Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T18:41:04.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

U.S State Tax and Expenditure Limitations: A Comparative Political Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Michael J. New
Michael J. New*
Affiliation:
University of Alabama
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Much of the academic literature that examines U.S. state tax and expenditure limitations (TELs) concludes that TELs are an ineffective mechanism for limiting state spending. However, one shortcoming common to all of these studies is their failure to take into account the incentives of the political actors who enact these TELs. I hypothesize that because of differences in incentives, TELs enacted by citizen initiatives will be more stringent and more effective than TELs passed by state legislatures. An examination of the provisions of the various TELs and a regression analysis support this hypothesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , Spring 2010 , pp. 25 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Burton, and Dougan, William. 1986. “The Effects of Constitutional Restraint on Government Spending.” Public Choice 49:101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alt, James, and Lowry, Robert. 2000. “A Dynamic Model of State Budget Outcomes Under Divided Partisan Government.” The Journal of Politics 62:1035–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bails, Dale. 1990. “The Effectiveness of Tax and Expenditure Limitations: A Re-evaluation.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 49:223–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bails, Dale, and Tieslau, Margie. 2000. “The Impact of Fiscal Constitutions on State and Local Expenditures.” Cato Journal 20:255–77.Google Scholar
Berry, William, Berkman, Michael, and Schneiderman, Stuart. 2000. Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries. ICPSR Publication Related Archive. www.icpsr.umich.edu/pra/index.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William, Ringquist, Evan, Fording, Richard, and Hanson, Russell. 1998. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960–1993.” American Journal of Political Science 42:327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William, Ringquist, Evan, Fording, Richard, and Hanson, Russell. 2004. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the United States. ICPSR Publication Related Archive. www.icpsr.umich.edu/pra/index.html.Google Scholar
Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Annual Personal Income and Employment 1929–2008.” www.bea.gov/regional/spi/ (May 6, 2009).Google Scholar
Camobreco, John. 1998. “Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process.” The Journal of Politics 60:819–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaloupka, Bill. 2005. “TABOR Pains.” The American Prospect. 13 October. www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=tabor_pains (May 6, 2009).Google Scholar
Colorado Department of Revenue. 2001. “2001 Colorado Sales Tax (TABOR) Refund.” www.revenue.state.co.us/refund2001.html (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Colorado Department of Revenue. 2000. “2000 Colorado Sales Tax (TABOR) Refund.” www.revenue.state.co.us/refund2000.html (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Colorado Department of Revenue. 1999. “1999 Colorado Sales Tax (TABOR) Refund.” www.revenue.state.co.us/refund99.html (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Colorado Department of Revenue. 1998. “1998 Colorado Sales Tax (TABOR) Refund.” www.revenue.state.co.us/refund98.html (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Colorado Department of Revenue. 1997. “1997 Colorado Sales Tax (TABOR) Refund.” www.revenue.state.co.us/refund.html (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Colorado Joint Budget Committee. 2005. “2005–2006 Appropriations Report.” www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/jbc/FY05–06apprept.pdf (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Colorado Office of State Budgeting and Planning. 2004. “TABOR—The Taxpayer's Bill of Rights: Special Report.” www.state.co.us/gov_dir/govnr_dir/ospb/specialreports/tabor-sep2004.pdf (February 1, 2007).Google Scholar
Cox, James, and Lowery, David. 1990. “The Impact of Tax Revolt Era State Fiscal Caps.” Social Science Quarterly 71:492–509.Google Scholar
Council of State Governments. Various Years. The Book of the States. Lexington, KY: Council of State Governments.Google Scholar
Crain, W. Mark. 2003. Volatile States. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Figueiredo, Rui J.P. 2002. “Electoral Competition, Political Uncertainty, and Policy Insulation.” American Political Science Review 96:321–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S., Wright, Gerald C., and McIver, John P.. 1993. Statehouse Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frates, Chris. 2004. “Budget Fix Awaits New Year.” The Denver Post, 23 September, A-01.Google Scholar
Garber, Andrew. 2007. “Eyman's Latest Plan Targets State Taxes.” The Seattle Times, 23 October.Google Scholar
Howard, Marcia. 1989. “State Tax and Expenditure Limitations: There Is No Story.” Public Budgeting and Finance 9:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independence Institute. 1999. “TABOR Legislative Handbook.” Independence Institute Paper. Golden, CO: Independence Institute.Google Scholar
James, Franklin, and Wallis, Allan. 2004. “Tax and Spending Limits in Colorado.” Public Budgeting and Finance 24:16–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Kirk. 2005. “Colorado Cap on Spending is Suspended.” The New York Times. 3 November.Google Scholar
Joyce, Philip G., and Mullins, Daniel R.. 1991. “The Changing Fiscal Structure of the State and Local Sector: The Impact of Tax and Expenditure Limitations.” Public Administration Review 51:240–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Philip G., and Mullins, Daniel R.. 1996. “Tax and Expenditure Limitations and State and Local Fiscal Structure: An Empirical Assessment.” Public Budgeting and Finance 16:75–100.Google Scholar
Kenyon, Daphne, and Benker, Karen. 1985. “Fiscal Discipline: Lessons from the State Experience.” National Tax Journal 37:433–46.Google Scholar
King-Meadows, Tyson, and Lowery, David. 1996. “The Impact of the Tax Revolt Era State Fiscal Caps: A Research Update.” Public Budgeting and Finance 16:102–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legislative Evaluation and Accountability Project. Various Years. “Legislative Budget Notes.” http://leap.leg.wa.gov/leap/budget/index_lbns.asp (December 10, 2008).Google Scholar
Martell, Christine, and Teske, Paul. 2007. “Fiscal Management Implications of the TABOR Bind.” Public Administration Review 67:673–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John. 1995. “Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years.” Journal of Political Economy 103:578–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsusaka, John. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McAtee, Andrea, Yackee, Susan Webb, and Lowery, David. 2003. “Reexamining the Dynamic Model of Divided Partisan Government.” The Journal of Politics 65:477–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry, and Caldwell, Michael. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional Theoretical Economics 150:171–95.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2005a. State Tax and Expenditure Limits—2005. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. Various Years. State Tax Actions. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
Owings, Stephanie, and Borck, Rainald. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Government Spending: Do Citizen Legislatures Really Spend Less?” Public Finance Review 28:210–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Primo, David. 2007. Rules and Restraint. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rafool, Mandy. 1996. “State Tax and Expenditure Limits.” Legislative Finance Paper No. 104. Denver, CO: National Conference of State Legislators.Google Scholar
Sanko, John. 1999. '“92 Election Was a Fiscal Facelift.” Denver Rocky Mountain News, 3 August.Google Scholar
The Seattle Times. 2006. “Attorney General Plans to Appeal Spending Ruling.” 1 April.Google Scholar
Shadbegian, Ronald. 1996. “Do Tax and Expenditure Limitations Affect the Size and Growth of Government?” Contemporary Economic Policy 14:22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkansky, Ira. 1968. Spending in the American States. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel A. 1998. Tax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, Ralph. 2007. “Supreme Court Upholds 2005 Tax Maneuvering.” The Seattle Times, 21 November.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. Various Years. Government Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. Various Years. State Government Finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. “State and Local Government Finances.” www.census.gov/govs/www/estimate.html (May 6, 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. “State Government Finances.” www.census.gov/govs/www/state.html (May 6, 2009).Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. Various Years. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Washington Alliance for a Competitive Economy. 2005. “I-601: The Tie That No Longer Binds.” Competitiveness Brief CB 05–07. Seattle, WA: Washington Alliance for a Competitive Economy.Google Scholar
Washington State Expenditure Limit Committee. 2006. “Chronology of Initiative 601 Amendments.” www.elc.wa.gov (December 11, 2008).Google Scholar
Winters, Richard. 1976. “Party Control and Policy Change.” American Journal of Political Science 20:597–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Curt. 2006. “Judge Strikes Down Taxes in Spending Limit Lawsuit.” The Seattle Times, 17 March.Google Scholar
Woodward, Curt. 2008. “Tax Limiting Initiative Spawned Court Battle, Crimped Fee Hikes.” The Seattle Times, 18 March.Google Scholar
Zax, Jeffrey. 1989. “Initiatives and Government Expenditures.” Public Choice 63:267–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar