Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:15:35.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When Money Matters: Campaign Contributions, Roll Call Votes, and School Choice in Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Louay M. Constant
Louay M. Constant*
Affiliation:
RAND
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of campaign contributions on legislative roll call voting has long been the subject of debate. This study weighs into this debate by examining the impact of teachers' union contributions on votes on two school choice bills in the Florida House of Representatives during the 1998 and 1999 sessions. I find that different types of school choice bills evince different effects of campaign contributions from teachers' unions. Specifically, campaign contributions appear to influence voting on bills that are most important to a group's policy agenda but have no effect on bills more peripheral to their interests. Additionally, legislators receiving campaign contributions from teachers' unions were significantly more likely to vote against vouchers than against charter schools, even after controlling for other influences on their votes.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Summer 2006 , pp. 195 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austen-Smith, David. 1995. “Campaign Contributions and Access.” American Political Science Review 89:566–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1998. “Allocating Access for Information and Contributions.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 14:277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Jonathan C., Colin Cameron, A., and Carter, Colin A.. 1998. “Political Action Committee Contributions and U.S. Congressional Voting on Sugar Legislation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:441–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvert, Randall, and Dietz, Nathan. 1998. “Legislative Coalitions in a Bargaining Model with Externalities.” University of Rochester, W. Allen Wallis Institute of Political Economy Working Paper Series 16.Google Scholar
Chappell, Henry W. Jr. 1982. “Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting: A Simultaneous Probit-Tobit Model.” Review of Economics and Statistics 64:77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Center for Education Reform. 2005. www.edreform.com (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Chepak, Rob. 1995. “Brogan Seeks to Raise Grade for Success; The Commissioner Campaigns for Higher Academic Standards,” The Tampa Tribune, 3 December, 1.Google Scholar
Cibulka, James G. 2000. “Teachers Unions and School Choice.” In Conflicting Mission? Teachers' Unions and Educational Reform, ed. Loveless, Tom. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Coates, Dennis, and Munger, Michael. 1995. “Legislative Voting and the Economic Theory of Politics.” Southern Economic Journal 61:861–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaney, John T., Fiorito, Jack, and Jarley, Paul. 1999. “Evolutionary Politics? Union Differences and Political Activities.” Journal of Labor Research 20:277–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Education Commission of the States. 2005. www.ecs.org (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Elmore, Richard E., Abelmann, Charles H., and Fuhrman, Susan H.. 1996. “The New Accountability in State Education Reform: From Process to Performance.” In Holding Schools Accountable: Performance-Based Reform in Education, ed. Ladd, Helen F.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Florida AFL-CIO. 2001. “House Legislator Rankings (1992-2001).” www.flaflcio.org (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida Department of State Elections. 2001. http://election.dos.state.fl.us (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida Education Association. 2001. http://www.feaweb.org/positionpapers.asp (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida House of Representatives. 1998. “Journal of the House of Representatives.” http://www.myfloridahouse.gov (January 3, 2006). Florida House of Representatives. 1999. “Journal of the House of Representatives.” http://www.myfloridahouse.gov (January 3, 2006). Florida House of Representatives. 2001. http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Bills (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida Online Sunshine. 2001. http://www.leg.state.fl.us (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida Senate. 1998. “Journal of the Senate.” http://www.flsenate.gov (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida Senate. 2001. http://www.flsenate.gov/session (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Florida Senate Staff. 1998. “Senate Staff Analysis and Economic Impact Statement.” http://www.flsenate.gov/data/session/1998/Senate/bills/analysis/pdf/SB1996.ed.pdf (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Frank, Grace. 1999. “Voucher Bill Awaits Governor's Signature,” The Tampa Tribune, 1 May, 1.Google Scholar
Goidel, Robert K., Gross, Donald A., and Shields, Todd G.. 1999. Money Matters: Consequences of Campaign Finance Reform in U.S. House Elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gopoian, J. David, Smith, Hobart, and Smith, William. 1984. “What Makes PACs Tick? An Analysis of the Allocation Patterns of Economic Interest Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 28:259–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Stacy B. 2001. “All Votes Are Not Created Equal: Campaign Contributions and Critical Votes.” Journal of Politics 63:249–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, William. 1997. Econometric Analysis. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Grenzke, Janet M. 1989. “PACs and the Congressional Supermarket: The Currency is Complex.” American Journal of Political Science 33:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grier, Kevin B., and Munger, Michael C.. 1993. “Comparing Interest Group PAC Contributions to House and Senate Incumbents, 1980-1986.” Journal of Politics 55:615–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gujarati, Damodar N. 1995. Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1992. “Measuring Legislative Influence.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17:205–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Wayman, Frank. 1990. “Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees.” American Political Science Review 84:797–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Laura, Stecher, Brian M., and Klein, Stephen P.. 2002. Making Sense of Test-Based Accountability in Education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1978. “The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 72:469–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1985. “Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972-1982.” Public Choice 47:7–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessup, David. 1980. “Can Political Influence Be Democratized? A Labor Perspective.” In Parties, Interest Groups, and Campaign Finance Laws, ed. Malbin, Michael J.. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Kau, James B., Keenan, Donald, and Rubin, Paul H.. 1982. “A General Equilibrium Model of Congressional Voting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 97:271–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kau, James B., and Rubin, Paul H.. 1993. “Ideology, Voting, and Shirking.” Public Choice 76:151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kau, James B., and Rubin, Paul H.. 2002. “The Growth of the Government: Sources and Limits.” Public Choice 113:389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, Laura I. 1986. “Money and Access: Some Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Politics 48:1052–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Kathryn A. 2003. “What Causes Variation in States' Accountability Policies?” Peabody Journal of Education 78:153–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarrity, Joseph P., and Sutter, Daniel. 2000. “A Test of the Structure of PAC Contracts: An Analysis of House Gun Control Votes in the 1980s.” Southern Economic Journal 67:41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintrom, Michael, and Vergari, Sandra. 1998. “Policy Networks and Innovation Diffusion: The Case of State Education Reforms.” Journal of Politics 60:126–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, Sheila E., Evans, William N., and Schwab, Robert M.. 1998. “Education-Finance Reform and the Distribution of Education Resources.” American Economic Review 88:789–812.Google Scholar
National Education Association. 1996. NEA Handbook 1996-1997. Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States.Google Scholar
National Education Association. 2001. “NEA on Vouchers: Opposed.” http://www.nea.org/lac/vouchers/vouchposition.html (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
National Education Association. 2005. “Vouchers.” http://www.nea.org/vouchers/index.html (January 17, 2006).Google Scholar
Nickens, Tim. 1998. “Candidates Make the Effort on Education,” St. Petersburg Times, 6 August, 1D.Google Scholar
Omand, H. Lillian. 2004. “School Choice Legislation: A Supply-Side Market Effects Analysis.” Journal of Law and Politics 20:77–142.Google Scholar
Rado, Diane. 1995. “Legislators Press New School Chief for Help on Bills,” St. Petersburg Times, 26 January, 5B.Google Scholar
Romer, Thomas, and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1994. “An Empirical Investigation of the Dynamics of PAC Contributions.” American Journal of Political Science 38:745–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1984-85. “Who's in Charge? Accountability in Political Action Committees.” Political Science Quarterly 99:591–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorauf, Frank J. 1992. Inside Campaign Finance: Myths and Realities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Writers, Staff. 1994. “Where the Major Candidates Stand on the Issues,” St. Petersburg Times, 31 August, 10G.Google Scholar
Stratmann, Thomas. 1992. “Are Contributors Rational? Untangling Strategies of Political Action Committees.” Journal of Political Economy 100:647–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Joel A., William Cassie, and Malcolm Jewell. 1994. “A Sacred Cow or Just a Lot of Bull? Party and PAC Money in State Legislative Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 47:223–37.Google Scholar
United States Department of Education. 2005. No Child Left Behind Act. April 2005. http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=ln (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
Welch, W. P. 1980. “The Allocation of Political Monies: Economic Interest Groups.” Public Choice 35:37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, Charles W., Hamm, Keith E., and Bell, Charles G.. 1992. “Interest-Group and Party Influence Agents in the Legislative Process: A Comparative State Analysis. Journal of Politics 54:82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. 1985. “PACs, Contributions, and Roll Calls: An Organizational Perspective.” American Political Science Review 79:400–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, John R. 1990. “Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Political Science Review 84:417–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar