Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:27:39.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Array Polarimetry and Optical-Differencing Photometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2017

J. Tinbergen
J. Tinbergen*
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Observatory Roden and Sterrewacht Leiden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Array detectors have improved the efficiency of optical polarimetry sufficiently for this technique to become part of the standard arsenal of observational facilities. However, we could gain even more: spatially-differentiating photometry can be implemented as an option of array Polarimeters and low-noise, high-frame-rate array detectors will allow extremely high precision both in polarimetry and in such differentiating photometry. The latter would be valuable for analyzing many kinds of optical or infrared images of very low contrast; the essence of the technique is to use optical (and extremely stable) means to produce the spatial derivative of the flux image, in the form of a polarization image which is then presented to a “standard” array polarimeter. The polarimeter should incorporate a polarization modulator of sufficient quality for the photometric application in mind. If developed properly, using a state-of-the-art array detector and the most sensitive type of polarization modulator (stress-birefringence), optical differencing will allow levels of relative photometric precision not otherwise obtainable. With the optical differencing option taken out of the beam, the same instrument can be used for high-quality polarimetry.

Type
Section I — Review Papers
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 167: New Developments in Array Technology and Applications , 1995 , pp. 197 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1995 

References

Hough, J. H., Chrysostomou, A. and Bailey, J. A. 1994 in Infrared Astronomy with Arrays: The Next Generation, McLean, I. S., ed., Astrophys. and Space Science Library 190, Kluwer Academic Pub., Dordrecht, p. 287.Google Scholar
Jorden, P. R., Deltorn, J.-M. and Oates, A. P. 1994 in Instrumentation in Astronomy VIII, SPIE. 2198 (in press), paper 57.Google Scholar
Kemp, J. C. 1969 Jour. Opt. Soc. Am. 59, 950.Google Scholar
Scarrott, S. M., Warren-Smith, R. F., Pallister, W. S., Axon, D. J. and Bingham, R. G. 1983 MNRAS 204, 1163.Google Scholar
Soucail, G., Cuillandre, J. C., Fort, B. and Picat, J. P. 1995 in IAU Symposium No. 167, New Developments in Array Technology and Applications, Philip, A. G. D., Janes, K. A. and Upgren, A. R., eds, Kluwer Academic Pub., p. 263.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1993 in IAU Colloquium No. 136, Stellar Photometry — Current Techniques and Future Developments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p. 130 and 264.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1995 Astronomical Polarimetry, Cambridge University Press, in preparation.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. and Rutten, R. G. M. 1992 A User Guide to WHT Spectropolarimetry, La Palma User Manual no 21, Royal Greenwich Observatory, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ueno, M. 1995 in IAU Symposium No. 167, New Developments in Array Technology and Applications, Philip, A. G. D., Janes, K. A. and Upgren, A. R., eds, Kluwer Academic Pub., p. 117.Google Scholar
Young, A. T. 1967 AJ 72, 747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar