Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T14:01:13.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Incipient creolization in Gastarbeiterdeutsch?: An experimental sociolinguistic study1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Carol W. Pfaff
Carol W. Pfaff
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From the point of view of linguists interested in pidginization, creolization, or other language contact phenomena, the continued presence of large numbers of southern European and North African foreign workers (called Gastaibeitei in Germany) and their families in northern European countries presents almost laboratory conditions for the investigation of the initial and subsequent stages of foreign language acquisition and development. Of particular interest is the fact that many of the languages involved here (Turkish, Arabic, Greek, Serbo-Croatian, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese) are typologically and genetically distinct; thus the situation is ideal for the study of common features of language development. If a Creole were to develop here, it would provide extremely valuable evidence for or against proposed universals.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1981 , pp. 165 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, C. N., and Maroldt, K.. 1977. The French lineage of English. Langues en contact— pidgins-creoles—languages in contact, ed. by Meisel, J., 21–53. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. 1977. Pidginization and creolization: language acquisition and language universals. In A. Valdman (ed.), 49–69.Google Scholar
Bodemann, Y. M., and Ostow, R.. 1975. Lingua franca und pseudo-pidgin in der Bundesrepublik: Fremdarbeiter und Einheimische im Sprachzusammenhang. In H. Kreuzer et al., 122–46.Google Scholar
Burt, M., Dulay, H., and Hernández-Chávez, E.. 1975. Bilingual syntax measure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1979. Psycholinguistic aspects of L2 acquisition: word order phenomena in foreign workers' interlanguage. Wuppertaler Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachwissenschaft 2.54–79.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1980. Variation in der friihkindlichen Sprachentwicklung. Paper presented at the 2nd annual meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, Feb. 27–29.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 1968. Zum Pidgin-Deutsch der Gastarbeiter. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 35.130–9.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N. 1979. Ordering adult learners according to language abilities. Paper presented at the Conference on Theoretical Orientations in Creole Studies,St. Thomas, Virgin Islands.March 28–April 1.Google Scholar
Dittmar, N., Haberland, H., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., and Teleman, N. (eds.). 1978. Papers from the first Scandinavian-German Symposium on the languages of immigrant workers and their children. Roskilde: Universitetscenter.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 1977. Implications of the jargon/pidgin dichotomy for social and linguistic analysis of the Gastarbeiter Pidgin German. Deutsch im Kontakt mit anderen Sprachen/German in contact with other languages, ed. by Molony, C., Zobl, H. and Stolting, W., 40–6. Kronberg, Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Gilbert, G., and Orlovié, M.. 1975. Pidgin-German spoken by foreign workers in West Germany. The definite article. Paper presented at the International Congress on Pidgins and Creoles, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. Jr., 1966. Pidgins and creole languages. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, I.F. 1977. Lexical expansion within a closed system. Sociocultural dimensions of language change, ed. by Blount, B. and Sanches, M., 161–71. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heidelberger Forschungsprojekt: Pidgin Deutsch. 1975. Sprache und Kommunikation ausländischer Arbeiter. Kronberg, Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Heidelberger Forschungsprojekt: Pidgin Deutsch. 1978. The unguided learning of German by Spanish and Italian workers. A sociolinguistic study. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Kreuzer, H., Klein, W., Gunzenhäuser, R., and Haubrichs, W. (eds.) 1975. Sprache auslandischer Arbeiter. Zeitschrift fur Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 18.Google Scholar
Kunsmann, P., Mühlhäuser, P., Pfaff, C., and Portz, R.. 1979. Bilinguale Erziehung am Beispiel der J. F. Kennedy-Schule (Berlin). Arbeitspapiere zur Linguistik/Working Papers in Linguistics 6.52–83.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. 1975. Ausländerdeutsch und Deutsch ausländischer Arbeiter: Zur möglichen Entstehung eines Pidgin in der BRD. In Kreuzer et al. (eds.), 9–53.Google Scholar
Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., and Pienemann, M.. 1979. On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Wuppertaler Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachwissenschaft 2.1–53.Google Scholar
Meyer-Ingwersen, J., Neumann, R., and Kummer, M.. 1977. Zur Sprachentwicklung tür-kischer Schiller in der Bundesrepublik, Vol. I and II. Kronberg, Ts.: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W. 1975. The process of decreolization in Black English. Paper presented at the International Conference on Pidgins and Creoles,Honolulu, Hawaii. Revised version to appear in Papers in pidgin and Creole linguistics, ed. by Day, R.. Varieties of English around the world. Heidelberg: Julius Gross.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., and Portz, R.. 1979. Foreign children's acquisition of German: universals vs. interference. Paper presented at Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Pfaff, C. W., and Portz, R.. 1980. Deutschspracherwerb auslandischer Arbeiterkinder: Universalien vs. Interferenzen. Paper presented at 2nd annual meeting of the Deutsch Gesellschaft für Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1978. Uberlegung zur Steuerung des Zweitspracherwerbs ausländischer Arbeiterkinder. Wuppertaler Arbeitspapiere zur Sprachwissenschaft 1.38–61.Google Scholar
Portz, R., and Pfaff, C. W.. 1980. Entwicklung und Erprobung des Soziolinguistischen Sprachentwicklungstests (SSET), ein Instrument zur Beschreibung der Sprach-und Kommunikations-fähigkeit auslandischer Schüler in deutschen Schulen. Berlin: Pädagogisches Zentrum.Google Scholar
Schumann, J. 1978. The pidginization process: a model for second language acquisition. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 1978. Semilingualism and the education of migrant children as a means of reproducing the caste of assembly line workers. In Dittmar et al. (eds.), 221–51.Google Scholar
Stölting, W. 1978. Teaching German to immigrant children. In Dittmar et al. (eds.), 99–110.Google Scholar
Stölting, W., Delié, Dragica, Orlovié, Marija, Rausch, Karin, and Sausner, Edeltraud. 1978. Die Zweisprachigkeit jugoslavischer Schiiler in der Bundesrepublik. Fachbereich II. Lehrgebiet Deutsch als Frendsprache, Universität Oldenburg.Google Scholar
Valdman, A. (ed.). 1977. Pidgin and Creole linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar