Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T02:15:37.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE GRAMMATICAL BASIS OF LINGUISTIC PERFORMANCE: LANGUAGE USE AND ACQUISITION. Robert C. Berwick & Amy S. Weinberg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986. Pp. xviii + 325. $9.95.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Lydia White
Lydia White
Affiliation:
McGill University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , October 1987 , pp. 369 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bresnan, J. (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1981). Unbounded dependencies and coordinate structures. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 155–184.Google Scholar
Marcus, M. (1980). A theory of syntactic recognition for natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sharwood, Smith M. (in press). The competence/control model applied to cross-linguistic influence in the creation of new grammars. In Kellerman, E. & Smith, M. Sharwood (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Zobl, H. (1986). A functional approach to the attainability of typological targets in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research, 2, 16–32.Google Scholar