Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T09:28:27.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neurological Bimodality and Theories of Language Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Marcel Danesi
Marcel Danesi
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The failure of the method notion in second language teaching has been attributed to a series of valid pedagogical and socioeducational factors. The concept of neurological bimodality, which posits that effective language learning in a classroom environment requires the utilization of the perceptual modalities associated with each cerebral hemisphere, offers a more fundamental, neurologically related diagnosis of this failure. This paper looks at the historiography of language teaching theories from the perspective of bimodality, and then concludes with specific suggestions vis-à-vis the kinds of research directions that might empirically substantiate the usefulness of this concept for second language acquisition in a classroom environment.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , February 1988 , pp. 13 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M., & Obler, L. K. (1978). The bilingual brain. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. A., Caplan, D., & Marshall, J. C. (1982). Neurolinguistics in historical perspective. In Arbib, M. A., Caplan, D., & Marshall, J. C. (Eds.), Neural models of language processes (pp. 5–24). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Asher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks.Google Scholar
Benderly, B. F. (1981). The multilingual mind. Psychology Today, 15, 9–12.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1978). A theoretical model of second language learning. Language Learning, 28, 69–83.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of linguistic knowledge in second language use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 4, 31–45.Google Scholar
Blakeslee, T. R. (1980). The right brain. New York: Berkley.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1942). Outline guide for the practical study of foreign languages. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Bogen, J. E. (1975). Some educational aspects of hemispheric specialization. UCLA Educator, 17, 24–32.Google Scholar
Bogen, J. E., De Zare, R., TenHouten, W., & Marsh, J. (1972). The other side of the brain: The A/P ratio. Bulletin of the Los Angeles Neurological Society, 37, 49–61.Google Scholar
Broca, P. (1861). Remarques sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé, suivies d'une observation d'aphémie. Bulletin de la Société d'Anthropologie, 36, 330–357.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching: The roles of fluency and accuracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. (1982). Grammatical man. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Carroll, F. W. (1960). Neurolmguistic processing of a second language. In Scarcella, R. S. & Krashen, S. D. (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 81–85). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1965). The contribution of psychological theory and educational research to the teaching of foreign languages. Modern Language Journal, 49, 273–281.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1981). Conscious and automatic processes in language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 37, 462–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chastain, K. (1971). The development of modern language skills: Theory to practice. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1982). Neurolmguistics and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 305–306.Google Scholar
Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (1986). Bilingualism in education. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Curran, C. A. (1976). Counselling–learning in second languages. Apple River, IL: Apple River.Google Scholar
Curtiss, S. (1977). Genie: A psycholinguistic study of a modern-day wild child. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (1984). Lateralization, affect, metaphors, and language use. Interfaces, II, 41–46.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (1986a). Research on the brain's hemisphenc functions: Implications for second language pedagogy. Lenguas Modernas, 13, 109–123.Google Scholar
Danesi, M. (1986b). Le coordinate neurologiche dell'apprendimento linguistico: Osservazioni psicopedagogiche. In De Lellis, M., Giampietro, M., & Mastracci, M. (Eds.), Il codice della mente (pp. 1–20). L'Aquila: Sigma-Tau.Google Scholar
Danly, M., & Shapiro, B. (1982). Speech prosody in Broca's aphasia. Brain and Language, 16, 171–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M., & Whitaker, H. (1976). Language acquisition following hemidecortication: Linguistic superiority of the left over the right hemisphere. Brain and Language, 3, 404–433.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. (1979). Drawing on the right side of the brain. Los Angeles: Tardier.Google Scholar
Folder, N. S., Cicone, M., & Gardner, H. (1983). Pragmatic aspects of communication in brain-damaged patients. In Segalowitz, S. J. (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization (pp. 51–86). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Fries, C. C. (1945). Teaching and learning English as a foreign language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V., Krashen, S., Curtiss, S., Rigler, D., & Rigler, M. (1974). The development of language in Genie: A case of language acquisition beyond the “critical period.” Brain and Language, 1, 81–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, L. (1981). The convolutions of second language: A theoretical article with a critical review of some hypotheses towards a neurophysiological model of bilingualism and second language performance. Language Learning, 31, 439–464.Google Scholar
Galloway, L. (1982). Bilingualism: Neuropsychological considerations. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 15, 12–28.Google Scholar
Galloway, L., & Krashen, S.D. (1980). Cerebral organization in bilingualism and second language. In Scarcella, R.C. & Krashen, S. D. (Eds.), Research in second language acquisition (pp. 74–80). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gattegno, C. (1976). The common sense of teaching foreign languages. New York: Educational Solutions.Google Scholar
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1983). Right hemisphere language following brain bisection: A 20 year perspective. American Psychologist, 38, 525–537.Google Scholar
Genessee, F. (1982). Experimental neuropsychoiogical research on second language processing. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 315–322.Google Scholar
Gloning, I., & Gloning, K. (1965). Aphasien bei Polyglotten: Beitrag zur Dynamik des Sprachbaus sowie Lokalizationsfrage dieser Störungen. Weiner Zeitschrift für Nervenheilkunde, 22, 363–397.Google Scholar
Goldberg, E., & Costa, L. D. (1981). Hemispheric differences in the acquisition and use of descriptive systems. Brain and Language, 14, 144–173.Google Scholar
Gouin, F. (1882). The art of teaching and learning languages. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1964). Syntax and the consumer. Georgetown Monograph Series in Language and Linguistics, 17, 11–18.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Heilman, K. W., Scholes, R., & Watson, R. T. (1977). Auditory affective agnosia: Disturbed comprehension of affective speech. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 38, 69–72.Google Scholar
Herron, C. (1982). Foreign–language learning approaches as metaphor. Modern Language Journal, 66, 235–242.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In Pride, J. B. & Holmes, J. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected Readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1904). How to teach a foreign language. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson-Weiner, K. M. (1984). The effects of right and left hemisphere damage on the comprehension of stress in English. In Manning, A., Martin, P., & McCalla, K. (Eds.), The tenth LACUS forum (The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States) (pp. 464–473). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Kelly, L. G. (1969). 25 centuries of language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1977). The monitor model for adult second language performance. In Burt, M., Dulay, H., & Finocchiaro, M. (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp. 152–161). New York: Regents.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergarnon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., Seliger, H., & Hartnett, O. (1974). Two studies in adult second language learning. Kritikon Literarum, 3, 220–228.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D., & Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural approach: Language acquisition in the classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lamendella, J. T. (1977). General principles of neurofunctional organization and their manifestation in primary and nonprimary language acquisition. Language Learning, 27, 155–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, J. (1985). Right brain, left brain: Fact and fiction. Psychology Today, 19, 38–44.Google Scholar
Levy, J., Trevarthen, C., & Sperry, R. W. (1972). Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric disconnexion. Brain, 95, 61–78.Google Scholar
Mackey, W. F. (1965). Language teaching analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
McArthur, T. (1983). A foundation course for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Millar, J. M., & Whitaker, H. (1983). The right hemisphere's contribution to language: A review of the evidence from brain–damaged subjects. In Segalowitz, S. (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization (pp. 83–113). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Molfese, V. J., Molfese, D. L., & Parsons, C. (1983). Hemisphere processing of phonological information. In Segalowitz, S. (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization (pp. 29–49). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovitch, M. (1983). Stages of processing and hemispheric differences in language in the normal subject. In Sruddert-Kennedy, M. (Ed.), Psychobiology of language (pp. 88–104). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Obler, L. (1960). Right hemisphere participation in second language acquisition. In Diller, K. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 87–98). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Obler, L., Albert, M. L., & Gordon, H. (1975). Asymmetrical cerebral dominance in bilinguals. Paper presented at the Academy of Aphasia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Omaggio, A. C. (1986). Teaching language in context. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Paivio, A., & Begg, I. (1981). Psychology of language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1917). The scientific study and teaching of languages. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1921). The principles of language study. London: Harrap.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. E. (1922). The oral method of teaching languages. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching foreign language skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, E. D., & Mesulam, M. M. (1979). Dominant language functions of the right hemisphere? Archives of Neurology, 36, 144–148.Google Scholar
Savignon, S. (1983). Communicative competence: Theory and classroom practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Scherer, G. A. C., & Wertheimer, M. (1964). A psycholinguistic experiment in foreign language teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schnitzer, M. L. (1978). Cerebral lateralization and plasticity: Their relevance to language acquisition. In Paradis, M. (Ed.), The fourth LACUS forum (The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States) (pp. 114–120). Columbia, SC: Hornbeam.Google Scholar
Schwartz, G.E., Davidson, R. J., & Maer, F. (1975). Right hemispheric lateralization for emotions in the human brain: Interactions with cognition. Science, 190, 286–288.Google Scholar
Scovel, T. (1982). Questions concerning the applicability of neurolmguistic research to second language learning/teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 323–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, S. J. (1983a). The two sides of the brain: Brain lateralization explored. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, S. J. (Ed.). (1983b). Language functions and brain organization. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Segalowitz, S. J., & Gruber, J. (Eds.). (1977). Language development and neurological theory. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. W. (1982). On the possible role of the right hemisphere in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 307–314.Google Scholar
Smith, P. D. (1970). A comparison of the cognitive and audiolingual approaches to foreign language instruction: The Pennsylvania Project. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W. (1968). Hemisphere disconnection and unity in conscious awareness. American Psychologist, 23, 723–733.Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W. (1973). Lateral specialization of cerebral function on the surgically separated hemispheres. In McGuigan, F. J. & Schooner, R. A. (Eds.), The psychophysiology of thinking (pp. 209–229). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W., Gazzaniga, M. S., & Bogen, J. E. (1969). Interhemispheric relationships: The neocortical commissures; syndromes of hemispheric disconnection. In Vinken, P. J. & Bruyn, G. W. (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology (pp. 273–289). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1985). Formulating a theory of second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 269–288.Google Scholar
Springer, S. P., & Deutsch, G. (1985). Left brain, right brain, (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strasheim, L. (1976). What is a foreign language teacher today? Canadian Modern Language Review, 33, 39–48.Google Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1982). Evaluating bilingual education: A Canadian case study. Clevedon, England: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1889). The practical study of languages: A guide for teachers and learners. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Titone, R. (1968). Teaching foreign languages: An historical sketch. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Titone, R. (1977). A humanistic approach to language behavior and language learning. Canadian Modern Language Review, 33, 309–317.Google Scholar
Titone, R., & Danesi, M. (1985). Applied psycholinguistics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Vaid, J. (1983). Bilingualism and brain lateralization. In Segalowitz, S. J. (Ed.), Language functions and brain organization (pp. 315–339). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Valdman, A., & Warriner-Burke, H. P. (1980). Major surgery due: Redesigning the syllabus and texts. Foreign Language Annals, 13, 261–270.Google Scholar
Viëtor, W. (1882). Der Sprachunterricht muss umkehren! Ein Beitrag zur Uberbürdungsfrage. Heilbronn: Springer.Google Scholar
Vildomec, V. (1963). Multilingualism. Leyden, The Netherlands: Sythoff.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E., & Gardner, H. (1977). The comprehension of metaphor in brain–damaged patients. Brain, 10, 717–729.Google Scholar
Zaidel, E. (1983a). On multiple representations of the lexicon in the brain: The case of two hemispheres. In Studdert-Kennedy, M. (Ed.), Psychobiology of language (pp. 105–125), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zaidel, E. (1983b). A response to Gazzaniga: Language in the right hemisphere, convergent perspectives. American Psychologist, 38, 342–346.Google Scholar