Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:35:24.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Differences in Second Language Learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Peter Skehan
Peter Skehan
Affiliation:
Ealing College, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article is broadly concerned with the differences between individual language learners. In terms of particular content areas of Individual Differences (ID) research, it surveys developments in foreign language aptitude, motivation, learner strategies, and learner styles. A brief review of earlier research on aptitude is presented, followed by discussions of more contemporary work on the origin of aptitude, namely, as a residue of first language learning ability, and on the existence of evidence for “learner types.” Motivation research is reviewed partly with regard to Robert Gardner's research, and then in terms of a wider framework for the functioning of motivation within an educational context. The review of learner strategies research emphasizes current attempts to develop taxonomies of such strategies, and to investigate their theoretical basis and their trainability. Finally, learner styles research, drawing on field independence theory, is discussed, and links are made with the research on aptitude. The article finishes with sections on conceptual and methodological issues in ID research.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 275 - 298
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Au, S. Y. (1988). A critical appraisal of Gardner's social-psychological theory of second-language (L2) learning. Language Learning, 38, 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E.. (1990). Communication strategies. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In Flavell, J. H. & Markham, E. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Burstall, C. (1975). Factors affecting foreign language learning: A consideration of some recent research findings. Language Teaching Abstracts, 8, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1965). The prediction of success in foreign language training. In Glaser, R. (Ed.), Training, research, and education (pp. 87–136). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1973). Implications of aptitude test research and psycholinguistic theory for foreign language teaching. International Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2, 5–14.Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. (1959). Modern Languages Aptitude Test—Form A. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Chamot, A. U., & Kupper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chihara, T., & Oller, J. (1978). Attitudes and attained proficiency in EFL: A sociolinguistic study of adult Japanese speakers. Language Learning, 28, 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Clément, R. (1986). Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 5, 271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, R., & Kruidenier, B. (1985). Aptitude, attitude, and motivation in second language proficiency: A test of Clément's model. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interaction. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. (1989). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 5, 217–256.Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualising motivation in foreign-language learning. Language Learning, 40, 45–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, G., & Sinclair, B. (1989). Learning to learn English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. (1978). Cluster analysis (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1979). Social-psychological aspects of second language acquisition. In Giles, H. & Clair, R. St. (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 193–220). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1980). On the validity of affective variables in second language acquisition: Conceptual, contextual, and statistical considerations. Language Learning, 30, 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C. (1988). The socio-educational model of second language learning: Assumptions, findings, and issues. Language Learning, 38, 101–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. C, Clement, R., Smythe, P. C, & Smythe, C. L. (1979). Attitude and motivation test battery-Revised manual (Research Bulletin No. 15). London, Ontario: Language Research Group, Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S. (1982). The resilience of recursion: A study of a communication system developed without a conventional language model. In Wanner, E. & Gleitman, L. (Eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art (pp. 51–77). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, P. S. (1975). Aptitude testing: An ongoing experiment. Audio-Visual Language Journal, 12, 205–210.Google Scholar
Hansen, L. (1984). Field dependence-independence and language testing: Evidence from six Pacific Island cultures. TESOL Quarterly, 18, 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J., & Stansnfield, C. (1991). The relationship of field dependent-independent cognitive styles to foreign language achievement. Language Learning, 31, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, G. (1980). Attitudes and success in children's learning of English as a second language: The motivational vs. resultative hypothesis. English Language Teaching Journal, 34, 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horwitz, E. K. (1987). Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learning strategies in language learning (pp. 119–129). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1978). LISREL: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago: International Education Series.Google Scholar
Kolb, D. (1976). Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Aptitude and attitude in relation to second language acquisition and learning. In Diller, K. C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 140–153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Kruidenier, B. G., & Clément, R. (1986). The effect of context on the composition and role of orientations in second language acquisition. Quebec: International Centre for Research on Bilingualism.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukmani, Y. (1972). Motivation to learn and learning proficiency. Language Learning, 22, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1980). Theory and research in second language learning: An emerging paradigm. Language Learning, 30, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, B. (1990). The relationship between first and second languages: Language proficiency and language aptitude. In Harley, B., Allen, J., Cummins, J., & Swain, M. (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 158–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naiman, N., Fröhlich, M., Stern, H. H., & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learner (Research in Education Series, 7). Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.Google Scholar
Nation, R., & McLaughlin, B. (1986). Experts and novices: An information processing approach to the ‘good language learner’ problem. Applied Psycholinguistics, 7, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oiler, J. (1977). Attitude variables in second language learning. In Burt, M., Dulay, H., & Finochiarro, M. (Eds.), Viewpoints on English as a second language (pp. 172–184). New York: Regents.Google Scholar
Oiler, J. (1981). Research on the measurement of affective variables: Some remaining questions. In Andersen, R. W., (Ed.), New dimensions in second language acquisition research (pp. 14–27). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Oiler, J., Baca, L., & Vigil, F. (1977). Attitudes and attained proficiency in ESL: A sociolinguistic study of Mexican Americans in the Southwest. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oiler, J. W., Hudson, A. J., & Liu, P. F. (1977). Attitudes and attained proficiency in ESL: A sociolinguistic study of native speakers of Chinese in the United States. Language Learning, 27, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzares, G., Kupper, L, & Russo, R. P. (1985a). Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985b). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. (1989). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–227). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge, and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 589–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. (1983). Units of language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. R., & Al-Haik, A. (1976). The development of the Defense Language Aptitude Battery (DLAB). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pimsleur, P. (1966). The Pimsleur language aptitude battery. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Pimsleur, P., Sundland, D. M., & McIntyre, R. D. (1966). Underachievetnent in foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Politzer, R. L., & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviours and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramage, K. (1990). Motivational factors and persistence in foreign language study. Language Learning, 40, 189–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reves, T. (1983). What makes a good language learner? Unpublished doctoral dissertation; Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1980). Memory, language aptitude, and second language performance. Polyglot, 2, Fiche 3.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1982). Memory and motivation in language aptitude testing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation; University of London.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1986a). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In Cook, V. (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 81–94). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1986b). The role of foreign language aptitude in a model of school learning. language Testing, 3, 188–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1986c). Where does language aptitude come from? In Meara, P. (Ed.), Spoken language (pp. 95–113). London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1988). A Comparison of first and foreign language learning ability (Working Document No. 8). London: ESOL Department, Institute of Education, London University.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989a). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (1989b). The relationship between native and foreign language learning ability: Educational and linguistic factors. In Dechert, H. W. (Ed.), Current trends in European second language acquisition research (pp. 83–106). Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual matters.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (1989). Conditions for second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strong, M. H. (1984). Integrative motivation: Cause or result of successful second language acquisition? Language Learning, 34, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Wells, C. G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wells, C. G. (1986). Variation in child language. In Fletcher, P. & Garman, T. (Eds.), Language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 109–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M. B. (1981). Language aptitude measures in streaming, matching students with methods, and diagnosis of learning problems. In Diller, K. C. (Ed.), Individual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 119–139). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willing, K. (1987). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Adelaide: National Curriculum Resource Centre.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L., & Valadez, C. (1986). Teaching bilingual learners. In Wittrock, M. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 1–51). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar