No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Unity, Uniformity and Diversity: the Anglican Liturgy in England and the United States, 1900-1940
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
‘Uniformity’, declared Sir John Nicholl, one of the greatest of Anglican ecclesiastical lawyers, ‘is one of the leading and distinguishing principles of the Church of England - nothing is left to the discretion and fancy of the individual.’ At the Reformation the English Church was distinguished not by the decisions of councils, confessional statements, or the writings of particular leaders, but by one uniform liturgy. This liturgy, ‘containing nothing contrary to the Word of God, or to sound Doctrine’ and consonant with the practice of the early Church, was intended to ‘preserve Peace and Unity in the Church’ and to edify the people. It was also opposed to the ‘great diversity in saying and singing in Churches within this Realm’ and, abolishing the liturgical uses of Salisbury, Hereford, Bangor, York, and Lincoln, it established that ‘now from henceforth all the whole Realm shall have but one Use’. This principle of liturgical uniformity was enshrined in the several Acts of Uniformity from that of the second year of King Edward VI to that of the fourteenth year of Charles II, amended, but not abolished, in the reign of Queen Victoria. It was a principle conveyed to the churches in the colonies so that, even if they revised or abandoned the Book of Common Prayer in use in England, as the Americans did in 1789, what was substituted was called ‘The Book of Common Prayer and declared to be ‘the Liturgy of this Church’ to be ‘received as such by all members of the same’. The principle of uniformity was modified during the Anglican Communion’s missionary expansion. The Lambeth Conference of 1920 considered that liturgical uniformity throughout the Churches of the Anglican Communion was not a necessity, but the 1930 Conference held that the Book of Common Prayer, as authorized in the several Churches of the Communion, was the place where faith and order were set forth, and so implied a degree of uniformity maintained by the use of a single book.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1996
References
1 Newbury v. Goodwin (1811), I Phillimore 282; quoted by Addleshaw, G. W. O., The High Churrh Tradition (London, 1949), p. 23.Google Scholar
2 Hatched, M.J., ‘Prayer Books’, in Sykes, S. and Booty, J., eds. The Study of Anglicanism (London, 1988), p. 121.Google Scholar
3 The Preface to the Book of Common Prayer, 1662.
4 Ibid., ‘Concerning the Service of the Church’.
5 2 & 3 Edw. 6, c. 1.
6 14 Car. 2, c. 4.
7 Act of Uniformity Amendment Act, 1872 (35 & 36 Vict. c. 35).
8 ‘The Ratification of the Book of Common Prayer by the Bishops, Clergy, and the Laity of the Protestant Episcopal Church in the United States of America’, 16 October, 1789. Printed in the Prayer Book.
9 Resolution 36; text in The Lambeth Conferences (1867-1948) (London, 1948), p. 45.
10 Resolution 49; text in The Lambeth Conferences, p. 173.
11 Suter, J. W. and Addison, C. M., The People’s Book of Worship (New York, 1919), p. 28.Google Scholar
12 Lacey, T. A., Liturgical Interpolations, 3rd ed. (London, 1912), p. 1 Google Scholar. The tract, which first appeared in 1898 and was reprinted in 1903, appeared in its third edition as the first of the Alcuin Club’s Prayer Book Revision Pamphlets.
13 As in the Club’s first tract. The Ornaments of the Rubric, by J. T. Micklethwaite (London, 1897). The Club’s aims and objectives are set out on the end-pages.
14 The Prayer Book Measure: Speeches delivered by the Archbishops of Canterbury and York to the Convocations at the Church House, Westminster, Monday, February 7th, 1927 (London, 1927), p. 29.
15 Bell, G. K. A., Randall Davidson (London, 1938), p. 462.Google Scholar
16 Ibid., p. 462.
17 Ibid., p. 463.
18 Ibid., p. 471. Report of the Royal Commission on Ecclesiastical Discipline (London, 1906), § 399.
19 Ibid.
20 Gray, Donald, Earth and Altar, Alcuin Club Collections, 68 (Norwich, 1986), pp. 35–62.Google Scholar
21 The Prayer Book Measure, p. 18.
22 The Spectator, 21 May 1927; reprinted as a pamphlet, Unity without Uniformity (London, 1927).
23 London, 1928.
24 The Prayer Book: Our Hope and Meaning, p. 39.
25 Ibid., p. 13.
26 Schmidt, Robert F., Prayer Book Revision in the Church of England, 1906-1929: Liturgy, Doctrine, and Ecclesiastical Discipline (Ann Arbor, 1984), p. 309.Google Scholar
27 The Times, 29 September 1928. p. 10; Schmidt, Prayer Book Revision, p. 311.
28 Chronicle of Convocation, 1929, 131; Schmidt, Prayer Book Revision, p. 315.
29 8 October 1929.
30 Albright, R. W., A History of the Protestant Episcopal Church (New York, 1964), pp. 295–7 Google Scholar. Credit is also given to H. B. St George of Nashotah House by E. R. Hardy, Jr, ‘The Catholic Revival in the American Church, 1722-1933’, in N. P. Williams and C. Harris, Northern Catholicism (London, 1933), p. 113.
31 Journal of the General Convention of 1928 (New York, 1928), p. 107.
32 Ibid., p. 148.
33 Ibid., p. 149.
34 Slattery, C. L., The New Prayer Book: An Introduction (New York, nd but presumably 1928 or 1929), p. 37.Google Scholar
35 Ibid., p. 37.
36 Ibid., p. 39.
37 Dalby, J. M. M., ‘Anglican Missals’. CQR, 168 (1967), p. 212 Google Scholar. Ritual Notes first appeared in 1886 and The Parson’s Handbook, compiled by Percy Dearmer, in 1899. Both were regularly revised. The last editions appeared in 1964 and 1965 respectively.
38 Kemp, E. W., ed., Beauty and Bands (London, 1955), p. 60.Google Scholar
39 Letter of 30 March 1929 in Waiter Howard Frere: His Correspondence on Liturgical Reuision and Construction, ed. R. C. D. Jasper, Alcuin Club Collections, 39 (London, 1954), p. 182.
40 Alcuin Club Tracts XIII, A Directory of Ceremonial, Part 1, 3rd edn (London, 1931).
41 Lowther Clarke, W. K., ed., Liturgy and Worship (London, 1932), p. 2.Google Scholar
42 Lowther Clarke, W. K., The Prayer Book of 1928 Reconsidered (London, 1943), p. 1.Google Scholar
43 Boone Porter, H., ‘Toward an unofficial history of episcopal worship’, in Burson, Malcolm C., ed., Worship Points the Way: A Celebration of the Life and Work of Massey Hamilton Shepherd, Jr. (New York, 1981), p. 107.Google Scholar
44 Journal of the General Convention of 1940 (New York, 1940), p. 472.
45 Shepherd, Massey Hamilton Jr, ‘The history of the liturgical renewal’, in Shepherd, M. H., ed., The Liturgical Renewal of the Church (New York, 1960), p. 48.Google Scholar
46 See W. Taylor Stevenson, ‘Lex Orandi-Lex Credendi’, in Sykes and Booty, Study of Anglicanism, pp. 174-88.