Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:36:07.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

L2 DEVELOPMENT OF PERCEPTUAL CATEGORIZATION OF DIALECTAL SOUNDS

A STUDY IN SPANISH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Lauren B. Schmidt
Lauren B. Schmidt*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lauren B. Schmidt, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182-6010, USA. E-mail: lschmidt@sdsu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examined second language (L2) development in the perceptual identification of a dialectal sound of the target language, through an investigation of the role of individual learner experiences in L2 phonological development. A total of 213 English-speaking learners of Spanish across five levels of study and with varying dialect contact experiences completed an identification task, which tested perceptual categorization of Spanish dialectal aspirated-s (e.g., siesta [ˈsi̯eh-ta]). In accordance with postulates of L2 speech perception models (PAM-L2, SLM, L2LP), findings revealed influence of the first language phonology on categorization at early levels shifting toward nativelike, dialect-specific categorizations of aspirated-s for more experienced learners. Dialect contact factors of prior study abroad location, native speaker social contacts, and metalinguistic training were found to be predictors of the dialectal perceptual targets toward which the L2 learners developed—for those learners past intermediate-level language courses—highlighting how individual experiences shape L2 perceptual abilities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 857 - 882
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author would like to thank Kimberly Geeslin, Isabelle Darcy, Erik Willis, and Manuel Díaz-Campos for their mentorship and support in the development of this project, as well as the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on versions of the manuscript. She would also like to acknowledge Sandra Ortiz in her assistance in the creation of the speech stimuli as well as Andy Johns and colleagues in the Masters Program in Applied Linguistics at the Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas for their assistance in obtaining participants.

References

REFERENCES

Baker, W., & Smith, L. C. (2010). The impact of L2 dialect on learning French vowels: Native English speakers learning Quebecois and European French. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66, 711–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., Eddington, D., & Lyndsey, N. (2009). Dialect identification: The effects of region of origin and amount of experience. American Speech, 84, 48–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayley, R. (1996). Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In Bayley, R. & Preston, D. (Eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation (pp. 97–120). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beebe, L. (1980). Sociolinguistic variation and style shifting in SLA. Language Learning, 30, 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: Commonalities and complementarities. In Bohn, O. S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second-language speech learning: In honor of James Emil Flege (pp. 13–34). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenik, D. (2009). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.18) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohotaru, P. (2004). Variación de -/s/ en la habla de habaneros universitarios: Condicionamiento lingüístico y social. In Valdés Bernal, S. (Ed.), Pensamiento lingüístico sobre el Caribe insular hispánico (pp. 68–110). Santo Domingo: Academia de Ciencias de la República Dominicana.Google Scholar
Drummond, R. (2012). The Manchester Polish STRUT: Dialect acquisition in a second language. Journal of English Linguistics, 41, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P. (2005). Linguistic perception and second language acquisition: Explaining the attainment of optimal phonological categorization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
File-Muriel, R. J. (2007). The role of lexical frequency and phonetic context in the weakening of syllable-final lexical /s/ in the Spanish of Barranquilla, Colombia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning. Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–277). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Fox, R. A., & McGory, J. T. (2007). Second language acquisition of a regional dialect of American English by native Japanese speakers. In Bohn, O. S. & Munro, M. J. (Eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning (pp. 117–134). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2008). Comparing interview and written elicitation tasks in native and non-native data: Do speakers do what we think they do? In Bruhn de Garavito, J. & Valenzuela, E. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 10th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 64–77). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Gudmestad, A. (2011). The acquisition of variation in second-language Spanish: An agenda for integrating studies of the L2 sound system. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5, 137–157.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., & Long, A. Y. (2014). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition: Learning to use language in context. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Geeslin, K. L., Gudmestad, A., Kanwit, M., Linford, B., Long, A. Y., Schmidt, L., et al. . (2018). Sociolinguistic competence and the acquisition of speaking. In Alonso, R. (Ed.), Speaking in a second language (pp. 2–25). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
George, A. (2014). Study abroad in central Spain: The development of regional phonological features. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, R. M. (2001). The sounds of Spanish: Analysis and application (with special reference to American English). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006). Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 458–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N. C., Geeslin, K. L., & Willis, E. W. (2010). The development of L2 Spanish intonation during a study abroad immersion program in Léon, Spain: Global contours and final boundary movements. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3, 113–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, M., Mougeon, R., & Dewaele, J. M. (2013). Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. In Bayley, R., Cameron, R., & Lucas, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sociolinguistics (pp. 340–359). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 24.0) [Computer software]. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
Knouse, S. M. (2012). The acquisition of dialectal phonemes in a study abroad context: The case of the Castilian theta. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 512–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (2006). A course in phonetics. Boston, MA: Thomson Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Lafford, B. (1986). Valor diagnóstico-social del uso de ciertas variantes de /s/ en el español de Cartagena, Colombia. In Núñez Cedeño, R. A., Páez Urdaneta, I., & Guitart, J. M. (Eds.), Estudios sobre la fonología del español del Caribe (pp. 53–75). Caracas, Venezuela: La Casa de Bello.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1994). Latin American Spanish. London, UK: Longmans.Google Scholar
Marriott, H. (1995). The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In Freed, B. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 198–224). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. M. S. (2002). An introduction to English phonology. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18, 62–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raish, M. (2015). The acquisition of an Egyptian phonological variant by U.S. students in Cairo. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehner, K. (2002). The development of aspects of linguistic and discourse competence by advanced second language learners of French (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Rehner, K., Mougeon, R., & Nadasdi, T. (2003). The learning of sociolinguistic variation by advanced FSL learners: The case of “nous” vs. “on” in immersion French. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 127–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringer-Hilfinger, K. (2012). Learner acquisition of dialect variation in a study abroad context: The case of the Spanish [θ]. Foreign Language Annals, 45, 430–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz-Sánchez, C. (2004). El comportamiento de la /s/ implosiva en el habla de Caracas. Boletín de Lingüística, 21, 48–65.Google Scholar
Salgado-Robles, F. (2011). The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation by learners of Spanish in a study abroad context (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gainesville: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Samper Padilla, J. A. (1990). Estudio sociolingüístico del español de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain: La Caja de Canarias.Google Scholar
Schmidt, L. B. (2015). Effects of regional Media, travel, and social contacts on the perception of Spanish aspirated-/s/. Borealis—An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 4, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. C., & Baker, W. (2011). L2 dialect acquisition of German vowels: The case of Northern German and Austrian dialects. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 47, 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W., & Shafer, V. L. (2008). Speech perception in second language learners: The re-education of selective perception. In Hansen Edwards, J. G. & Zampini, M. L. (Eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition (pp. 153–191). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M., & Samuel, A. G. (2009). The effect of experience on the perception and representation of dialect variants. Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 487–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, T. (1979). Final /s/ in Cuban Spanish. Hispania, 62, 599–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrell, T. (1981). Diachronic reconstructions by dialect comparison of variable constraints: s-aspiration and deletion in Spanish. In Sankoff, D. & Cedergren, H. (Eds.), Variation ombibus (pp. 115–124). Carbondale, IL: Linguistic Research Inc.Google Scholar
Trimble, J. C. (2013). Perceiving intonational cues in a foreign language: Study abroad and its effect on the perception of sentence type in two dialects of Spanish. In Howe, C., Blackwell, S., & Quesada, M. (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 15th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 78–92). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Valdman, A. (1988). Classroom foreign language learning and language variation: The notion of pedagogical norms. World Englishes, 7, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leussen, J.-W., & Escudero, P. (2015). Learning to perceive and recognize a second language: The L2LP model revised. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfram, W., Carter, P., & Moriello, B. (2004). Emerging Hispanic English: New dialect formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. (1988). Approaches to variation in interlanguage: Plural marking in the speech of Chinese learners of English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Schmidt supplementary material

Schmidt supplementary material 1

Download Schmidt supplementary material(File)
File 106.5 KB