No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Paternalism and Roman Catholicism: The English Catholic Elite in the Long Eighteenth Century*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 March 2016
Extract
There is a general acceptance amongst historians of English Catholicism in the Early Modern period that Catholic landlords were paternalistic towards their tenants, that they were generally in turns charitable and controing, their behaviour invasive yet motivated by a desire for religious and social harmony within the manor. Early modern English Catholicism was certainly seigneurial, with a requirement by the landlord, as suggested by John Bossy, to pay attention to the tenants’ well-being and ‘also to their faith and morals’.’ Michael Mullett echoes these sentiments with regard to late eighteenth-century Catholics who relied ‘on the kind hearts of those who wore the coronets’. The idea of Catholic paternalism is also endorsed by several social and economic historians, such as James M. Rosenheim, who wrote with regard to Lancashire, ‘[the] Roman Catholic gentry sustained closer connections with local communities than did aristocrats elsewhere’. This paper will examine the issue of paternalism on Catholic estates and in the local community to show that the Catholic elite, like their non-Catholic counterparts, gave money to the poor and established schools and almshouses. The focus of this philanthropy, however, was on other Catholics. The Catholic elite were also able to help their tenants, who were usually Catholic, and tie them more closely to the estate by not rack-renting their property and by not hiding behind estate stewards. There were two main reasons for the Catholic elite to focus their efforts on their poorer brethren: without the help of the Catholic elite in providing chapels and relief, Catholicism in England would have floundered; the Catholic elite were also
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Ecclesiastical History Society 2006
Footnotes
*
I wish to thank the Economic and Social Research Council for providing funding for this project.
References
1 Bossy, John, The English Catholic Community, 1570–1850 (London, 1975), 174–5.Google Scholar
2 Mullett, Michael A., Catholics in Britain and Ireland, 1558–1829 (Basingstoke, 1998), 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Rosenheim, James M., The Emergence of a Ruling Order. English Landed Society 1650–1750 (London, 1998), 203.Google Scholar
4 Roberts, David, Paternalism in Early Victorian England (London, 1979), 4–5.Google Scholar
5 Mingay, G. E., English Landed Society in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1963), 208, 275, 284 Google Scholar; Lawes, Kim, Paternalism and Politics: the Revival of Paternalism in Early Nineteenth-Century Britain (Basingstoke, 2000), 12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Langford, Paul, ed., The Eighteenth Century 1688–181 5 (Oxford, 2002), 151–2, 186 Google Scholar; Jacob, W. M., Lay People and Religion in the Early Eighteenth Century (Cambridge, 1996), ch. 6, 155–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Hainsworth, D. R., Stewards, Lords and People (Cambridge, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mingay, , English Landed Society, 189–201 Google Scholar; idem, , ed., The Cambridge Agrarian History of England and Wales. Vol. 6: 1750–1850 (Cambridge, 1989), 565.Google Scholar
7 Hainsworth, Stewards, 48–52.
8 Lancashire Record Office [hereafter: LRO], DDBL/54/42, Tenants’ Book, 2.
9 [Tempest, Stephen], Religio Laici: or a Layman’s Thoughts Upon his Duty to God, his Neighbour and Himself (2nd edn, London, 1768), 42.Google Scholar
10 Constable of Everingham Estate Correspondence, 1725–43, ed. Peter Roebuck, Yorkshire Archaeological Society Record Series 136 (York, 1974); idem, ‘Absentee Landownership in the Late Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Centuries: a Neglected Factor in English Agrarian History’, Agricultural History Review 21 (1973), 1–17, 5.
11 Jacobite activity might force some members of the Catholic elite to flee abroad during periods of instability but this affected a very small minority. For other reasons for absenteeism in general, see Roebuck, ‘Absentee Landownership’, 11–14.
12 Jordan, Sally, ‘Catholic Identity, Ideology and Culture: the Thames Valley Catholic Gentry from the Restoration to the Relief Acts’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Reading, 2003, 200–1.Google Scholar
13 LRO, DDBL/54/42, 7.
14 Innes, Joanna, ‘The “Mixed Economy of Welfare” in Early Modern England: Assessments of the Options from Hale to Malthus (c.1683-1803)’, in Daunton, Martin, ed., Charity, Self-Interest and Welfare in the English Past (London, 1996), 139–80, 145 Google Scholar; Slack, Paul, The English Poor Law, 1531–1782 (Cambridge, 1995), 20, 37.Google Scholar
15 The Speculum of Archbishop Thomas Seeker, ed. Jeremy Gregory, Church of England Record Society 2 (Woodbridge, 1995), 36.
16 Holt, T. G., ‘Long Melford and the Martin Family’, London Recusant 8 (1978), 2–8, 3.Google Scholar
17 Foster, Stewart, ‘The Ginge Petre Charity Almshouses, Ingatestone’, Essex Recusant 24 (1982), 59–63, 59.Google Scholar
18 Lascelles, Lillian and Guise-Berrow, Elizabeth, ‘Churchwardens’ Presentments 1644–1768’, Worcestershire Recusant 6 (1965), 21–45, 44.Google Scholar
19 Mingay, , Agrarian History, 198–230 Google Scholar; many landlords were converting leases to rack rents in the eighteenth century though this varied from county to county; see Turner, M. E., Beckett, J. V. and Afton, B., Agricultural Rent in England, 1690–1914 (Cambridge, 1997), 26–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20 Dorset Record Office [hereafter: DRO], D/WLC/M82; Returns of Papists 1767, ed. E. S. Worrall, Catholic Record Society Occasional Publication, 2 vols (London, 1989), 2: 169–70.
21 Bossy, John, ‘More Northumbrian Congregations’, Recusant History 10 (1969), 11–34, 12–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 LRO, DDBL/54/42, 9. For religion of tenants, LRO, QDP/1/1-8 (papists’ estates).
23 LRO, DDBL/54/42, 133, 216–17; Turner, Beckett and Afton, Agricultural Rent, 314–15.
24 Gritt, Andrew, ‘Aspects of Agrarian Change in South-West Lancashire, c.1650-1850’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Central Lancashire, 2000, 106–21.Google Scholar
25 Constable of Everingham, 54, 59–60.
26 Jones, Colin, ‘Some Recent Trends in the History of Charity’, in Daunton, , ed., Charity, 51–63, 55.Google Scholar
27 Innes, , ‘Mixed Economy of Welfare’, 154–5 Google Scholar; Rack, Henry D., Reasonable Enthusiast. John Wesley and the Rise of Methodism (London, 2002), 360–7.Google Scholar
28 Williams, J. A., ‘Some Eighteenth-Century Conversions’, Essex Recusant 3 (1961), 129–33, 129–30.Google Scholar
29 Ibid., 129–30.
30 Duffy, Eamon, ‘“Poor Protestant Flies”: Conversions to Catholicism in Early Eighteenth-Century England’, in Baker, Derek, ed., Religious Motivation: Biographical and Sociological Problems for the Church Historian, SCH 15 (Oxford, 1978), 289–304, 296–8.Google Scholar
31 Tempest, , Religio Laici, 40.Google Scholar
32 Ibid., 76.
33 Challoner, Richard, The Garden of the Soul: or a Manual of Spiritual Exercises and Instructions for Christians, who (Living in the World) Aspire to Devotion (Dublin, 1759), 25.Google Scholar
34 Crosby Records: a Cavalier’s Notebook, ed. T. Ellison Gibson (London, 1880), 188.
35 Innes, , ‘Mixed Economy of Welfare’, 154–5.Google Scholar
36 The Christian’s Companion Consisting of the Catechism of the London District; Think Well On’t; and the Daily Companion (2nd edn, Lisbon, 1812), 159.
37 Isle of Wight Registers, transcribed with historical introductions by R.E. Scantlebury, Catholic Record Society 59 (London, 1968), 67.
38 Tempest, , Religio Laici, 82 Google Scholar; for similar reminders in the nineteenth century, see Sheridan Gilley, ‘English Catholic Charity and the Irish Poor in London’, Recusant History 11 (1972), 179–95, 179–80.
39 Challoner, , Garden of the Soul, 32.Google Scholar
40 Norman, Marion, ‘John Gother and the English Way of Spirituality’, Recusant History 11 (1972), 306–19, 315 Google Scholar; The Journal of the Rev. John Wesley A.M., introduction by the Rev. F. W. Macdonald (London, 1921), 219; Hempton, David, Methodism and Politics in British Society 1750–1850 (Stanford, CA, 1984), 233.Google Scholar
41 Gregory, Jeremy, Restoration, Reformation and Reform, 1660–1828: Archbishops of Canterbury and their Diocese (Oxford, 2000), 117–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42 Bossy, English Catholic Community, 324–8.