Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T22:26:54.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letters to the Editors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2008

Eric Monkkonen
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles

Extract

Samuel Kernell's article “The Early Nationalization of Political News in America,” in Studies in American Political Development: An Annual (1986), 1: 255–78, raises issues that are at once interesting and puzzling. He measures the number and length of all political articles in leading Cleveland newspapers through the middle decades of the nineteenth century in order to ask about the amount of newspaper attention paid to local, state, and national political issues. He observes that local issues were predominant only very early in the nineteenth century and that they declined quickly over time. Kernell concludes that politics nationalized far earlier than historians like Robert Wiebe had ever thought. Wiebe's “island communities” were gone by 1845. It is a clever piece of research of substantial significance.

Type
Notes and Exchanges
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Log values are perhaps best used descriptively to flesh out common patterns across variables whose values differ or change dramatically. In a more recent examination of the Cleveland data, Professor Gary C. Jacobson and I employ log values in this way. See “Congress and the Presidency as News in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Politics (1987), forthcoming.

2. For several reasons, the number of political articles measured in this way is significantly larger than those reported in Figure la of the original article. First, the definition of political news is more inclusive than the one we used. Any news involving a government agency tended to be included under this rubric in the index. Second, because the synopses were so brief as to make coding unreliable, we excluded from analysis all entries of one column inch or less. Frequently, these consisted of announcements and brief anecdotes to fill in the interstices of articles. I failed to note this in the appendix; for a fuller discussion of the methodology employed here, see Kernell and Jacobson (1987). Third, I drew samples for the 1870s, where here the entire population of articles is included.