Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T00:46:45.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discipline and Diversity in the Medieval English Sunday*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Diana Wood
Diana Wood*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The medieval Church had strict disciplinary rules about how Sunday should be observed, but in England there was considerable diversity in interpreting and honouring them. The medieval English Sunday is a vast and challenging subject, yet despite this, and the controversy excited by the Sunday Trading Act of 1994 which allowed shops to open, it has excited little recent attention.

The discipline of Sunday was laid down in the Third Commandment (Exod. 20: 8–11), where Christians were ordered to keep holy the Sabbath day and told ‘In it thou shalt not do any work.’ This was reinforced in canon law, in episcopal mandates, in commentaries, in theological treatises, in sermons, in pastoralia, and in popular literature. The Sunday Christ, the image of Christ surrounded by craftsmen’s tools, which enshrined the idea that Sunday working with such implements crucified him anew, adorned the walls of many late medieval English parish churches. Secular rulers, starting with Wihtred of Kent (695), included Sabbath-keeping in their legislation. Diversity occurred in the varying interpretations of the law on Sunday observance, and in the patchiness of its enforcement. The questions to be addressed here are, firstly, what actually constituted Sunday? Secondly, what were people supposed to do on Sundays, and did they do it? Finally, how well observed was the work prohibition as applied to Sunday trading?

Type
Research Article
Information
Studies in Church History , Volume 43: Discipline and Diversity , 2007 , pp. 202 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

My thanks are due to Robert Swanson for his helpful suggestions.

References

1 Most useful is Parker, Kenneth, The English Sabbath: a Study of Doctrine and Discipline from the Reformation to the Civil War (Cambridge, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, ch. 1. In general see Levy, Max, Der Sabbath in England: Wesen und Entwicklung des englischen Sonntags (Leipzig, 1933)Google Scholar; Thurston, H., ‘The Medieval Sunday’, The Nineteenth Century 46 (1899), 36–50 Google Scholar; Rodgers, Edith Cooperrider, Discussion of Holidays in the Later Middle Ages (New York, 1940; repr. 1967)Google Scholar; Cheney, C. R., ‘Rules for the Observance of Feast Days in Medieval England’, BIHR 34 (1961), 117–24 Google Scholar; Harvey, Barbara, ‘Work and festa ferianda in Medieval England’, JEH 23 (1972), 289–308 Google Scholar; Jenks, Susanne, ‘Bill Litigation and the Observance of Sundays and Major Festivals in the Court of King’s Bench in the Fifteenth Century’, Law and History Review 22 (2004), 619–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 See Reiss, Athene, The Sunday Christ: Sabbatarianism in English Medieval Wall Painting, British Archaeological Report, British series, 292 (Oxford, 2000).Google Scholar

3 The Laws of Wihtred, King of Kent (695), EHD 1, 363, no. 31, cl. 9–11. For further Anglo-Saxon examples see Levy, Der Sabbath, ch. 4.

4 Dives and Pauper, ed. Barnum, Priscilla Heath, EETS 275 (Oxford, 1976)Google Scholar, Commandment III, iii, 270, lines 47–9.

5 Ibid., lines 49–57.

6 Ibid., III, ii, 265, lines 4.-8.

7 Ibid., 266, lines 12–22.

8 Gratian, Decretum, D.3 c. 1. (CIC 1: 1353).

9 Thurston, , ‘Medieval Sunday’, 39.Google Scholar

10 Thomas of Chobham, Summa confessorum, D.3, q.1a, ed. Broomfield, F., Analecta mediaevalia Namurcensia 25 (Louvain and Paris, 1968), 267.Google Scholar

11 Brunne, Robert Mannyng of, Handlyng Synne, ed. Furnivall, F.J., EETS os 119 (London, 1901), 31–2 Google Scholar, lines 846–76.

12 Lyndwood, William, Provinciale (Oxford, 1679), 102 Google Scholar, s.v. ‘vespertina’.

13 Dives and Pauper, III, xiv, 287, lines 7–12.

14 H. T. Riley, ed., Liber custumarum, RS 12, 3 vols in 4 (1859–62), 2.1: 78.

15 4 Henry IV, cl. 14, ed. A. Luders et al., Statutes of the Realm, 11 vols (London, 1810–28), 2: 137.

16 Tawney, R. H. and Power, Eileen, eds, Tudor Economic Documents 1 (London, 1924), 97.Google Scholar

17 D.3 C.16.(CICI: 1356–7).

18 Langland, William, The Vision of William concerning Piers the Plowman, ed. Skeat, Walter W., 2 vols (Oxford, 1924; repr. 1969)Google Scholar, CIO, 240, lines 227–9.

19 Powicke, F. M. and Cheney, C. R., eds, Councils and Synods, AD 1205–1313, 2 vols in 4 (Oxford, 1964), 2. 1 Google Scholar: 1021, cl. 22.

20 Ibid., 1097.

21 Ibid., 1117, cl. 4.

22 Wilkins, D., Concilia Magnae Brilanniae et Hiberniae, 4 vols (London, 1737), 2: 43.Google Scholar

23 Wunderli, Richard M., London Church Courts and Society on the Eve of the Reformation (Cambridge, MA, 1981), 123.Google Scholar

24 Wood-Legh, K. L., ed., Kentish Visitations of Archbishop Warham and his Deputies, 1511 –12, Archaeologia Cantiana 24(1984), 143–4.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., nos 18b, 52d, 108c, 174n, 1740, 204d. For those threatened, see nos 68a, 138a.

26 E. Elvey, ed., The Courts of the Archdeaconry of Buckingham, 1483–1523, Buckinghamshire Record Society 19 (1975), 76, no. 103, 107, no. 153, 175, no. 247.

27 Ibid., 124, no. 178. On ritual penance see Dave Postles, ‘Penance and the Market Place: a Reformation Dialogue with the Medieval Church (c.1250-c.1600),’ JEH 54 (2003), 441–68.

28 John Bromyard, Summa Praedicantium (Venice, 1586), cap. 3, s.v. ‘feriarum’, fol. 279V, §11.

29 Dives and Pauper, III, vi, 275, lines 33–5.

30 Powicke and Cheney, Councils and Synods, 2.1:31, cl. 35.

31 Bannister, A. T., ed., ‘Visitation Returns of the Diocese of Hereford in 1397, II’, EHR 44(1929), 444–64, at 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

32 Thompson, A. Hamilton, ed., Visitations in the Diocese of Lincoln, 1517–1531, Lincoln Record Society 35 (1944), 56; 33 (1940), 24.Google Scholar

33 Poos, L. R., ed., Lower Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction in Late Medieval England: the Courts of the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln, 1336–1349, and the Deanery of Wisbech, 1458–1484 (Oxford, 2001)Google Scholar: Thomas Bluwyk of Wisbech, 282; John Sawer of Wisbech, 304; Simon Lambhard and John Raynold of Emneth, 405, John Reynold of Birdes [sic] of Leverington, 551.

34 Ibid., 316.

35 Ibid., 541.

36 Ibid., 536.

37 Wood-Legh, Kentish Visitations, no. 174m.

38 Ibid., 222 (5).

39 Dives and Pauper, III, vii, 277, lines 35–7.

40 Wilkins, , Concilia, 2: 43.Google Scholar

41 Ibid., 3: 266.

42 Dives and Pauper, III, vi, 275, lines 31–3.

43 Attenborough, F. L., ed., The Laws of the Earliest English Kings (Cambridge, 1922), 107 Google Scholar, cl.7.

44 Hovedon, Roger of, Chronica, ed. Stubbs, W., RS 51, pt 4 (London, 1871), 168–9 Google Scholar. On Eustace’s mission see Cate, J. L., ‘The English Mission of Eustace of Flay (1200–1201)’, in Études d’histoire dédiées à la mémoire de Henri Pirenne (Brussels, 1937), 67–89 Google Scholar, and on the letter, Jones, W. R., ‘The Heavenly Letter in Medieval England’, Medievalia et Humanistica, ns 6 (1975), 163–75.Google Scholar

45 Roger of Hovedon, Chronica, 172.

46 Cate, James Lea, The Church and Market Reform in England during the Reign of Henry III’, in Cate, James Lea and Anderson, E. N., eds, Medieval and Historiographical Essays in Honor of James Westfall Thompson (Chicago, IL, 1938), 27–65.Google Scholar

47 Powicke and Cheney, Councils and Synods, 2.1: 35, cl. 58.

48 Ibid., 2.1: William of Blois of Worcester, 174, cl. 22; an unknown bishop, 194, cl. 83; Walter Cantilupe of Worcester, 297, cl. 83; William Raleigh of Winchester, 410, cl. 46; Richard de Wich of Chichester, 461, cl. 5; Fulk Basset of London, 647, cl. 64; Nicholas of Farnham of Durham, 432, cl. 42; 2. Ibid., 2.2: Peter Quivel of Exeter, 1021, cl. 22.

49 X 2.9.1.(CIC 2:270)

50 Centre for Metropolitan History, Gazetteer of Markets and Fairs in England and Wales to 1516 (available at: www.history.ac.uk/cmh/gazweb2.html, accessed 2003).

51 Bromyard, Summa, fol. 279v, § 10.

52 Wilkins, Concilia, 2: 68.

53 Ibid., 73.

54 Registrum Hamonis Hethe, diocesis Roffensis, AD 1319–52, ed. Johnson, C., CYS 49 (1948), 117.Google Scholar

55 27 Henry VI, cl. 5, Statutes of the Realm 2: 351–2.

56 Raine, J., ed., Depositions and Other Ecclesiastical Proceedings from the Courts of Durham, Surtees Society 21 (1845), 35 Google Scholar; Bannister, , ‘Visitation Returns of the Diocese of Hereford, III’, EHR 45 (1930), 92–101, at 92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Visitation Returns of the Diocese of Hereford, IV, ibid., 444–63, at 452; Elvey, , Buckingham, 30, no. 32 Google Scholar; Poos, Lower Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, 327, 331, 333, 339, 411, 417.

57 Wood-Legh, Kentish Visitations, nos 102b, 102c.

58 Ibid., nos 18a, 64a, 323b.

59 Poos, , Lower Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, 394.Google Scholar

60 Hamilton-Thompson, , Diocese of Lincoln, 1, 81 Google Scholar; Poos, , Lower Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction, 270, 333.Google Scholar

61 Timmins, T.C.B.. ed, The Register of John Waltham, Bishop of Salisbury, 1388–95, CYS 80 (1994), nos 926, 927, 930 942.Google Scholar

62 Elvey, Buckingham, 3P, 7.

63 Powicke and Cheney, Councils and Synods, 2.1: 461, cl. 5 (Chichester); 647, cl. 64 (London); 2.2: 1021, ch. 22 (Exeter).

64 Wilkins, , Concilia, 3: 266–7.Google Scholar

65 Francis, A., ed., Visitations and Memorials of Southwell Minster, Camden Society, ns 48 (1891). 53.Google Scholar

66 Dives and Pauper, III, xv, 289–90, lines 14–16.

67 Ibid., xvi, 291, lines 24–34.

68 Ibid., 292, lines 41–51.

69 Wood, Diana, Medieval Economic Thought (Cambridge, 2002), 115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar