Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:47:32.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the (in)applicability of Piagetian thought to language learning*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2008

Sascha W. Felix
Sascha W. Felix
Affiliation:
University of Passau
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent years research on language acquisition (both L1 and L2) has gradually turned away from the domain of pure description towards dealing with problems of explanation. Most students of language development feel that it is somewhat insufficient to merely state the linguistic regularities and verbal strategies that according to the available production data appear to govern processes of language learning; rather, it seems desirable that the regularities observable in the learner's verbal behavior over time be in some way explained. Frequently, the term explanation is—implicitly rather than explicitly—understood as an attempt to reduce the specific linguistic regularities found in language learning processes to a set of some more general (i.e. non-linguistic) principles that will not only control other learning tasks as well, but will also govern man's mental activities as such (Slobin 1973, Schlesinger 1977, Larsen-Freeman 1976, Bever 1970, Wong-Fillmore 1976). Among those mental domains which appear to provide principles general enough to be applicable to problems of language, learning cognition or rather cognitive development turned out to be the most promising. As a consequence, a large number of studies focused on the attempt to explain formal linguistic properties of language learning processes in terms of more general regularities in man's cognitive abilities as they develop (Seliger 1980, Gass 1980, Felix 1976, Sinclair-de-Zwart 1973, Meisel 1979, Clahsen 1979). In fact, the term explanation frequently means little more than reducing language acquisition to aspects of cognitive development.

Type
Articles
Information
Studies in Second Language Acquisition , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , Spring 1981 , pp. 179 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bever, T. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Hayes, 279–362.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. 1970. Language development: form and function in emerging grammars. Cambridge, MA.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Bower, T. 1974. Development in infancy. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Bowerrnan, M. 1973. Early syntactic development: a cross-linguistic study with special reference to Finnish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. Afirst language: the early stages. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, M., and Dulay, H.. 1980. On acquisition orders. In Felix, 1980a. 265–327.Google Scholar
Butterworth, G. 1972. A Spanish-speaking adolescent's acquisition of English syntax. UCLA M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1975. Reflections on language. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. 1979. Syntax oder Produktionsstrategien? Zum natürlichen Zweitspracherwerb der ‘Gastarbeiter.’ in Kloepfer et al., 343–54.Google Scholar
Dulay, H., and Burt, M.. 1974a. Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24.37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., and Burt, M.. 1974b. A new perspective on the creative construction process in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24.37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, H., and Burt, M.. 1974b. A new perspective on the creative construction process in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24.253–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felix, S. 1976. Wh-pronouns in first and second language acquisition. Linguistische Berichte 44.52–64.Google Scholar
Felix, S. 1978. Linguistische Untersuchungen zum natürlichen Zweitsprachenerwerb. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (ed.). 1980a. Second language development. Trends and issues. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (ed.). 1980b. Cognition and language development: a German child's acquisition of question words.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (ed.). 1980c. Kreative Kompetenz im Zweitsprachenerwerb. Königstein: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (ed.). (In prep.). Competing cognitive structures in language acquisition.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C., and Slobin, D. (eds.). 1973. Studies of child language development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. 1963. The developmental psychology of fean Piaget. Princeton, N. J.: Van Nostrand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J., Bever, T., and Garrett, M.. 1974. The psychology of language: an introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gass, S. 1980. L2 data: Its relevance for language universals. Paper presented at the TESOL Convention, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hatch, E. (ed.). 1978. Second language acquisition. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Hayes, J. (ed.). 1970. Cognition and the development of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Huang, J. 1971. A Chinese child's acquisition of English syntax. UCLA M.A. Thesis.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. 1974a. Phonological rules in young children. Journal of Child Language 1.49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, D. 1974b. Fronting in child phonology. Journal of Child Language 1.233–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhelder, B., and Chipman, H. (eds.). 1976. Piaget and his school: a reader in developmental psychology. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klima, E., and Bellugi, U.. 1966. Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Lyons and Wales, 183–208.Google Scholar
Kloepfer, R. et al. , (eds.). 1979. Bildung und Ausbildung in der Romania 2. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D. 1976. An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning 26.125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A., Harris, K., Hoffman, H., and Griffith, B., 1957. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. Journal of Experimental Psychology 53.358–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A., Harris, K., Hoffman, H., and Griffith, B., Eimas, P., Lisker, L., and Bastian, J.. 1961. An effect of learning on speech perception: the discrimination of durations of silence with and without phonemic significance. Language and Speech 4.1975–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A., Harris, K., Hoffman, H., and Griffith, B., Eimas, P., Lisker, L., and Bastian, J., Cooper, F., Shankweiler, D., and Studdert-Kennedy, M.. 1967. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 74.431–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyons, J., and Wales, R.. 1966. Psycholinguistic papers. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. 1979. Strategies of second language acquisition: more than one kind of simplification. Paper presented at the Symposium on the Relationship Between Pidginization, Creolization and Language Acquisition, Linguistic Society of America, Annual Meeting '79, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Milon, J. 1974. The development of negation in English by a second language learner. TESOL Quarterly 8.137–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T. (ed.). 1973. Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oerter, R. 1977. Modern Entwicklungpsychologie. Donauwörth: Aver.Google Scholar
Olmsted, D. 1971. Out of the mouth of babes. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1962. The stages of the intellectual development of the child. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 26.120–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Piaget, J. 1947. La psychologic de l'intelligence. Paris: Droz.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. 1975. L'équilibration des structures cognitives. Problème central du développement. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1976a. Le langage et la pensée chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel, Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1976b. Biology and cognition. In Inhelder and Chipman, 45–62.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1979. Der Zweitspracherwerb auslandischer Arbeiterkinder. Wuppertal University Dissertation.Google Scholar
Pienemann, M. 1980. The second language acquisition of immigrant children. In Felix, 1980a, 41–56.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J. 1977. The role of cognitive development and input in language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 4.153–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumann, J. 1975. Second language acquisition: The pidginization hypothesis. Harvard University Dissertation.Google Scholar
Seliger, H. 1980. First and second language acquisition: The question of developmental strategies. Paper presented at the 3rd Language Research Forum UCLA.Google Scholar
Sinclair-de-Zwart, H. 1973. Language acquisition and cognitive development. In Moore, 9–26.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Ferguson and Slobin, 175–208.Google Scholar
Smith, N. 1973. The acquisition of phonology: a case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wode, H. 1976a. Some stages in the acquisition of questions by monolingual children. Word 27.261–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wode, H. 1976b. Developmental sequences in naturalistic L2 acquisition. Working Papers on Bilingualism 11.1–31.Google Scholar
Wode, H. 1978. Free vs. bound forms in three types of language acquisition. ISB-Utrecht 3.6–22.Google Scholar
Wode, H. 1980. Learning a second language. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wong-Fillmore, L. 1976. The second time around. Stanford University Dissertation.Google Scholar
ZISA (research group Zweitspracherwerb italienischer und spanischer Arbeiter), in print, Deutsch als Zweitsprache. Der Spracherwerb auslandischer Arbeiter. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar