Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-27T06:04:09.425Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A SHORT SURVEY ON CAUSAL INFERENCE, WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR CONTEXT OF LEARNING STUDIES OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2004

Nicole A. Lazar
Nicole A. Lazar
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study of SLA, as is true for much social science research, aims broadly at answering questions of causality—for instance, “Is one learning context more likely than another to promote gains in second language learning?” Context-of-learning research in the study of SLA, however, often involves observational, rather than experimental, manipulation of subjects. As is well known, this compromises the ability to draw causal inferences. There are some interesting possibilities for overcoming this handicap, arising from recent statistical theory. In particular, the so-called Rubin causal model has some advantages over other approaches, such as path analysis, that are more familiar to social scientists. The purpose of this article is to relate ideas of causal inference to the studies presented in this thematic issue and to suggest how they may be useful to future research in SLA, particularly in context-of-learning studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , June 2004 , pp. 329 - 347
Copyright
© 2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Cohen, A. D. (1999). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Blalock, H. M., Jr. (Ed.). (1971). Causal models in the social sciences. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Brecht, R., & Davidson, D. (1991, March). Language acquisition gains in study abroad: Program assessment and modification. Paper presented at the National Foreign Language Center Conference on Language Testing, Washington, DC.
Brecht, R., Davidson, D., & Ginsberg, R. (1990). The empirical study of proficiency gain in study abroad environments of American students of Russian. In D. Davidson (Ed.), American contributions to the 7th International Congress of MAPRIAL ( pp. 123–152). Washington, DC: American Council of Teachers of Russian.
Cochran, W. G. (1965). The planning of observational studies of human populations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 182, 234–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookes, G. (1997). SLA and language pedagogy: A socioeducational perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawid, A. P. (1979). Conditional independence in statistical theory (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 41, 1–31.Google Scholar
Dawid, A. P. (2000). Causal inference without counterfactuals (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 407–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1991). Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 104–119). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Freedman, D. (1987). As others see us: A case study in path analysis (with discussion). Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 101–223.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A. S., & Duncan, O. D. (1973). Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press.
Guntermann, G. (1995). The Peace Corps experience: Language learning in training and in the field. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 149–169). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huebner, T. (1995). The effects of overseas language programs: Report on a case study of an intensive Japanese course. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 171–193). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lafford, B. (1995). Getting into, through, and out of a survival situation: A comparison of communicative strategies used by students studying Spanish abroad and “at home.” In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 97–121). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Lauritzen, S. L. (1996). Graphical models. Oxford: Clarendon.
Meara, P. (1994). The year abroad and its effects. Language Learning Journal, 10, 32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellow, J. D. (2002). Toward principled eclecticism in language teaching: The two-dimensional model and the centering principle [Electronic version]. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 5, 1–19.Google Scholar
Möhle, D. (1984). A comparison of the second language speech of different native speakers. In H. Dechert, D. Möhle, & M. Raupach (Eds.), Second language productions (pp. 26–49). Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
Neyman, J. (1990). On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments: Essay on principles—Section 9. (D. M. Dabrowska & T. P. Speed, Trans. & Eds.) Statistical Science, 5, 463–472. (Original work published 1923.)Google Scholar
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, 157–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research (with discussion). Biometrika, 82, 669–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pearl, J. (2003). Statistics and causal inference: A review. (Technical Report R-313.) University of California, Los Angeles.CrossRef
Pratt, J. W., & Schlaifer, R. (1984). On the nature and discovery of structure (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, V. (1995). The acquisition of sociolinguistic native speech norms: Effects of a year abroad on second language learners of French. In B. F. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 245–268). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1984). From association to causation in observational studies: The role of tests of strongly ignorable treatment assignment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983a). Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 45, 212–218.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983b). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 516–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1977). Assignment of treatment group on the basis of a covariate. Journal of Educational Statistics, 2, 1–26.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. B. (1978). Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 34–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sobel, M. E. (2000). Causal inference in the social sciences. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 647–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, J. (1990). Graphical models in applied multivariate statistics. New York: Wiley.
Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1934). The method of path coefficients. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 5, 161–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabell, S. L. (2001). Ronald Aylmer Fisher. In C. C. Heyde & E. Seneta (Eds.), Statisticians of the centuries (pp. 389–397). New York: Springer.