No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some Aspects of Religion and Spiritual Healing in Cultsville, a Contemporary North American City
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
In many ways modern society resembles a large stone in an overgrown garden. The stone stands apart from the weeds. Its outline is clear and its surface smooth and clean. But if we turn the stone we find another world. This is a realm of slime with a host of creepy crawlies scrurrying to escape the light. Attempting to penetrate beyond the official rational scientific culture of modern society which, like the top-side of the stone, is visible to all, is similar to the act of turning the stone to expose its repulsive underside. Beneath the ordered exterior of our official culture is a disorderly and, to the rational mind, shocking vision of reality.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 1982
References
1 Cf.Roszak, Theodore, Unfinished Animal (London 1967)Google Scholar. Tiryakian, Edward A. ed. On the Margin of the Visible: Sociology, the Esoteric, and the Occult (London 1974).Google Scholar
2 Cf.Popenoe, Cris, ed., Wellness (New York 1977).Google Scholar
3 Gallup, George Jr. ed. Religion in America 1979-1980 (Princeton 1980) pp 34–36, 65.Google Scholar
4 Ibid p 83.
5 [Wuthnow, Robert], The Consciousness Reformation (Berkely 1976) pp 30–42.Google Scholar
6 Bird, Fredrick & Reimer, William, ‘Participation Rates in New Religious and Para-Religious Movements’ (Unpublished research paper, Concordia University, Montreal 1981).Google Scholar
7 Harrell, David Edwin, All Things Are Possible: The Healing and Charismatic Revivals in Modern America (Indiana 1976).Google Scholar
8 Fr.MacNutt, Francis, Healing (Notre Dame, Indiana 1974).Google Scholar
9 Judah, J. Stillson, The History atta Philosophy of the Melaphyscial Movements in America (Philadelphia 1967).Google Scholar
10 Bauman, E., Brint, A. I., Piper, L., & Wright, P. A. eds. The Holistic Health Handbook (Berkeley 1978).Google Scholar
11 Inglis, Brian, Natural Medicine (London 1979).Google Scholar
12 William G. McLoghlin, Revivals, Awakenings and Reform.
13 Rifkin, Jeremy & Howard, Ted, The Emerging Order (New York 1979).Google Scholar
14 The Consciousness Reformation pp 82-135.
15 In working on the new religious movements in North America I have found that most of the small non-western groups are prepared to accept criticism provided one recognises their right to exist. On the other hand fundamentalist and evangelical Christian groups are very sensitive to any form of analysis which does not fit their theological paradigm. Recently I wrote a paper examining the beliefs and life-style of a well known evangelical organisation. Unfortunately I named the group concerned in my paper. While the group’s leaders were positive towards my criticisms and prepared to take my argument.seriously, I received a number of letters from evangelicals which ranged from threats of libel action to open abuse. The paper was circulated at an academic conference. How some of the people who wrote to me obtained it I just don’t know. However it has taught me to be very cautious in writing about evangelical religion. The evidence discussed in this paper is far more emotional than my earlier study hence my need to preserve the anonymity of the groups.
16 [Douglas, Mary,] Naturai Symbols (London 1970).Google Scholar
17 Douglas, Mary, Implicit Meanings (London 1975).Google Scholar
18 Douglas, Mary and Isherwood, B. C., The World of Goods (London 1980).Google Scholar
19 Douglas, Mary, Cultural Bias (London 1979).Google Scholar
20 Natural Symbols p 57.
21 The names given to these organisations as far as possible reflect their self-understanding of themselves but are not identifiable with their real names.
22 Simak, Clifford D., Way Station (New York 1963).Google Scholar