Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T09:31:27.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UNDERSTANDING SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION. Rod Ellis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985. Pp. 327.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Michael Long
Michael Long
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii at Manoa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 79 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chaudron, C. (1987). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1984). Classroom second language development. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Gatbonton, E. (1978). Patterned phonetic variability in second language speech: A gradual diffusion model. Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 335–347.Google Scholar
Gregg, K. (in press). Krashen's theory, acquisition theory, and theory. In Barasch, R. (Ed.), Responses to Krashen. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1987). Instructed interlanguage development. Issues in second language acquisition: Multiple perspectives. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B., Rossman, T., & McLeod, B. (1983). Second language learning: An information-processing perspective. Language Learning, 33 (2), 135–158.Google Scholar
Parrish, B., & Tarone, E. (1986). Article use in interlanguage: A study in task-related variability. Paper presented at the 20th TESOL Convention, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. (1980). The sensitive period and the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30 (2), 449–472.Google Scholar
Pavesi, M. (1984). The acquisition of relative clauses in a formal and in an informal setting: Further evidence in support of the markedness hypothesis. In Singleton, D. M. & Little, D. G. (Eds.), Language learning in formal and informal contexts. Dublin: IRAAL.Google Scholar
Sato, C. J. (1985). Task variation in interlanguage phonology. In Gass, S. M. & Madden, C. G. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. C. (1983). Discourse accent in second language performance. In Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (Eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar