toolin, R. B. 1965, in “Handbook of Geophysics and Space Environments,” ed. Valley, S. L., Air Force Cambridge Res. Lab., McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Tüg, H., Schmidt-Kaler, Th. 1982, Astron. Astrophys. 105, 400.Google Scholar
Winkler, Chr., Schmidt-Kaler, Th., Schlosser, W. 1985, Astron. Astrophys. 143, 194.Google Scholar