Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:54:49.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Legislative Elections, 1967–2003: Announcing the Completion of a Cleaned and Updated Dataset

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2021

Thomas M. Carsey ,
Richard G. Niemi ,
William D. Berry ,
Lynda W. Powell  and
James M. Snyder Jr.
Thomas M. Carsey
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina
Richard G. Niemi
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
William D. Berry
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Lynda W. Powell
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
James M. Snyder Jr.
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

More than 15 years—nine election cycles—have passed since a comprehensive set of state legislative election data was compiled and made available to researchers and practitioners: the Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research's (ICPSR) State Legislative Election Returns in the United States dataset (Study #8907) collected by Malcolm Jewell (Jewell 1991) and containing observations from 1967 to 1988. With this hiatus in mind, we set out at various times initially—in three independent efforts (Berry and Carsey; Niemi, and Powell; Snyder)—to gather legislative election data for all states and elections since 1988. In addition, Berry and Carsey (2005) cleaned the original dataset to make it more accurate and usable; their corrections led to the release of a revised ICPSR dataset (Study #3938). The culmination of these efforts is a dataset containing information about general elections for state legislative seats from 1967 to 2003, now available through ICPSR (Study 21480).

Type
The Practical Researcher
Information
State Politics & Policy Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , Winter 2008 , pp. 430 - 443
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berry, William D., Berkman, Michael B., and Schneiderman, Stuart. 2000. “Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries.” American Political Science Review 94:859–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, William D., and Carsey, Thomas M.. 2005. “Revised Candidate-Level State Legislative Returns in the United States with Adjusted Candidate Names, 1968–1989.” ICPSR dataset 3938.Google Scholar
Carey, John, Niemi, Richard G., and Powell, Lynda W.. 2000. “Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Election.” The Journal of Politics 62:671–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John, Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Moncrief, Gary. 2006. “The Effects of Term Limits on State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31:105–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm. 1991. “Editor's Introduction: State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:1–5.Google Scholar
Jewell, Malcolm E., and Breaux, David. 1991. “Southern Primary and Electoral Competition and Incumbent Success.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Jackman, Simon, and Winsky, Laura R.. 1991. “Candidacies and Competitiveness in Multimember Districts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., Berry, William D., Carsey, Thomas M., and Snyder, Thomas M. Jr. 2006. “Competition in State Legislative Elections, 1992–2002.” In The Marketplace of Democracy: Electoral Competition and American Politics, eds. McDonald, Michael P. and Samples, John. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Stanley, Harold W., and Niemi, Richard G.. 2007. Vital Statistics on American Politics, 2007–2008. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Ronald E., Tucker, Harvey J., and Brace, Paul. 1991. “Vanishing Marginals in State Legislative Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar